Case law

In Re Revocation of License of Berman

245 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1957

Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 , 90 L. Ed. 718 . The Court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the State Board of Opticians in making findings of fact. Baker v. … Copeland v. State Medical Board, 107 Ohio St. 20 , 140 N.E. 660 ; Sherburne v. Dental Examiners, 13 Idaho 105 , 88 P. 762 ; Sanborn v. Weir, 95 Vt. 1 , 112 A. 228 ; S. v.

Ponder v. Joslin

262 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1964

Burgin v. Board of Elections, supra. … Hayes v. Benton, 193 N.C. 379 , 137 S.E. 169 ; Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 ; Harris v. Board of Education, supra.” Hinshaw v. McIver, 244 N.C. 256 , 93 S.E. 2d 90 ; Watson v.

Albemarle Electric Membership Corp. v. Alexander

282 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1972

Housing Authority v. Wooten, 257 N.C. 358 , 126 S.E. 2d 101 ; Huntley v. Potter, 255 N.C. 619 , 122 S.E. 2d 681 ; Kirby v. Board of Education, 230 N.C. 619 , 55 S.E. 2d 322 ; 51 Am. Jur. Taxation, § 655. … Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Reale, 30 Colo. App. 564 , 499 P. 2d 644 ; Abbot v. State Tax Commission, 88 Idaho 200 , 398 P. 2d 221 ; State Board of Tax Comrs. v. Traylor, 141 Ind.

State v. Williams

149 N.C. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 2002

See State v. Brown, 146 N.C. … App. at 573 , 553 S.E.2d at 697 ; see also State v. Brown, 146 N.C. App. 590, 591-92 , 553 S.E.2d 428, 429 (2001) (likewise rejecting equal protection challenge to Moore County policy); State v. Wilson, 139 N.C.

Allman v. Swain Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2025

However, the State Board, which ultimately issued the decision, is. See McFadyen v. New Hanover Cnty, 273 N.C. … ALLMAN V.

O'Herron v. Jerson

82 N.C. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

Mayo v. Mayo, 73 N.C. App. 406 , 326 S.E. 2d 283 (1985). As appears from the record before this Court, the only competent evidence presented was the verified supplemental petition, Schoolfield v. … State Bar v. Wilson, 74 N.C. App. 777 , 330 S.E. 2d 280 (1985), the trial court was precluded from considering them as affidavits in the cause because they were not verified. Schoolfield, supra. In Brown v.

Stockton v. Wake County

173 F. Supp. 3d 292 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 2016

See, e.g., Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 60-64 , 131 S.Ct. 1350 , 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011); Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Kutz, board certified in emergency medicine with a subspeciality of emergency medical services,.

Raynor v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 30, 2010

Stat. § 97-84 ; Smith v. William Muirhead Constr. Co. , 27 N.C. App. 286 , 291 , 218 S.E.2d 717 , 720 (1975). 4. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Snead v. Mills, Inc. , supra. 5.

State v. Diaz

317 N.C. 545 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 1986

. *547 State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984) (citations omitted). “It is immaterial whether the substantial evidence is circumstantial or direct, or both.” State v. … was on board at the time marijuana was being transported.

Murdock v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad

159 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1912

Burney v. Allen, 127 N. C., 476 ; S. v. McDowell, 129 N. C., 523 ; Britt v. R. R., 148 N. C., 37 . … Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 367 ; Herndon v. R. R., 121 N. C., 498 , and eases there cited; Crenshaw v. R. R., 140 N. C., 193 . The motion is denied. No error. •

Hayes v. Fowler

123 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1996

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 629 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 385 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … See Freewood Associates v. Board of Adjustment, 28 N.C.

State v. Etheridge

319 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1987

Brown and his threat to “fix” her face, “although they may have induced fear, appeared to have been unrelated to the act of sexual intercourse between Brown and the defendant.” … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977); State v. Revelle, 301 N.C. 153 , 270 S.E. 2d 476 (1980).

Goins v. Cross Creek Apparel

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 25, 1996

Brown reached a diagnosis of cervical disc disease at the C5-C6 level. Dr. Brown recommended continuing conservative care and made an appointment for plaintiff on April 17, 1992. … Henry v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co. , 231 N.C. 477 , 57 S.E.2d 760 (1950). 3.

David v. Alphin

817 F. Supp. 2d 764 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2011

Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Miles v. … Browning v. Tiger’s Eye Benefits Consulting, 313 Fed.Appx. 656, 663 (4th Cir.2009).

In Re the Appeal of Reeves Broadcasting Corp.

273 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1968

Belks Department Store, Inc., v. Guilford County, supra. Abuse of discretion is not shown, and error of law prejudicial to the taxpayer does not appear. … In re Wallace, 267 N.C. 204 , 147 S.E. 2d 922 ; Vance v. Hampton, 256 N.C. 557 , 124 S.E. 2d 527 ; Hertford v. Harris, 263 N.C. 776 , 140 S.E. 2d 420 ; Lowe v. Jackson, 263 N.C. 634 , 140 S.E. 2d 1 .

Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.

287 N.C. 493 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E. 2d 600 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … See: Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 281 N.C. 715 , 190 S.E. 2d 175 ; Town of Hillsborough v. Smith, 276 N.C. 48 , 170 S.E. 2d 904 ; Warner v. W & O, Inc., 263 N.C. 37 , 138 S.E. 2d 782 ; Stowe v.

Allison v. . Allison

56 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

The cases cited by the plaintiffs’ counsel of Kirkpatrick v. Rogers, 6 Ire. Eq. Rep. 135; Hudson v. Pierce, 8 Ire. Eq. Rep. 126, and Lea v. … The reason for the distinction is stated in Lea v. Brown, and need not be here repeated. Our opinion then is, that the legacy to John G.

State v. Milton

166 N.C. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

Eddie Brown, Jr. ("Brown"),Ross's cousin and good friend, remained in the street in front of the cab. Defendant exited the taxi and started fighting with Brown. … State v. Small, 328 N.C. 175 , 181-82, 400 S.E.2d 413 , 416 (1991) (quoting State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 58-59, 337 S.E.2d 808 , 822-23 (1985) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165 , 90 L.

Tierney v. Reed Lallier Chevrolet

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 16, 2008

The video shows plaintiff performing some limited tasks outside his son's business, such as lifting a screen printing board up in the air to look for imperfections and pulling pieces of masking tape off screen printing boards … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 329 , 477 S.E.2d 197 , 2002 (1996).

Styers v. Phillips

277 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1971

Accord, Reed v. Huston, 24 Idaho 26 , 132 p. 109. In Moore v. Board of Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N.J. … In United States v.