Case law

State v. Allen

317 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

State v. Allen, 74 N.C. App. at 453, 328 S.E. 2d at 617. … We begin with State v. Thompson, 297 N.C. 285 , 254 S.E. 2d 526 (1979).

Knott v. . Burwell

96 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Among the cases cited is that of Nelson v. … May v. Brown, 3 B. & C., 113; 10 E. C. L. Rep., 24.

Kestler v. . Verble

52 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1859

The defendant has the older deed from Brown. … Cited: Jones v. Clark, post , 421; Latta v. Electric Co. , 146 N.C. 298 . *Page 146

Wheeler v. Norfolk-Carolina Telegraph & Telephone Co.

172 N.C. 9 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1916

Moore v. Power Co., *11 163 N. C., 300 ; Brown v. Electric Co., 138 N. C., 535 . Referring to these cases and the position they uphold, in Wood v. Land Co., 163 N. C., at p. 371 , the Court said: “That case, Brown v. … And, on the facts of the present case, authority is to the effect, further, that punitive damages maybe awarded (Carmichael v. Telephone Co., 157 N. C., 21 ; Williams v. R. R., 144 N. C., 498 ; Brown v.

McCarley v. . Council

205 N.C. 370 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1933

In Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. … See Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 668 , 169 S. E., 419 . It was approved in Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388 , 163 S. E., 119 , and may now be regarded as settled. In Pridgen and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education v. 34 ED, LLC

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 14, 2020

Brown v. Transurban USA. Inc., 144 F. Supp. 3d 809, 828 (E.D. Va. 2015). … Brown, 144 F. Supp. 3d at 828.

Hodges v. Home Mortgage Co.

201 N.C. 701 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1931

The Pennsylvania Court in Eagleson v. Harry G. … Distinguishing Browne v. Browne Co., 116 N.

Miller v. SZILAGYI

221 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2012

See Flitt v. Flitt, 149 N.C. … Brown v. Ellis, _N.C. App. _, _, 696 S.E.2d 813, 819 (2010), disc. review denied, 365 N.C. 209 , 709 S.E.2d 928 (2011).

Lusk v. Hickory Public Schools

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 8, 2000

The defendant is self-insured with North Carolina School Board Insurance Trust as the Administrator. 4. The plaintiffs average weekly wage is $157.50 per week. 5. … His position required him to operate saws and lift boards of lumber ranging from 15 to 60 pounds.

Flippin v. Jarrell

301 N.C. 108 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

Stanley v. Brown, 43 N.C.App. 503 , 259 S.E.2d 408 (1979), disc. rev. denied, 299 N.C. 332 , 265 S.E.2d 397 (1980). … Stanley v. Brown, supra, 43 N.C.App. 503 , 259 S.E.2d 408 . See, e. g., Spencer v. McDowell Motor Co., 236 N.C. 239 , 72 S.E.2d 598 (1952).

State v. Thomas

296 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1978

The victim’s son testified that on the night of the crime he saw a black man in his mother’s apartment, and that the man was wearing a light brown cap, a light brown coat and black pants. … Luther Hines testified that defendant came to Hines’ residence at midnight that same evening wearing a brown cap, a brown coat and black pants, and that defendant had blood on the front portions of his body.

Wise v. HARRINGTON GROVE COMMUNITY ASS'N

357 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 2003

Wise v. … Brown, 234 N.C. 517, 522 , 67 S.E.2d 489, 492 (1951). As a general rule, "[r]estrictive covenants are valid so long as they do not impair the enjoyment of the estate and are not contrary to the public interest."

McRae v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

74 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SU

326 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1990

See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-78 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 548, 560-61 (1972). … National Labor Relations Board v. Phelps, 136 F.2d 562, 563 (5th Cir. 1943) (footnote omitted), cited in Hummel v. Heckler, 736 F.2d 91, 93 (3d Cir. 1984).

Hunter-Rainey v. N.C. Cent. Univ.

782 S.E.2d 122 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016

United States v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.

338 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 23, 1971

The vacancies on the West Board occasioned by resignation of the two blacks transferred to that board were not filled. … Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836, 866 (5th Cir., 1966), aff’d on rehearing en banc, 380 F.2d 385 (5th Cir., 1966), cert. denied, Caddo Parish School Bd. v.

Thompson v. Union Cty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2022

¶ 18 The Superior Court is not the trier of fact; that is the function of the town board. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co., Inc. v. … See Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Guilford County Bd. of Adjustment, 126 N.C. App. 168, 171, 484 S.E.2d 411, 414 (1997).

State v. Brady

16 N.C. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1972

State v. Shoemaker, 9 N.C. App. 273 , 175 S.E. 2d 781 (1970). … State v. Altman, 15 N.C. App. 257 , 189 S.E. 2d 793 , cert. denied, 281 N.C. 759 , 191 S.E. 2d 362 (1972).

In re Suttles Surveying, P.A.

227 N.C. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2013

Because Appellant does not allege that the Board’s findings were unsupported by competent evidence in the record, the Board’s findings of fact are binding on Appeal. See N. C. State Bar v. McLaurin, 169 N.C. … data recorded on the map. *77 Appellant cites Blaylock Grading Co. v.

Godsey v. Poe

36 N.C. App. 682 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1978

Accordingly, the question of whether the Open Meetings Law, G.S. 143-318.1, et seq. is applicable to local school boards is not before us at this time. In this connection see Student Bar Association v. … Stevenson v.