Case law

Wisdom v. Newberry

30 Mo. App. 241 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1888

Walker v. Deane, 79 Mo. 681 . … Fisher v. Goebel, 40 Mo. 481 , and cases cited.

State v. Birks

199 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1906

[State v. Furgerson, supra; State v. Hagan, 164 Mo. l. c. 658; State v. Williams, 184 Mo. 261 ; State v. Woodward, 191 Mo. 617 .] … The case of State v.

State ex rel. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit v. Jones

823 S.W.2d 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 17, 1992

Weinstein v. St. … Jacobsmeyer v.

State v. Barnes

345 S.W.2d 130 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

State v. Sarkis, supra; State v. Bright, supra. … State v. Morton, Mo.Sup., 338 S.W.2d 858, 861 (3); State v. Griffin, supra; State v. Wolfe, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 10 ; State v. Williams, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 58 ; State v. Chamineak, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 153 .

State Ex Rel. Milham v. Rickhoff

633 S.W.2d 733 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1982

V, § 4. Plaintiff brought suit against the Board and six individuals alleging he was libeled by a television program broadcast over station KOMU, Columbia, Missouri. … City of Olivette v. Graeler, 338 S.W.2d 827, 835 (Mo.1960). In Marshall v.

Powers v. Ellfeldt

768 S.W.2d 142 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1989

Murphy v. Land, 420 S.W.2d 505, 507 (Mo.1967); Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 421 S.W.2d 255, 259 (Mo. banc 1967). … Neither opinion refers to the prior cases of Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra, Murphy v. Land, supra, or Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., supra.

Carter v. Foster

145 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

In re Board of Street Opening, 22 N. Y. … In the cases of Blackman v. Striker, 142 N. Y. 555 ; Brown v. Spilman, 155 U. S. 665 ; Winston v. Johnson, 45 N. W.

State v. Bryson

506 S.W.2d 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1974

He opened the brown paper and found a plastic syringe with a needle and some tablets soaking in a yellow watery substance. … In State v.

State ex rel. Governor Michael L. Parson, Relator v. The Honorable Cotton Walker

Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 2024

Dorsey v. … Oliver v.

Boone Ex Rel. Ferry v. Danforth

463 S.W.2d 825 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1971

Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 , 89 S.Ct. 1493 , 23 L.Ed.2d 1 ; Pierce v. La Valle, 2 Cir., 293 F.2d 233 ; Friend v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 323 , 388 F.2d 579 ; Matthews v. … For example, in Sonnenberg v.

Jones v. State

471 S.W.2d 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

There is no showing that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has any such policy or that it permits any prisoners to be represented by counsel at the hearing. Actually, Earnest v. … Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 156 F.2d 848 (1946); Washington v. Hagan, 287 F.2d 332 (3rd Cir. 1960); Lavendera v. Taylor, 347 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1966); Gonzales v.

Pugh v. School District No. 5

114 Mo. App. 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1905

The employment must be made by the members as a board, at a regular or special board meeting. [Section 9766, R. S. 1899; Johnson v. School District, 67 Mo. 319 ; Honaker v. Board of Education, 42 W. Va. 170 ; Aikman v. … School Dis., 27 Kans. 129 ; Hazen v. Lerche, 47 Mich. 626 ; Townsend v. School Trustees, 41 N. J. L. 312.] The facts in the case of McShane v. School District, 70 Mo. App. 624 , do not appear as clearly as they might.

State v. Black

677 S.W.2d 907 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1984

State v. Cleveland, 627 S.W.2d 600, 601 (Mo. banc 1982). However to the extent possible we have reviewed to determine whether the defendant’s confession was voluntarily made. … State v. Thornton, 557 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Mo.App.1977). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. KAROHL, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Beck v. James

793 S.W.2d 416 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1990

Gamble v. Hoffman, 732 S.W.2d 890, 892 (Mo. banc 1987). The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the decision of the Board. Lebedun v. Robinson, 768 S.W.2d 219, 222 (Mo.App.1989). … Franklin v. Board of Directors, School Dist. of Kansas City, 772 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.App.1989).

Sanford v. State

766 S.W.2d 652 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1988

See Glover v. State, 528 S.W.2d 507, 509 [2] (Mo.App.1975). Moreover, movant’s allegation that Brown was the person known by the police to have truly committed the crime is a bare conclusion. … Movant fails to state which police officer knew Brown to be guilty or what facts supported this officer’s belief of the same. See Todd v.

State Ex Rel. Askew v. Kopp

330 S.W.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1960

Aviation Services v. Board of Adjustment, 1956, 20 N.J. 275 , 119 A. 2d 761 , loe. cit. 766. This question is considered in Anno. … Helsel v. Board of County Commissioners, 1948, 149 Ohio St. 583 , 79 N.E.2d 911 ; a turnpike commission could establish a turnpike through territory zoned against turnpike use, State ex rel. Ohio Turnpike Commission v.

State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. New Lindell Hotel Co.

9 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1881

Co. v. Cass County, 53 Mo. 17 , 29 ; The State v. Drake, 33 N. J. L. 194 ; The State v. Anderson, 38 N. J. L. 82 ; Commissioners v. Lang, 8 Kan. 284 , 287 ; Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Russell, 8 Kan. 558 ; Cleghorn v. … Patten v. Green, 13 Cal. 325 ; Sioux City, etc., R. Co. v. Washington County, 3 Neb. 30, 43 .

HENRY COUNTY and TANEY COUNTY, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. W. ARCHIE DUNN

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2024

Lisle v. Meyer Elec. Co., 667 S.W.3d 100, 103 (Mo. banc 2023). … K.M.J. v. M.A.J., 363 S.W.3d 172, 178 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012).

Myers v. Bassett

84 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Brown, on Ms application, was made a co-defendant, and filed his separate answer setting out Ms title. The Bassetts filed a joint answer which was a general denial. … In the cases of Stafford v. Kizer, 82 Mo. 393 , and Gitchell v.

Raymond v. Fisher

6 Mo. 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1839

Whether the decision in Freeman v Adams was well supported by authority or not, it goes clearly to shew the opinion, entertained by the New York court, of th« grounds on which the case of Brown v Goodman and th® cases in … R. 1190, and Brown vs Goodman in note to same case Freeman^ ts Adams 9 J. R. 115, Jewell v Schroppel, 4 Cowen 564; Lang-worth and Clark vs Smith, 2 Mend, 587 Stutivell v Miles 2 Marsh, 425.