Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

4.12s

  • State ex rel. Foster v. McKenzie

    683 S.W.2d 270 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1984

    Teefey v. Teefey, 533 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Mo. banc 1976). On imprisonment for civil contempt, the con-temnor in a sense has the key to his cell in his pocket, Brown v. … Huber v. Huber, 649 S.W.2d 955, 958 (Mo.App.1983); Mechanic v. Gruensfelder, 461 S.W.2d 298, 304 (Mo.App.1970).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Reorganized School District No. 4 v. Holmes

    360 Mo. 904 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1950

    Rosenstahl v. Storey, supra.” Art. … This act is not such an exclusive legislative function'as may not be delegated to the State Board of Education, county boards-of edrication and the voters of the proposed district. Wheeler School District v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Long

    360 S.W.2d 307 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1962

    This court has ruled on this point adversely to the board in Scism v. Long et al., Mo.App., 280 S.W.2d 481 , where it was held that a St. … Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. District of Columbia, 72 App.D.C. 155 , 113 F.2d 162, 165 (4); Albertson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Milburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

    331 Mo. 1171 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1932

    In another case, (Brown's Admrs. v. … Co., 99 Kan. 589 , 162 P. 347 , L.R.A. 1917E, 734 ; Smith v. C., M. St. P. Ry. Co. (Minn.), 195 N.W. 534 , certiorari denied, 264 U.S. 582 , 68 L.Ed. 860 , 44 Sup. Ct. 331; Brown v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Ohlmann v. Clarkson Saw Mill Co.

    222 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1909

    Brown, 197 Mo. l. c. 46 et seq.; Morrison v. Turnbaugh, 192 Mo. l. c. 445 et seq.] … Brown and he was sued as Henry T.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co.

    333 Mo. 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 24, 1933

    rails, with the result that the north rail was some two to four inches higher than the level of the board flooring. … [Browning v. Wabash Western Railroad Co., 124 Mo. 55 , 71, 27 S.W. 644 ; Hulsey v. Quarry Const. Co., 326 Mo. 194 , 219, 30 S.W.2d 1018 ; Keyes v. Chicago, B. Q. Ry. Co., 326 Mo. 236 , 31 S.W.2d 50 , 64.]

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. McNeal

    575 S.W.2d 802 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1978

    The report here in question is a “record retained by” the Board of Police Commissioners, a public governmental body under the statute. See Cohen v. Poelker, 520 S.W.2d 50 (Mo. banc 1975). … See Aspin v. Department of Defense, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 231 , 491 F.2d 24 (1973); Frankel v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Terrell G. Johnson

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 2015

    Nevertheless, the facts here are quite different than those in Brown. … Brown, 2014 WL 6464568, at *8.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Peterson

    525 S.W.2d 599 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1975

    The contents of the brown paper sack, the purse, and two cigarette butts and the brown leaf with the stem on it tacked above defendant’s bed were seized by Piburn and removed from the home. … Chimel v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Koehr

    834 S.W.2d 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1992

    Co. v. Gallagher, 811 S.W.2d 353 (Mo. banc 1991). … Miller’s Mutual Insurance Association v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Naturopathic Laboratories International, Inc. v. Dermal Research Laboratories, Inc.

    415 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 2006

    See Mathieu v. Gopher News Co., 273 F.3d 769, 776 (8th Cir.2001); Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co., 72 F.3d 648, 655 (8th Cir.1995). … Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209, 242 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993); see also Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1057 (8th Cir.2000); Morgenstern v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bank of Crestwood v. Gravois Bank

    616 S.W.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1981

    Farmer’s Bank of Antonia v. Kostman, 577 S.W.2d 915, 923 (Mo.App.1979); Bank of Belton v. State Banking Board, 554 S.W.2d 451, 456 (Mo.App.1977); Glasnapp v. … State Banking *513 Board, 545 S.W.2d 382, 387-88 (Mo.App.1976); Central Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board, 509 S.W.2d 175, 181-85 (Mo.App.1974); Blue Ridge Bank v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Milligan v. G. D. Milligan Grocer Co.

    207 Mo. App. 472 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1921

    Then should it afterward become necessary to prove what action was taken by. the board, it could be shown by the oral testimony of members of the board who were present. [Preston v. M. Penn R. R. … It is also true that ratification may be shown without showing any formal action of the board of directors or proving’ it by a record of the proceedings of the board at a regular meeting. [Chouteau v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. Travers

    600 S.W.2d 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1980

    Voss v. … Rutter v. Carothers, 223 Mo. 631 , 122 S.W. 1056 (1909).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Petty v. Boeving

    216 Mo. App. 271 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1924

    The hole was left there by the manufacturers of the machine for the purpose of taking out and putting in what are known as vibrator boards, which are placed directly behind the saws and under the brush pulley, which vibrators … The cases to which we refer are: Edwards v. Morehouse Stave & Mfg. Co., 221 S. W. l. c. 747; Hughes v. Marshall Const. Co., 176 *279 S. W. 534; Wagner v. Gilsonite Const. Co., 220 S. W. l. c. 897; Brown v John M.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Barkwell

    590 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1979

    The acquaintanceship proved financially disastrous for Miss Brown. … In State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hogan v. Fleming

    218 Mo. App. 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1924

    It was proper to show that he thought the street car would stop at least prior to its reaching the docks (Vansickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627, 634 ), whether or not it was proper to show what he thought after that time. … [Duffy v. K. C. Rys. Co., supra; Michaels v. Railroad, supra; Green v. United Rys. Co., supra; Taylor v. Railroad, supra.]

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Oetting

    245 S.W.2d 157 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1952

    Crewdson v. … Fry v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Springfield

    817 S.W.2d 611 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1991

    In Jones v. St. … Comm., 770 S.W.2d 296 (Mo.App.1989); and Brown v. Missouri Highway and Trans. Comm., 805 S.W.2d 274 (Mo.App.1991). 2 However, the plaintiffs’ reliance on these “defective road design” cases is misplaced.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. School District of Kansas City

    362 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1951

    Young v. Brassfield, supra; Hurtgen v. *54 Gasche, (Mo.) 223 S. W. (2), 493; White v. Boyne, 324 Mo. 176 , 23 S. W. (2) 107. Compares State ex rel. De Weese v. Morris, 359 Mo. 194 ; 221 S. W. (2) 206; Salvation Army v. … W. (2) 561; Butler v. Board of Education of Consol. School Dist. No. 1, (Mo.) 16 S. W. (2) 44; Kellams v. Compton, (Mo.) 206 S. W. (2) 498; Aquamsi Land Co. v. Cape Girardeau, 346 Mo. 524 , 142 S. W. (2) 332.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.