Case law

State ex rel. Foster v. McKenzie

683 S.W.2d 270 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1984

Teefey v. Teefey, 533 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Mo. banc 1976). On imprisonment for civil contempt, the con-temnor in a sense has the key to his cell in his pocket, Brown v. … Huber v. Huber, 649 S.W.2d 955, 958 (Mo.App.1983); Mechanic v. Gruensfelder, 461 S.W.2d 298, 304 (Mo.App.1970).

Estate of Thomson v. Thomson

362 Mo. 1043 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1952

Williams and, in turn, Mooers v. White is cited in Gunby v. Brown. Respondents say that our decision in Gunby v. … Jones v. McGonigle, supra; Gunby v. Brown, supra.

Aaron Stock v. Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement Fund of the City of Richmond Heights, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2025

Hartle v. Ozark Cable Contracting, 291 S.W.3d 814, 817 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009); see also Callahan v. … Harvey v. Washington, 95 S.W.3d 93, 96 (Mo. 2003) (quoting Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hosp., 863 S.W.2d 852, 862 (Mo. 1993)); see also, e.g., Hensley v.

Farmer v. Taylor

301 S.W.2d 429 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1957

With the moving operation thus in progress, the west half of McCarty was blocked by the wrecker, and the ■east half of McCarty was blocked by the pulley cable, which was rusty brown in color, about three feet above ground … Immediately prior to his injury, he had “dropped down to put a board underneath the front dolly wheel”; but, when he heard what “sounded like four or five hollering” — “just hollering to stop the man from going through the

Naturopathic Laboratories International, Inc. v. Dermal Research Laboratories, Inc.

415 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 2006

See Mathieu v. Gopher News Co., 273 F.3d 769, 776 (8th Cir.2001); Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co., 72 F.3d 648, 655 (8th Cir.1995). … Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209, 242 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993); see also Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1057 (8th Cir.2000); Morgenstern v.

Hinkeldey v. Cities Service Oil Company

470 S.W.2d 494 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

Roberts Bros., Mo.Sup., 218 S.W.2d 592 , for the proposition that reliance upon what had been done in previous years does not give rise to a contractual obligation; Brown v. … Industrial Commission, Mo.App., 309 S.W.2d 676 ; Brown v.

Wrightsman v. Gideon

296 Mo. 214 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1922

[State ex rel. v. County Court, 41 Mo. 453 ].” [Lang v. Calloway, 68 Mo. App. l. c. 396; approved, Gasconade Co. v. Gordon, 241 Mo. l. c. 582.] Repeals by implication are not favored. [State ex rel. v. … [State v. Morrow, 26 Mo. 131 .]

Carlyle v. Missouri Department of Corrections

184 S.W.3d 76 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2005

MDOC and the Chairman of the Probation and Parole Board appeal from the judgment. … Nixon v. Russell, 129 S.W.3d 867 .

State v. Romprey

339 S.W.2d 746 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960

State v. Burns, Mo.Sup., 328 S.W.2d 711. … Brown, that you will not speak out and argue in front of the jury.

Ripkey v. Gresham

279 Mo. 521 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 27, 1919

[Monroe v. Crawford, 163 Mo. 178 ; Baubie v. Ossman, 142 Mo. 499 ; Baker v. Squire, 143 Mo. l. c. 99.] … PER CURIAM: The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court; all of the judges concur.

Carroll v. State

131 S.W.3d 907 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2004

In so concluding, we do not ignore cases upon which Movant relies, namely Moore, 934 S.W.2d 289 and Brown v. State, 968 S.W.2d 725 (Mo.App.1998). The Moore opinion dealt with two cases. … Brown, 968 S.W.2d at 726 . Obviously, those are not the facts of this case; consequently, Brown is inap-posite.

State ex rel. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Koehr

834 S.W.2d 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1992

Co. v. Gallagher, 811 S.W.2d 353 (Mo. banc 1991). … Miller’s Mutual Insurance Association v.

State v. Simpson

718 S.W.2d 143 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1986

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 698 (Mo.1983) (en banc), citing State v. Downs, 593 S.W.2d 535, 542 (Mo.1980), and State v. Eaton, 504 S.W.2d 12, 16 (Mo.1973). … According to State v. Brown, supra, 660 S.W.2d at 699 , citing State v.

La Crosse Lumber Co. v. Schwartz

163 Mo. App. 659 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 13, 1912

[Devers v. Howard, supra; City of Bethany v. Howard, supra.] … [Board of Education v. Fidelity Co., 155 Mo. App. 109 ; Harburg v. Kumpf, 151 Mo. 16 .]

Cooper v. School District of Kansas City

362 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1951

Young v. Brassfield, supra; Hurtgen v. *54 Gasche, (Mo.) 223 S. W. (2), 493; White v. Boyne, 324 Mo. 176 , 23 S. W. (2) 107. Compares State ex rel. De Weese v. Morris, 359 Mo. 194 ; 221 S. W. (2) 206; Salvation Army v. … W. (2) 561; Butler v. Board of Education of Consol. School Dist. No. 1, (Mo.) 16 S. W. (2) 44; Kellams v. Compton, (Mo.) 206 S. W. (2) 498; Aquamsi Land Co. v. Cape Girardeau, 346 Mo. 524 , 142 S. W. (2) 332.

Hendon v. Kurn

351 Mo. 980 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 27, 1943

Brown also was killed. … , Brown refused to stop and Bradley then tried to get out of the automobile, stating (l.c. 495): "If the presumption could be carried thus far, it would conflict with another equally strong presumption, viz. that when Brown

State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. Petry

397 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1965

Section 352.110, R.S.Mo.1959, V. A.M.S. It did so provide in Article II, Section 8, of the By-Laws. … Junkins v.

Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School District

30 F. Supp. 2d 1175 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 28, 1998

Marcus v. Iowa Pub. Television, 97 F.3d 1137, 1140-41 (8th Cir.1996). "The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury." Elrod v. … Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260, 270-71 , 108 S.Ct. 562 , 98 L.Ed.2d 592 (1988).

Sperry v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local Union No. 782

202 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 1962

by the Board on November 24,1961, and that accordingly, no charge against Spartan under Section 8(a) (2) is presently pending before the Board. 6. … Petitioner is Regional Director of the Seventeenth Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2.

Saleno v. City of Neosho

27 L.R.A. 769 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1895

Beard v. City of Hopkinsville, 24 S. W. Rep. 872 ; Spilman v. Parkersburg, 14 S. E. Rep. 279 ; East St. Louis v. East St. Louis, etc., Co., 98 Ill. 451 ; Springfield v. Edwards, 84 Ill. 626 ; Law v. … Cedar Falls, 27 Iowa, 227 ; Grant v. Davenport, 36 Iowa, 401 ; Budd v. Budd, 59 Fed. Rep. 735; Water Co. v. Walla Walla, 60 Fed. Rep. 957; State v. McCauley, 15 Cal. 429 ; Koppikus v.