Case law

Armstrong v. . Kinsell

164 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

These are fully discussed and distinguished in Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . … S., 714 ; Winfree v. Bagley, 102 N. C., 515 ; Long v. Insurance Co., 114 N. C., 465 ; Heilbetter v. Oil Co., 112 U. S., 294 . Bernhardt v. Brown has been repeatedly cited; see Anno. Ed.

Deans v. Mansfield

210 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2011

In Dickinson v. … Oshita v. Hill, 65 N.C.

State v. Chapman

154 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 2002

Stat. § 14-318.4 (a3) (2001); State v. Krider, 145 N.C. … This assignment of error is overruled. *447 V. Cross-examination Testimony Defendant contends the trial court erred in preventing him from cross-examining Ms. Brown regarding her observations of the demeanor of Ms.

Spiers v. Davenport

263 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1964

Property owners dissatisfied with values equalized by the Board may appeal to the State Board of Assessment. G.S. 105-329. … Williams v. Comrs., 182 N.C. 135 , 108 S.E. 503 ; Wolfenden v. Comrs., 152 N.C. 83 , 67 S.E. 319 ; Fromkin v. State, 63 N.W. 2d 332 ; State v.

Brickhouse v. . Brickhouse

33 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1850

The recent case of Fairly v. … Moons v. DeBernoles , 1 Russ., 301. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. Cited: Overton v. Sawyer , 52 N.C. 6 ; Kiff v. Weaver , 94 N.C. 277 ; University v. Bank , 96 N.C. 286 ; Smith v. Durham , 127 N.C. 418 . *Page 291 (407)

State v. Smith

135 N.C. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1999

State v. … State v. Munsey, 342 N.C. 882, 885 , 467 S.E.2d 425, 427 (1996) (citation omitted).

In Re Wilkins

294 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1978

Konigsberg v. … In State v.

Comrs. of Washington v. . Gaines

221 N.C. 324 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

S., 5356, Bank v. Watt, 207 N. C., 577 , 178 S. E., 228 ; Wilkinson v. Boomer, 217 N. C., 217 , 7 S. E. (2d), 491 , to require the levying and collection of special assessments. … Wilkinson v. Boomer, supra. The plaintiffs here, as did the plaintiff in Bank v.

HIEN NGUYEN v. Taylor

200 N.C. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2009

Plaintiffs Romaine Watkins (Watkins), David Gregory (Gregory), and Matthew Brown (Brown), who were all police officers working off-duty at the mall, responded to the security guard’s call and repeatedly requested that Taylor … Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, 115 N.C. App. 423, 426 , 444 S.E.2d 694, 697 (1994). Avoiding separate trials on different issues does not affect a substantial right. J&B Slurry Seal Co. v.

Plott v. Bojangle's Restaurants, Inc.

181 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2007

Brown released plaintiff to work with significant permanent restrictions on 24 February 2003. … Brown during this period. On 13 June 2003, Dr. Brown wrote plaintiff out of work from 3 December 2002 to 3 August 2003, and on 6 August 2003, Dr. Brown wrote plaintiff out of work "indefinitely."

State ex rel Utils. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.

367 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2014

Browning, Jr., for applicant-appellee Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC. Antoinette R. Wike, Chief Counsel, and William E. Grantmyre and David T. … COMM’N V. COOPER, ATT’Y GEN.

State v. Kelly

120 N.C. App. 821 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995

Upon delivery, the undercover officer told defendant Gardner that he had a package for Randy Brown and Gardner stated that he was Randy Brown, and signed for the package “Randy Borwn [sic].” … State v. Cousins, 289 N.C. 540, 550-51 , 223 S.E.2d 338, 345 (1976).

State v. Townsend

236 N.C. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2014

A Knoll motion, based on State v. … As such, the first Brown factor was met. See State v. Kostick, ___ N.C.

Poe v. W. F. Smith & Co.

172 N.C. 67 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1916

Mizell *74 v. Burnett, 49 N. C., 249 ; Green v. R. R., 77 N. C., 95 ; Miller v. Monazite Co., 152 N. C., 608 ; Brown v. Hobbs, 154 N. C., 544 . … The plaintiff, therefore, has failed to show a case within the principle decided in Brown v. Hobbs, supra, or Michael v. Foil, 100 N. C., 78 ; Little v. McCarter, 89 N. C., 233 , and the cases cited in Brown v.

Presnell v. Pell

298 N.C. 715 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1979

Snow v. Board of Architecture, 273 N.C. 559, 570-71 , 160 S.E. 2d 719, 727 (1968); compare, however, Lloyd v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra.

Great Southern Media, Inc. v. McDowell County

50 N.C. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1981

Selective Insurance Co. of America v. Norris

209 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 2002

As a result, these customers notified Selective of potential claims against David Brown, and sought recovery from the $25,000 bond Selective had issued to David Brown. … Co. of America v. Coffman, 1987 WL 38632 * 1 (4th Cir.

Kbt Realty Servs., Inc. v. Appycity, LLC

2021 NCBC 47 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 9, 2021

DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. … See Brown v. Cavit Scis., Inc., 230 N.C. App. 460, 467 (2013) (“A complaint which fails to state a cause of action is not sufficient to support a default judgment for plaintiff.” (citation omitted)). 37.

In Re the Last Will & Testament of Lomax

226 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1946

In re Will of Brown (Byron Brown), 203 N. C., 347 , 166 S. E., 72 ; In re Will of Brown (George H. Brown), 194 N. C., 583, 595 , 140 S. E., 192 ; In re Hinton, 180 N. C., 206 , 104 S. E., 341 . … McLeary v. Norment, 84 N. C., 235 ; In re Will of Brown, supra; In re Will of Brown, 194 N. C., 583 , supra.

Ramsbottom v. . Railroad

138 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1905

BROWN, J. , took no part in the decision of this case. … R. , 174 N.C. 352 , 353 ; Brown v. R. R. , ib., 697; Avery v. Palmer , 175 N.C. 381 ; Lea v. Utilities Co., ib. , 463; Davis v. R. R. ib. , 652; Brady v. Lumber Co., ib. , 706; Hudson v. R.