Case law

Guthrie v. Taylor

279 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1971

City of Charlotte, 273 N.C. 293 , 160 S.E. 2d 18 ; Motley *714 v. Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 , 175 A.L.R. 253 ; State v. Trantham, 230 N.C. 641 , 55 S.E. 2d 198 . … Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Trantham, supra.

In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.

259 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

Power Co. v. Bowles, 229 N.C. 143 , 48 S.E. 2d 287 ; McLean v. Board of Elections, 222 N.C. 6 , 21 S.E. 2d 842 . … Cab Co. v.. Charlotte, supra.

Fuller v. . Lockhart

209 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Lacy v. Bank, 183 N. C., 373 ; Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin, 194 N. C., 768 .” Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 . … Clark v. McQueen, 195 N. C., 714 (716); Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 645 (650).

Wiggs v. Edgecombe County

179 N.C. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2006

Edgecombe County and Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners (“defendants”) appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of Jerry Wiggs (“plaintiff”) on plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, denying … Bowers v. City of High Point, 339 N.C. 413, 415 , 451 S.E.2d 284, 286 (1994). N.C. Gen.

George v. McClure

266 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001

Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C.App. 264, 270 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 724 (1981). Further, “a release is subject to avoidance by a showing that its execution resulted from fraud or mutual mistake.” Sykes v. … Keiltex Indus., Inc., 123 N.C.App. 482, 485 , 473 S.E.2d 341, 344 (1996) (citing Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.CApp. at 269, 276 S.E.2d at 723 ).

State v. Harris

290 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1976

The substance of defendant’s statement was that defendant, Phyllis Brown and David Briggs planned to rob Mr. … This instruction required the jury to determine whether or not Phyllis Brown as an accomplice.

Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n

158 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2003

(citing Messick v. Catawba County, 110 N.C. … We find the rational in Long persuasive, and hold that the Board, as a governmental entity, is immune from punitive damages. V.

Fleming v. . Congleton

177 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1919

Mason v. Durham, 175 N. C., 641 , approved in Keener v. Asheville, ante, 1. … Whittier v. Collins, 15 R. I., 90; Bacon v. Moody, 117 Ga., 207 ; Austen v. Decker, 109 Iowa, 109 ; Black v. Miller, 75 Mich., 323 .”

State v. Hopper

186 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1923

C., 826 ; *411 S. v. Ferguson, 107 N. C., 841 . See cases cited in S. v. Johnson, 182 N. C., 888 . Hardin v. Davis, 183 N. C., 47 . Walker, J., in S. v. … This kind, of testimony was objected to in S. v. O’Higgins, supra, and Brown, J., said: “The evidence that the defendant abandoned his motherless children in order to elope with Mrs.

North Carolina v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare

480 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 8, 1979

Its statutory authority for doing so is 42 U.S.C. § 2000d-5, as discussed in Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1969), and Taylor v. Cohen, supra at 280 n. 5. Wilbert A. … A panel of scholars assembled by the National Academy of Education at HEW’s request was apparently unable to agree on the meaning of Brown v. Board of Education or on its implementation in public school desegregation.

State v. Downs

193 N.C. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2008

Brown to bill customers for charges made to the customers' accounts. … Brown to Edenton Construction's account, and that pursuant to State v. Valladares, 182 N.C.

Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. Barringer

242 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

In Brown v. … Collette v. Town of Charlotte, supra; First Universalist Society v. Boland, supra; Brown v. Independent Baptist Church of Woburn, supra; Copenhaver v.

Lowman v. City of Asheville

229 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1948

Brown v. Hall, 226 N. C., 732 , 40 S.E. (2d), 412 ; Cody v. Hovey, 219 N. C., 369 , 14 S. E. (2d), 30 ; Wolf v. Goldstein, 192 N. C., 818 , 135 S. E., 39 ; Hensley v. Furniture Co., 164 N. C., 148 , 80 S. E., 154 . … Cody v. Iiovey, supra: Brown v. Hall, supra. Even so, we know of no reason wiry the defendant, if it so desires, may not apply for a bill of particulars, as provided in G. S., 1-150. Building Co. v. Jones, 227 N.

Frank v. Savage

205 N.C. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

See Knight v. Higgs, 189 N.C. App. 696, 704 , 659 S.E.2d 742, 748 (2008) (holding that- County Board of Elections violated the Open Meetings Law); H.B.S. Contractors v. Cumberland County Bd. of Education, 122 N.C. … See Anderson v.

Stancil v. Bruce Stancil Refrigeration, Inc.

81 N.C. App. 567 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance Company, 288 N.C. 338 , 218 S.E. 2d 368 (1975). … Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E. 2d 335 (1967). The right of cumulative voting in an election of corporate directors is granted by G.S. 55-67(c).

Commissioners v. . Trust Co.

143 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1906

State v. Deliesseline, 10 S. C., 52. … State v. McBride, 4 Mo., 308 . See also Stanford v. Ellington, 77 N. C., 255.

Dunkley v. Shoemate

121 N.C. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 1996

Brown v. Lanier, 60 N.C. App. 575, 577 , 299 S.E.2d 279, 281 (1983) (citing Vernon v. Crist, 291 N.C. 646 , 231 S.E.2d 591 (1977)). … Nevertheless, in this case, we are bound by Brown v. Lanier and must deem the statute of limitations defenses as pled in avoidance.

State v. Matias

354 N.C. 549 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). “[I]n a prosecution for possession of contraband materials, the prosecution is not required to prove actual physical possession of the materials.” State v. … Davis, 325 N.C. at 697 , 386 S.E.2d at 190 ; sée also Brown, 310 N.C. at 569 , 313 S.E.2d at 588-89 .

Dixon v. . Pender

188 N.C. 792 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1924

Brown, and bad several children born of tbe marriage, and defendants, since tbe death of Annie Brown, their mother, are and have been in possession of tbe property under decrees of court and deeds by virtue of which they … Allen v. Parker, supra; Noble v. Williams, 167 N. C., p. 112; Poisson v. Pettaway, 159 N. C., p. 650; Watson v. Sullivan, 153 N. C., p. 246; Paul v. Carter, 153 N. C., p. 26; Little v. Buie, 58 N. C., p. 10; Dozier v.

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Gray

121 N.C. 168 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

.: The plaintiff, through its agent Brown, delivered to the defendant a sewing machine, under a written contract, which plaintiff calls a lease on the instalment plan — so much to be paid at the time of delivery and then … C., 377 ; Crinkley v. Egerton, 113 N. C., 444 ; Clark v. Hill, 117 N. C., 11 ; Barrington v. Skinner, Ibid, 47; and would be a conditional sale.