Case law

Triplett v. Grundy Electric Cooperative, Inc.

389 S.W.2d 401 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1965

In Putnam v. … Louis v. City of St. Louis, Mo.App., 294 S.W.2d 676 .

Kitchen v. Hawley

150 Mo. App. 497 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1910

[Sanders v. Dixon, 114 Mo. App. 229, 253 , 89 S. W. 577 ; Kitching v. Brown, 180 N. Y. 414, 427 ; Lloyd on Building (2 Ed.), sec. 148.] … [Hurley v. Brown, 44 N. Y. App. Div. 480, 483; Lloyd on Building (2 Ed.), sec. 148; Pank v. Eaton, 115 Mo. App. 171 , 89 S. W. 586 .]

State v. White

316 Mo. 576 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 24, 1927

[State v. Delbert Midkiff, 286 S. W. 20 ; State v. Frank Midkiff, 278 S. W. 681 .] … [State v. Brown, 73 Mo. 631 ; Couley v. State, 12 Mo. 462 ; State v. Keller, 263 Mo. l. c. 557; 16 C. J. 726.] In each of those cases cited the inducement was no stronger than that which appears in this case.

Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Dubach

82 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Gist v. Eubank, 29 Mo. 248 ; Gardner v. Armstrong, 31 Mo. 535 ; Sherwood v. Saxton, 63 Mo. 78 . … In Farmers and Drovers’ Bank v.

Weber v. Firemen's Retirement System

872 S.W.2d 477 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 22, 1994

Captain Weber now asserts the Board’s decision necessarily was invalid for *479 its failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. II A. Our recent decision in Byrd v. … We may have painted with too broad a brush in Hagely v.

Ketring v. Sturges

372 S.W.2d 104 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 11, 1963

McKittrick v. Gate City Optical Co., 339 Mo. 427 , 97 S.W.2d 89 ; 2 Bennett v. Indiana State Board of R. & E. in Optometry, 211 Ind. 678 , 7 N.E.2d 977 ; Kay Jewelry Co. v. … Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S.W.2d 943, 949 .

Common School Dist. No. 27 v. Brinkmann

233 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1950

has been decided by our Supreme Court in Dye v. … Shelton v. Franklin, 224 Mo. 342, 368 , 123 S.W. 1084 .

Hogan v. Fleming

218 Mo. App. 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1924

It was proper to show that he thought the street car would stop at least prior to its reaching the docks (Vansickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627, 634 ), whether or not it was proper to show what he thought after that time. … [Duffy v. K. C. Rys. Co., supra; Michaels v. Railroad, supra; Green v. United Rys. Co., supra; Taylor v. Railroad, supra.]

Harrisburg R-VIII School District v. O'Brian

540 S.W.2d 945 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1976

Leggett v. … School Dist. v. Bryner, 148 Pa.Super. 549 , 25 A.2d 745 (1942); Griggs v. Board of Trustees of Merced Union H.S.

State v. Johnson

163 Mo. App. 41 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1912

This case is similar in many respects to that of State of Missouri v. Pete Brown et al., decided this day. … We covered that point fully in the opinion in the' Brown case and reference thereto is made for the discussion.

Michael J. Holmes, Appellant, vs. Kenneth Zellers, Andrew Bailey, Mayor Tishaura Jones, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard Gray, Thomas Irwin, Erwin Switzer, Francis Slay, and City of St. Louis, Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2025

Louis v. State, 711 S.W.3d 559 (Mo. App. … The case settled again in 2019 and the City, as the Board’s successor, paid the judgment for the Board’s misconduct. Id. See also City of St. Louis v. State, No. ED 112349, 2024 WL 4018268, at *1 (Mo. App.

Vilelle v. Reorganized School District No. R-1

689 S.W.2d 72 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1985

In Lopez v. … Street v. Ferndale Board of Education, 361 Mich. 82, 86-87 , 104 N.W.2d 748 (1960).

Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.

603 S.W.2d 627 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 27, 1980

A loss of $29,444.00 for the first quarter of 1968 was reported in an April 30, 1968 board meeting. Respondent Sweaney attended all of these board meetings. … Willis v. City of Browning, 161 Mo.App. 461, 464 , 143 S.W. 516, 517 [3—4] (1912).

Hailey v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

599 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1984

See Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Kansas City Fibre Box Co., 35 F.2d 822, 823 (6th Cir.1929), cert. den., 281 U.S. 730 , 50 S.Ct. 247 , 74 L.Ed. 1147 (1930); and see also Meekison v. … Arnold Savings Bank, 411 S.W.2d 159, 163-65 (Mo.1966) (en banc); Knight v. M.H. Siegfried Real Estate, Inc., 647 S.W.2d 811, 814 (Mo.App.1982); Fischer v. Browne, 586 S.W.2d 733, 736-37 (Mo. App.1979).

Porter v. Rea

6 Mo. 48 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1839

. - . . , , His interest is decidedly against the party calling ton,, Graham and others v O’Fallon ex’r. 4 Mo. R. 338. … In Whitaker v Brown [8 Wend, 490] where the coufit excluded evidence of the assignors declarations and admis* *49 sions; it was upon the ground that the assignor was a competent witness, and being such, the opposite party

John Chasnoff, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Col. Joseph Mokwa, Wendell Ishmon v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, and John Chasnoff, Intervenor Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 2015

Curtice v. Schmidt

202 Mo. 703 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 28, 1907

Joseph ex rel. v. Landis, 54 Mo. App. 315 ; Clapton v. Taylor, 49 Mo. App. 117 ; German Bank v. Stumpf, 73 Mo. 315 ; State v. Green, 66 Mo. 631 .] … Co. v. *720 Frost, 90 Mo. App. 677 ; United States v. Martin, 94 U. S. 400 ; State v. Holden, 14 Utah 71 ; Com. v. Hamilton Mfg. Co., 120 Mass. 383 ; People v. Warren, 77 Hun 120 ; State v.

Hudson v. School District of Kansas City

578 S.W.2d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1979

Pulitzer v. … Philipp Transit v.

Archey v. Carnahan

373 S.W.3d 528 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2012

Prosecuting Attorneys v. Barton Cnty., 311 S.W.3d 737, 740 (Mo. banc 2010); Overfelt v. McCaskill, 81 S.W.3d 732, 735 (Mo.App. … League v. Carnahan, 303 S.W.3d 573, 580 (Mo.App. W.D.2010).

Hammond's Administratrix v. Cadwallader

29 Mo. 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1859

The case 'of Brown v. Dyrenger, 1 Rawle, 413 ; McCulloch v. Cowhe, 5 W. & S. 431 ; Lees v. Nuttall, 1 Russell & Mylne, 53; Kisler v. Kisler, 2 Watts, 427 , and Schmidt v. Gatewood, 2 Rich. … (Robertson v. Robertson, 9 Watts, 36 ; Haines v. O’Connor, 10 Watts, 320 ; Fox v. Heffner, 1 Serg. & R. 376; Lloyd v. Spillet, 2 Atk. 148.)