Case law

AHCI, Inc. v. Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc.

898 S.W.2d 191 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 1, 1995

The plaintiffs cited two cases — Brinkley v. Wolcott, 57 Tenn. 22 (Tenn.1872) and Russells Factory Stores, Inc. v. Fielden Furniture Co., 33 Tenn.App. 688 , 232 S.W.2d 592 (1950) — to support this proposition. … See Revlon Group Inc. v.

Michael D. Matthews v. Natasha Story

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 28, 2003

See Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 12 S.W.3d 785, 787 (Tenn. 2000). … Brown, 12 S.W.3d at 787-88 (quoting McIntyre, 833 S.W.2d at 58). The Brown Court pointed out that the legislature responded to one aspect of McIntyre by enacting Tenn.

Roy L. Tidwell and Richard Coggins v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court · May 19, 2006

Sept. 15, 1986), city councils, see Huddleston, 635 S.W.2d at 694, pension boards, see Love v. Ret. Sys. of the City of Memphis, 1987 WL 17246 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 1987), boards of education, see Cunningham v. … Oct. 1, 1986), and boards of health, see Goodwin v. Metro. Bd. of Health, 656 S.W.2d 383 (Tenn. Ct.

Frank A. McCray v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 9, 2004

In making his claim, the petitioner relies on the case of State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. 1992). … The petitioner submits that the jury instruction concerning premeditation and deliberation that was used in his case was identical to the one used in the Brown case. In Miller v.

Ballentine v. Wright

75 Tenn. 26 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1881

The. power of sale is coupled with a trust in favor of this legatee, not a mere discretionary power, and will be executed by the court: Robertson v. Gaines, 2 Hum., 367 ; Brown v. Higgs, 8 Ves., 574; Godolphin v. … Brown.” This amended will recognizes and republishes the-previous will, and so changes it as is specially provided. The general object of the testator is, perhaps,, clear.

Broyles v. Synercon Corp.

512 S.W.2d 288 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1974

In the summer of 1971, an optionee other than the plaintiff, Broyles, requested the Board of Directors to construe Section V(e). … The Board determined that its original intent was to limit the optionee to accrued shares under Section V(c).

Eledge v. Dixon

193 Tenn. 654 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1952

Green v. Allen, 24 Tenn. 170 ; Henshaw v. Flenniken, 183 Tenn. 232 , 191 S. W. (2d) 541 , 168 A. L. R. 1010; and Ratto v. Nashville Trust Co., 178 Tenn. 457 , 159 S. W. (2d) 88 , 141 A. L. R. 341. … State v. Smith, 16 Lea, [84 Tenn.] [662] 670; Perry on Trusts, Secs. 744, 700; Dickson v. Montgomery , 1 *665 Swan [31 Tenn.] 348; Gass v. Boss, 3 Sneed [35 Tenn.] 346 [211]; * * * State, ex rel. T. J. Duncan, v.

Corey A. Adams v. Tennessee Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 5, 2013

The limited court review of prison disciplinary board proceedings was explained in Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Bd., 879 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) as being “very narrow.” … It covers only an inquiry into whether the Board has exceeded its jurisdiction or is acting illegally, fraudulently, or arbitrarily, Yokley v. State, 632 S.W.2d 123 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981).

Leas, Anthony v. Opus Inspection, Inc., et al.

2016 TN WC App. 15 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 30, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Anthony Leas ) Docket No. 2015-05-0415 ) v. … Buchanan v. Carlex Glass, No. 2015-01-0012, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2015).

Ronnie Summey v. Monroe County Department of Education

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 29, 2012

See Davidson v. Davidson, 916 S.W.2d 918 922-23 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). The entire written agreement must be considered. D. & E. Const. Co. v. Robert J. … Farmers-Peoples Bank v. Clemmer, 519 S.W.2d 801, 805 (Tenn. 1975). Maggart v. Almany Realtors, Inc., 259 S.W.3d 700, 703-04 (Tenn. 2008).

Melvin Perry v. Bruce Westbrooks

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 7, 2007

Review under a writ of certiorari is limited to whether the inferior board or tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. McCallen v. … Hall v. McLesky, 83 S.W.3d 752, 757 (Tenn.Ct.App.2001) (citing Boyce v. Williams, 389 S.W.2d 272, 277 (1965)). I.

Larry W. Hopkins v. Bd. of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2001

HOPKINS v. … The courts have held repeatedly that the Board may consider the seriousness of a prisoner’s offense when making parole decisions. Arnold v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d at 482; Robinson v.

Percy Galbreath & Son, Inc. v. Dehyco Co.

548 S.W.2d 664 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 23, 1976

Bailey & Co. v. Union Planters Title Guaranty Co. (1949) 33 Tenn.App. 439 , 232 S.W.2d 309 , controls this lawsuit on the issue of the plaintiff’s right to a commission based upon the new leases. … It happens that the Real Estate Board at that time prescribed 5% and it is for that which Appellant prays.

Goodman, Robert v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC

2022 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 28, 2022

See Moore & Seiferth v. Ingles Markets, Inc., No. 2015-02-0193, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 54, at *4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Nov. 4, 2015). … Yarbrough v. Protective Servs. Co., Inc., No. 2015-08-0574, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 25, 2016); see also Burnette v. WestRock, No. 2016-01-0670, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.

Noel, Darlene v. EAN Holdings, LLC

2017 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 19, 2017

Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02-0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. May 18, 2015). … See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).

Wigdor, Brad v. Electric Research & Manufacturing Cooperative, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 53 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 21, 2023

) ) Appeal from the Court of Workers’ ) Compensation Claims ) Robert V. … In Pope v.

City of Memphis v. Adams, Dixon & Pike

56 Tenn. 518 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

In the case of Whyte v. … Rex v. Biggs, 3 Pierre Williams, 419. In the case of Bank of Columbia v.

Wagner v. Haslam

112 F. Supp. 3d 673 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 12, 2015

V. … The defendants argue that two post-Haines cases from Tennessee state courts indicate that a board of education can sue or be sued in certain contexts. See S. Constructors, Inc. v. Loudon Cnty.

Thomas Jackson v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 8, 2004

Hall v. McLesky, 83 S.W.3d 752, 757 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001) (citing Boyce v. Williams, 389 S.W.2d 272, 277 (1965)). 1. … Hall v. McLesky, 83 S.W.3d 752, 757 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001) (citing Boyce v. Williams, 389 S.W.2d 272, 277 (1965)).

State v. Darnell

905 S.W.2d 953 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 1995

What is apparent from Royer and Brown [v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) ] is that police questioning, by itself, is unlikely to result in a Fourth Amendment violation. … The Tennessee Supreme Court recently addressed the issues of premeditation and deliberation in State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn.1992), and further addressed premeditation in State v.