Case law

Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

168 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

Brown v. Tel. Co. , 111 N.C. 187 , citing numerous cases and the textbooks; Sherrill v. Tel. Co. , 116 N.C. 655 ; Efird v. Tel. Co. , 132 N.C. 267 . … Co. v. Brown , 234 U.S. 547 . But for the reasons given there was, in other respects, Error. *Page 96

Singleton v. . Cherry

168 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1915

It is a mistake to suppose that the case of Rea v. Rea, 156 N. … Vann v. Edwards, 135 N. C., 662. No error.

State v. Duvall

275 S.E.2d 842 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1981

See State v. Herbin, 298 N.C. 441 , 259 S.E.2d 263 (1979); State v. Chandler, 30 N.C.App. 646 , 228 S.E.2d 69 (1976). We do not find that Judge Brown's comments constituted an impermissible expression of opinion. … We hold that the daytime jury view was within Judge Brown's discretion. See Huff v. Thornton, 287 N.C. 1 , 213 S.E.2d 198 (1975); State v.

Jackson v. Leake

476 F. Supp. 2d 515 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 26, 2006

Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 316 (4th Cir.2006) (citations omitted). Turning first to plaintiff Duke, as noted, he is currently a candidate for a North Carolina appellate court. … Board.”

Leonard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

309 N.C. 91 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 1983

Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 (1933) (“Brown II”). In the absence of any Virginia law one way or the other on this issue, the rule of lex loci delicti commissi does not apply. … Brown v. R. R., 202 N.C. 256, 263-64 , 162 S.E. 613, 617-18 (1932) (“Brown I”). Therefore, Chero-Cola could not be made a party defendant in the action.

Morningstar Marinas/Eaton Ferry, LLC v. Warren County

368 N.C. 360 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2015

MORNINGSTAR MARINAS/EATON FERRY, LLC V. … Board.

McCarley v. . Council

205 N.C. 370 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1933

In Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. … See Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 668 , 169 S. E., 419 . It was approved in Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388 , 163 S. E., 119 , and may now be regarded as settled. In Pridgen and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v.

Floyd v. McGill

156 N.C. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2003

Jacobsen v. McMillan, 124 N.C. App. 128, 135 , 476 S.E.2d 368, 372 (1996). Evidence in the record shows that Dr. Rao, Dr. Estwanik, Dr. Batchelor, and Dr. Brown testified to Mrs. … In Curry v. Baker, 130 N.C.

Barger v. Manpower of Hickory Temp. Svcs.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 22, 1997

Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers , 300 N.C. 164 ,167-68, 265 S.E.2d 389 , 392 (1980). … Ballenger v. Burris Indus. , 66 N.C. App. 556 , 567 , 311 S.E.2d 881 , 888 , rev. denied , 310 N.C. 743 , 315 S.E.2d 700 (1984).

S. Env't Law Ctr. v. N.C. Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 13, 2021

Although the Governor does appoint a majority of the members of the board, the board does not have to obtain approval from the Governor or any other state official  SELC V. … In re B.O.A., 372 N.C. 372, 380 (2019) (quoting Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 (1998)).

Disability Rights NC v. North Carolina Board of Elections

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 2022

Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). … OCA-Greater Houston v.

State v. Wright

184 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2007

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 706 (1966). In State v. … State v. Briggs, 137 N.C. App. 125 , 526 S.E.2d 678 (2000). 4. None of the defendant’s constitutional fights, either Federal or State, were violated when he gave his oral statement to Sheriff Brown in the brig.

Taylor v. Carolina Restaurant Group, Inc.

170 N.C. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2005

Mica Co. v. Board of Education, 246 N.C. 714, 717 , 100 S.E.2d 72, 74 (1957) (citations omitted). The Commission’s findings must support its conclusions of law. Creel v. Town of Dover, 126 N.C. … Id., § 18:1, at 213 (citations omitted); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr., 129 N.C.

Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

258 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1963

Co. v. Virginia Eng. Co., 213 F. 2d 109 , 63 A.L.R. 2d 1114 (4th Cir. 1954); Board of Trade Livery Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co., 200 *637 N.W. 633 (Minn. 1924); Creem v. … Searing v.. Berry, 11 N.W. 708 (Iowa 1882); Brown v. Powers, 65 N.Y.S. 733 (1900).

Pasour v. . Lineberger

90 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 ; Halcombe v. Commissioners, 89 N. C., 346 . 3. … Burke v. Turner, 85 N. C., 500 ; Roulhac v. Brown, supra; Sanderson v. Daily, 83 N. C., 67 ; Mabry v. Henry, Ib., 298; Wilson v. Dineberger, 82 N. C., 412 . 5.

In re: D.C.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

Brown, with whom Donna had been living since 15 August 2018. … See Sherrick v. Sherrick, 209 N.C.

Pate v. . R. R.

122 N.C. 877 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1898

The point was considered in Rhyne v. Lipscombe, ante , 650; S. v. Ray, post , 1097, and Tate v. Commissioners., ante , 661. … Wilson , 121 N.C. 425 , it is an administrative court (somewhat like the board of commissioners).

Byers v. Byers

223 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N. C., 428 , 181 S. E., 338 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 ; Hyder v. Hyder, 215 N. C., 239 , 1 S. E. (2d), 540 . … Medlin v. Medlin, 175 N. C., 529 , 95 S. E., 857 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N. C., 64 , 169 S. E., 818 ; Price v. Edwards, 178 N. C., 493 , 101 S. E., 33 ; 30 Am. Jur., 925 .

Rucker v. . Snider Brothers, Inc.

210 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936

Moses v. Morganton, 192 N. C., *778 102; Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77 ; Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25 ; Trust Co. v. R. R., 209 N. C., 304 ; R. R. v. Dixon, 179 U. S., 131 . … Tbe facts alleged in tbe instant case are distinguishable from those on which the decision in Brown v. R. R., supra, was based.

Andrews ex rel. Andrews v. Haygood

655 S.E.2d 440 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

Brown ("trustee") was named trustee and the agreements were made confidential upon the trial court's order. Katelyn is a North Carolina Medicaid recipient due to the injuries she sustained at birth. … Champion Fibre Co. v. Cozad, 183 N.C. 600 , 607, 112 S.E. 810 , 813 (1922) (quoting Board of Sup'rs of Carroll Co. v. U.S., 18 Wall. 71 , 85 U.S. 71 , 21 L.Ed. 771 (1873)).