Case law

State v. Stevens

252 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1960

S. v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605 , 55 S.E. 2d 79 ; S. v. Crump, 209 N.C. 52 , 182 S. E. 716 . Moreover, the law does not sanction a conditional plea of nolo con-tendere. S. v. Horne, 234 N.C. 115 , 66 S.E. 2d 665 ; S. v. … The defendants contend that the judgments are void; that the law prescribes a sentence not in excess of twelve months for larceny from the person, citing S. v. Brown, 150 N.C. 867 , 64 S.E. 775 .

Schwartz v. NCNB Corp.

768 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 28, 1991

See, e.g., Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co., 72 F.R.D. 48 (M.D.N.C.1976). … For example, paragraph 24 states in its entirety: “On or about December 20, 1988, NCNB issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors had declared a dividend on its series B Cumulative Preferred Stock of $1.00

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.

199 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2002

NCAA v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85 , 109 n. 38, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984). … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Hobbs v. County of Moore

267 N.C. 665 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1966

State v. Morrison, 210 N.C. 117 , 185 S.E. 674 ; State v. Partlow, 91 N.C. 550 ; Drake v. Drake, 15 N.C. 110 . … In Lowery v.

King v. Baldwin

276 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 11, 1970

Snow v. Board of Architecture, 273 N.C. 559 , 160 S.E. 2d 719 ; Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E. 2d 758 ; St. George v. Hanson, 239 N.C. 259 , 78 S.E. 2d 885 ; Harris v. … Board of Education, 216 N.C. 147 , 4 S.E. 2d 328 ; Moreland v. Wamboldt, 208 N.C. 35 , 179 S.E. 9 ; Hickory v. Catawba Co., 206 N.C. 165 , 173 S.E. 56 ; Bunn v. Maxwell, 199 N.C. 557 , 155 S.E. 250 .

State v. Andrews

52 N.C. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1981

We have become advertent to Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977), and do not find it controlling. … As we previously noted in Brown v.

State v. Harrington

335 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1993

The court dismissed Juror Brown. It asked counsel to offer any objections, but none were made. Defendant argues that State v. Drake, 31 N.C. … State v. Bonney, 329 N.C. 61, 83 , 405 S.E.2d 145, 158 (1991). As to juror Brown, the court dismissed him.

Byers v. . Byers

223 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Reynolds v. Reynolds , 208 N.C. 428 , 181 S.E. 338 ; Brown v. Brown , 213 N.C. 347 , 196 S.E. 333 ; Hyder v. Hyder , 215 N.C. 239 , 1 S.E.2d 540 . … Medlin v. Medlin , 175 N.C. 529 , 95 S.E. 857 ; Brown v. Brown , 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Price v. Edwards , 178 N.C. 493 , 101 S.E. 33 ; 30 Am.Jur., 925.

Burgin v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

115 N.C. 673 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

Browne v. Railroad Co., 108 N. C., 34 ; Hutchinson on Carriers. sec. 641. In Lambeth v. Railroad Co., 66 N. … Walker v. Railroad Co., 41 La. Am., 795; Jewell v. Railroad, 54 Wis., 610 ; Railroad Co. v. Morris, 31 Grat., 200; Nelson v. Railroad, 68 Mo., 593 ; 2 Wood’s Railway Law, 1133.

Leandro v. State

122 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1996

In Board of Education v. … Id. at 289 , 357 S.E.2d at 436 (citing Sneed v. Board of Education, 299 N.C. 609, 618 , 264 S.E.2d 106, 113 (1980)).

State v. Crandell

247 N.C. App. 771 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

This case is distinguishable both from [State v. Fleming, 106 N.C. App. 165, 415 S.E.2d 782 (1992)] and from [Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 61 L. … Supreme Court in Brown was careful to distinguish the facts in - 17 -  STATE V.

State v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2020

In Brown v. … After determining the primary purpose of the checking station is lawful, the trial court is required to follow the three-prong inquiry set out in Brown v. Texas 443 U.S. 47, 61 L.

State v. . Wilson

218 N.C. 769 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1941

In S. v. … rear, before Browning could get on the shoulders, he having seen defendant coming at a fast rate of speed through his rear-view mirror.

McLane v. . Manning

60 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

Edney v. King , 39 N.C. 465 ; Lackay v. Curtis , 41 N.C. 199 . … Cited: Harshaw v. McCombs , 63 N.C. 77 ; Gilmer v. Hanks , 84 N.C. 320 ; Stout v. McNeill , 98 N.C. 3 ; Anderson v. Rainey , 100 N.C. 334 .

Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.

235 N.C. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014

v. … Accord Moore v.

Goshen Road Environmental Action v. United States Department of Agriculture

891 F. Supp. 1126 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 1995

The plaintiffs contend that the lagoon is located less than 500 feet from the property of the Goshen Road residents, including the plaintiffs Iris Brown and Hattie Brown. … Also, in Guardians Ass’n v.

Heath v. Heath

132 N.C. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1999

. § 50-20(e) (1995) as establishing a presumption favoring an in kind distribution of marital property, and this Court’s decision in Brown v. Brown, 112 N.C. … See Byrd v. Owens, 86 N.C.

State v. Traub

197 N.C. App. 761 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2009

State v. Watkins, 337 N.C. 437, 441 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 70 (1994) (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 906 (1968)). … See State v.

McKee v. Crescent Spinning Co.

54 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

In Taylor v. J. P. … McTesson made his “brown lung” diagnosis.

Brevard Land & Timber Co. v. Kinsland

154 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1910

C., 639 ; S. v. R. R., 141 N. C., 846 ) ; but its physical location must remain the subject-matter of proof. … Assuming, as we must from the records accessible to us and considered by this Court in Brown v. Brown, 103 N. C., 213 ; s. c., on rehearing, 103 N. C., 221 , and Brown v. Brown, 106 N.