Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.16s

  • Endsley v. Wolfe Camera Supply Corp.

    44 N.C. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1979

    Sink v. Easter, 288 N.C. 183 , 217 S.E. 2d 532 (1975); Harrington v. Harrington, 38 N.C. App. 610 , 248 S.E. 2d 460 (1978); Burwell v. Wilkerson, 30 N.C. App. 110 , 226 S.E. 2d 220 (1976). … A California case, Miller v. Lee, 52 Cal.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    135 N.C. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1999

    State v. … State v. Munsey, 342 N.C. 882, 885 , 467 S.E.2d 425, 427 (1996) (citation omitted).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Biggs v. Edgecombe County Public School Board of Education

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 6, 2020

    Ex. 1 to Board’s Mot. to Strike, D.E. 149–1. … Majestic Distilling Co., Inc. v. Stanley Stawski Distrib. Co., 205 F.3d 1333, 2000 WL 227919, *4 (4th Cir. 2000) (unpublished table decision); see also Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Headman v. . Commissioners

    177 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1919

    Not longer than the last *Page 284 term of this Court it was said by Justice Brown in Yates v. Dixie Fire Ins. … S. c. , 143 N.C. 384 ; Eames v. Armstrong , 146 N.C. 6 ; Warren v. Williford , 148 N.C. 479 ; Rexford v. Phillips , 159 N.C. 213 ; Board of Education v. Remick , 160 N.C. 563 ; McNair v. Boyd , 163 N.C. 478 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.

    199 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2002

    NCAA v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85 , 109 n. 38, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984). … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.

    235 N.C. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014

    v. … Accord Moore v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Guano Company v. . Hicks

    120 N.C. 29 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

    Rosenthal v. Robertson, 114 N. C., 594 ; Delafield v. Construction Co., 115 N. C., 21 ; Worthy v. Brady, 91 N. C., 265 ; Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 642 ; Chamblee v. Baker, 95. N C., 98; Walker v. Scott, 104. … Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 ; Shober v. Wheeler, 119 N. C., 471 ; Owens v. Phelps, 91 N. C., 253 ; Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 ; Stephens v. Koonce, 106 N. C., 255 ; Porter v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

    123 F. Supp. 2d 883 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 4, 2000

    Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Accord Dennis v. County of Fairfax, 55 F.3d 151, 156 (4th Cir.1995); and EEOC v. … Id. at 278, 450 S.E.2d at 756 , quoting Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C.App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. rev. den., 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). 2 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wright v. Wal-Mart Stores

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 16, 2007

    Brown was never made aware of the incident at work. … *Page 7 Stat. § 97-2 (6); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980); Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 (2003). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Kelly

    120 N.C. App. 821 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995

    Upon delivery, the undercover officer told defendant Gardner that he had a package for Randy Brown and Gardner stated that he was Randy Brown, and signed for the package “Randy Borwn [sic].” … State v. Cousins, 289 N.C. 540, 550-51 , 223 S.E.2d 338, 345 (1976).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • v. Brown's Executors

    2 N.C. 260 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1795

    - v. Brown’s Executors. The indisposition of a witness, whose deposition has been talcen de bene esse and was now offered to be read, cannot be proved by the oath of the party producing it. … The Defendant produced very strong circumstances to show, that the instrument purporting tobe signed by Brown, in acknowledgment of the receipt of this money, was forged.

    Cited 0 timesPublishedText from a scan
  • Sink v. Egerton

    76 N.C. App. 526 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1985

    Plaintiff cites Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940) and Blanton v. Sisk, 70 N.C. App. 70 , 318 S.E. 2d 560 (1984) in support of her proposition that N.C. Gen. Stat. … Moreover, a majority of our Supreme Court has recently rejected the reasoning in Brown. Barnaby v. Boardman, 313 N.C. 565 , 330 S.E. 2d 600 (1985).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • The Clara A. McIntyre

    94 F. 552 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 17, 1899

    Place, 6 Cow. 431 ; Ward v. Van Bokkelen, 2 Paige, 289 . … In Burnes v. Scott, 117 U. S. 588 , 6 Sup.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. . Presley

    35 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1852

    His Honor, in charging the jury in this case, entiiely overlooked that of the State v. Thomas, 7 Ire. 381. That was an action upon a Sheriff’s bond, and the plaintiff made out a prima facie case. … The only difference is, that, in this the jury are informed, that the only thing that could save the witness Brown from the crime of perjury, if his statement was false, was that his mind was unsound.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cromartie v. Choptank Transport

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 2, 2007

    Brown was the only medical expert to testify in this matter. Although Dr. … Holly v. Acts, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 , 581 S.E.2d 750 (2003). The plaintiff has failed to prove that his back condition was caused by or aggravated by his alleged injury by accident on June 13, 2003.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cities4life, Inc. v. City of Charlotte

    341 F. Supp. 3d 621 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

    Doe v. Va. Dep't of State Police , 713 F.3d 745 , 758 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Miller v. Brown , 462 F.3d 312 , 319 (4th Cir. 2006) ). … Although the State Board argued that further review by the Board was needed before the claim could become ripe, the Fourth Circuit found that the State Board had already "manifested its views" that the regulations applied

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Cromwell

    247 F. 207 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 10, 1917

    In Dutton v. The Express, 3 Clif. 462, Fed. Cas. … Judge Holmes, referring to Sturgis v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Matter of Rogers

    297 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1979

    Accord Martin-Trigona v. Underwood, 529 F. 2d 33 (7th Cir. 1975); State v. … Underwood v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 278 N.C. 623 , 181 S.E. 2d 1 (1971).

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Blankenship v. Bartlett

    639 S.E.2d 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Wilkins

    294 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1978

    Konigsberg v. … In State v.

    Criticized on other grounds by In Re Guess, 324 N.C. 105 (1989)Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.