Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

3.75s

  • Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co. v. Brown

    22 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1908

    In the case of De Graffenreid v. … Apptying the principles laid down in the cases of George v. Bobb et al. and De Graffenreid v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Brown

    195 Okla. 345 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945

    In the case of Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. … Ry. v. DeVore, 43 Okla. 534 , 143 P. 864 ; Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Bartrand, 129 Okla. 263 , 264 P. 621 ; 46 A.L.R. 1230 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown

    170 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1934

    In Tanner v. … H. 217; Cosselmen v. Dunfee, 172 N. Y. 507 , 65 N. B. 494; Manigold v. Black River T. Co., 80 N. Y. Supp. 861 ; Eckhart & Swan M. Co. v. Schaefer, 101 Ill. App. 500 ; Herrin v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown

    170 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1934

    In Harrah State Bank v. … Johnson et al. v. United Rys. Co. et al., 247 Mo. 326 , 152 S. W. 362 ; Pye v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co. (Cal.) 227 P. 193 . In White v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Oklahoma Transportation Co.

    588 P.2d 595 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1978

    John’s Hosp. & School of Nursing, Inc. v. Chapman, Okl., 434 P.2d 160 (1967); Nebo Oil Co. v. … Lamp v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown

    177 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936

    Brown. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Oklahoma City

    721 P.2d 1346 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1986

    Walters v. State, 403 P.2d 267 (OkLCr. 1965); Davis v. State, 53 Okl.Cr. 411 , 12 P.2d 555 (1932). … A good discussion of the problem is in Retherford v. Halliburton Co., 572 P.2d 966 (Okl.1977); see also Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 669 P.2d 768 (Okl.1983). . Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sterling Milk Products Co. v. Brown

    173 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935

    (Sterling Milk Products Company v. Brown, 146 Okla. 302 , 294 P. 117 .) … This court, in Orwig et al. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harness v. McKee-brown Lumber Co.

    17 Okla. 624 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1907

    .: This action was brought by' the McKee-Brown Lumber Company in the district court of Oklahoma county against I). E. … with Gillespie & Son,' contractors and builders, to erect a dwelling house for him at. the price and sum of $2,562.00; that said Gillespie & Son were to furnish all the material and construct said house; that the McKee-Brown

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Stephenson-Brown Lumber Co.

    14 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1904

    In the case of Blanchard v. Schwartz, 7 Okla. 23 , this court says: “Mechanics Lien. Statement of Sufficiency. … Now in this case we find on page 11, the following statement: “Stephenson Brown Lbr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brown

    180 Okla. 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1937

    BAYLESS, V. C. J. Maud L. Brown, formerly Garletts, claiming to be the bene-fici'ary named in a benefit certificate issued to her son, Fred O. … Clarke v. Lockstone, 170 Okla. 316 , 39 P. (2d) 971 ; Cromwell v. Ream, supra, and Gungoll v. Elsberry, 177 Okla. 301 . 58 P. (2d) 852 , and other cases.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Phillips Pipe Line Company v. Brown

    301 P.2d 689 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1956

    Claimant, Hardy Brown, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that while employed by Phillips Pipe Line Company he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment … In Liberty Glass Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Dunnaway

    207 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1952

    Brown was not discharged by the old library board. … Lowden v. Washita County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 708 , 100 P. 2d 459 . In another enactment, 11 O.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Joe Brown Co., Inc. v. Best

    601 P.2d 755 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1979

    Estes v. Oklahoma City, 175 Okl. 278 , 52 P.2d 873 , 874 (per curiam) (syllabus ¶ 3). (Another holding in this case, found in syllabus ¶ 4, was overruled to the extent conflicting in Board of Trustees v. … Newbern v. Farris, 149 Okl. 74 , 299 P. 192 . See also Brown v. Magers, Okl., 359 P.2d 321, 327 . In their second proposition the Bests argue two alleged errors. The first is that since Mr. and Mrs.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cross Ex Rel. Cross v. Brown

    363 P.2d 935 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1961

    Brown he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on January 31, 1960. … Brown, and Sinclair Refining Company to review the order denying the award.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sterling Milk Products Co. v. Brown

    146 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930

    With this contention we cannot agree, for, as is said in the first paragraph of j:he syllabus of Simpson v. … The defendant tendered proof that there was no liability on its part by reason of the damages claimed to have been suffered by Cecil Brown, plaintiff in the action, and further, that Cecil Brown suffered no damage upon which

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • MIDLAND CO-OP. WHOLESALE v. Brown

    207 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1952

    Brown, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that while employed by Midland Co-Operative Wholesale, hereinafter called employer, he sustained an accidental injury … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Brown

    39 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1913

    Brown against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while attempting to apply some dressing to a belt in one of the defendant’s gins. *246 The defendant assigns as error … See Humphrey v. Morgan, 30 Okla. 343 , 120 Pac. 577 ; Dunlap v. Flowers, 21 Okla. 600 , 96 Pac. 643 ; Bales v. N. W. Consol. Milling Co., 21 Okla. 421 , 96 Pac. 599 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Spence v. Brown-Minneapolis Tank, Co.

    198 P.3d 395 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 2008

    Bliss Div., 201 N.J.Super. 205 , 492 A.2d 1089, 1100 (1985); Bailey v. ITT Grinnell Corp., 536 F.Supp. 84, 89 (N.D.Ohio 1982); Bevard v. Ajax Mfg. Co., 473 F.Supp. 35, 39 (E.D.Mich.1979); Bruce v. … (Okl.) 1976); Siemen v. Alden, 34 Ill.App.3d 961 , 341 N.E.2d 713, 715 (1975); McKenna v. Art Pearl Works, Inc., 225 Pa.Super. 362 , 310 A.2d 677, 680, fn. 2 (Pa.Super.1973); Balido v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

    108 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1925

    Lee v. Little, 81 Okla. 168 , 197 Pac. 449 . … Justice Williams, Farmers’ National Bank of Tecumseh v. McCall. 25 Okla. 600 , 106 Pac. 866 , which ruling was followed in the cases of Taylor v. Wooden, 30 Okla. 6 , 118 Pac. 372 ; Midland Valley Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.