Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTX

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • Hallmark v. City of Fredericksburg

    94 S.W.3d 703 · Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · Nov 21, 2002

    Durst, and Officer Castaneda in their individual capacities, we must decide whether the officers are entitled to qualified immunity. … In determining whether qualified immunity applies in the context of excessive force, we look to whether the plaintiff has suffered (1) an injury (2) which resulted directly and only from the use of force that was clearly

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Mark Goloby and Richard Vega v. Lesley Briones, Adrian Garcia, Lina Hidalgo, Rodney Ellis, and Tom Ramsey, All in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Harris County Commissioners' Court

    Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Apr 16, 2026

    immunity.” … Typically, that means a plaintiff suing a governmental entity or official-capacity defendant bears the burden of establishing that an immunity waiver applies or that the official-capacity defendant acted ultra vires.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reyna v. City of Weslaco

    944 S.W.2d 657 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Feb 27, 1997

    Appellants argue that qualified immunity is an affirmative defense not available to officials sued in their official capacities. … Qualified immunity is available only to officials sued in their personal capacities. Graham, 473 U.S. at 166-67 , 105 S.Ct. at 3105-06 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Cavazos v. Edgewood Independent School District

    400 F. Supp. 2d 948 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Aug 3, 2005

    Even if the government official’s conduct violates a clearly established right, the official is nonetheless entitled to qualified immunity if his conduct was objectively reasonable. Id. … Qualified Immunity Plaintiffs’ allegation, even if assumed to be true, do not establish a violation of a clearly established right against Defendants.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Payne

    827 F. Supp. 1273 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 29, 1992

    QUALIFIED IMMUNITY DEFENSE Liability can only be imposed on the individual defendants if it is shown that they knew or should have known that their conduct violated a person’s clearly established constitutional rights. … The individual defendants have raised this qualified immunity defense and the Court finds that as a matter of law it should be sustained.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lazaro v. University of Texas Health Science Center

    830 S.W.2d 330 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1992

    The rule is well established that the State, either in its own name or through an agent, is not liable without Legislative waiver of sovereign immunity in suits brought by private citizens. See Missouri Pacific R.R. … Ribble and McNeese are protected by qualified immunity as a matter of law. Appellees are immune from liability under the doctrines of sovereign and qualified immunity. Summary judgment was properly granted.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Kenneth Hill v. Michael Stephens, Charles Britt, Domingo Carrillo, and Abel Leal

    Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Dec 16, 2010

    In addition to finding that Hill’s claims were frivolous, the trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity. [5] Hill has not challenged the finding of immunity. … , provided the official’s conduct does not violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have been aware.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. Heinrich

    52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 689 · Texas Supreme Court · May 1, 2009

    sovereign immunity], declaratory-judgment suits against state officials seeking to establish a contract’s validity, to enforce performance under a contract, or to impose contractual liabilities are suits against the State … See Fen-ell, 248 S.W.3d at 160 (Brister, J., concurring) ("A different case *371 might be presented if the plaintiffs alleged the board was clearly violating some provision of the statute.

    Cited 1,143 timesPublished
  • Thompson Ex Rel. Sustaita v. City of Galveston

    979 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 19, 1997

    QUALIFIED IMMUNITY The individual Defendants in this ease argue that they should not be subjected to suit in their individual capacities because they are protected by the doctrine of qualified immunity. … Clearly, if a plaintiffs claims do not specifically and clearly establish a constitutional violation, the claims against the individual Defendants must be dismissed.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Cantey Hanger, Llp v. Philip Gregory Byrd, Lucy Leasing Co., L.L.C., and Pgb Air, Inc.

    467 S.W.3d 477 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2015

    We hold that the firm established its affirmative defense of attorney immunity as a matter of law and therefore reverse the court of appeals’ judgment. I. … The court held that, although attorneys enjoy qualified immunity from civil liability to non-clients for actions taken in connection with representing a client in litigation, Cantey Hanger was not entitled to such immunity

    Cited 245 timesPublished
  • Elmer Rivera, Kassandra Morales Rodriguez and Isreal Morales v. City of Houston and Veronica Romero

    Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Dec 22, 2020

    Good faith If the officer’s driving qualifies as the performance of a discretionary act, the officer still must act in good faith to qualify for official immunity. See Clark, 38 S.W.3d at 580. … Whether the City established immunity as matter of law based on the emergency exception to immunity waiver The City contends that, even if the trial court erred in granting it summary judgment on official immunity

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Freddie Louis Brewer v. Fawn D. Carl

    Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · Aug 31, 1995

    Carl and Mata assert the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. … Brewer has not established the violation of any statutory or constitutional right and, thus, has failed to overcome Carl's and Mata's qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Robstown, Noe Garza, Julian Olivera, J. B. Talley, and Jorge Luis Aguilar v. Ramirez, Primitivo, Individually, Librado G. Ramirez, Individually and Michelle Ramirez, by and Through Her Next Friend, Primitivo Ramirez

    Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Mar 31, 2000

    assertion of qualified or official immunity in order for the sovereign. … To the extent that Aguilar's argument on appeal is based on qualified immunity, we are unable to consider it as he did not raise the issues of res judicata or collateral estoppel within an argument of qualified immunity in

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Liberty County Officers Ass'n v. Stewart

    903 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Jul 20, 1995

    Harlow and its progeny use qualified immunity to protect state officials for alleged constitutional torts if their conduct does not violate clearly established law effective at the time of the alleged tort. … Plaintiffs maintain that their factual allegations demonstrate defendants violated clearly established law.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Teitel v. University of Houston Board of Regents

    285 F. Supp. 2d 865 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 31, 2002

    they are entitled to either official or qualified immunity. … “Clearly established,” for purposes of qualified immunity, means that “[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Noe v. Stockwell

    630 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Mar 19, 1986

    These pleadings, together with the transcript, raise substantial fact questions regarding whether or not clearly established constitutional law as set forth in the following cases and regulation was violated: Pell v. … immunity to be submitted to the jury, without an interlocutory appeal being taken on the issue of qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. Gonzales

    824 S.W.2d 685 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 23, 1992

    Appellant filed a motion for summary judgment based on her individual qualified immunity from liability and suit. The trial court denied the motion. Appellant then perfected this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Tex. … Such a result would be in direct contravention with the purpose of quasi-judicial immunity. Appellant is protected by qualified immunity as a matter of law and is not liable to Gonzales for any negligent acts.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Leyva v. Soltero

    966 S.W.2d 765 · Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Mar 26, 1998

    which relies upon its employees’ claim of official immunity. 3 Here, both Officer Leyva and his employer, the City of Clint, moved for summary judgment claiming official “qualified” immunity and sovereign immunity. … City established the other elements of official immunity.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tiemeyer v. Zaika

    947 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Apr 23, 1996

    established. … Child welfare investigators enjoy only qualified immunity. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reyes v. North Texas Tollway Authority

    830 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 14, 2011

    Qualified Immunity The individual defendants also argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity. … Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages *210 insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.