Case law

Andrews v. Haygood

648 S.E.2d 204 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 2007

648 S.E.2d 204 (2007) Katelyn ANDREWS, a minor, through her Guardian ad Litem, David Andrews and David Andrews and Andrea Andrews, Individually v. Vanessa P. … Brown, Trustee of Katelyn Andrews Segregated Settlement Account. No. 57P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 27, 2007. Pamela S. Duffy, Molly A. Orndorff, Burlington, for Charlie D. Brown. Susannah P.

Jeffries v. Cty. of Harnett

259 N.C. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 2018

JEFFRIES V. … JEFFRIES V.

In re R.S.H.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2022

State v. … State v. Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 149, 446 S.E.2d 579, 590 (1994). Questions of law are reviewed de novo. See State v. Thomsen, 369 N.C. 22, 24, 789 S.E.2d 639, 641 (2016).

Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.

183 N.C. 450 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1922

Marks v. Cotton Mills, 135 N. C., 290; Nail v. Brown, 150 N. C., 535 ; Mercer v. R. R., 154 N. C., 401 . … As we have said, there was evidence tending to show that the defendant negligently furnished a defective drill, and that the plaintiff, in obedience to instructions attempted to “knock it back through the boards or wood,

R.A v. Iredell-Statesville School District Board of Education

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 24, 2023

Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 426 (4th Cir. 2006). … Defendants Iredell-Statesville School District Board of Education (“Board”), the School Officials and other Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss.

Deadwood, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

356 N.C. 407 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 2002

Ed. 2d 430 (1969); Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 563 , 54 L. Ed. 883 (1910)). … Co. v.

State v. Perkerol

77 N.C. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1985

In the second case, Reid v. … See State v. Grimmett; cf. State v.

Inland Am. Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston

2010 NCBC 19 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 24, 2010

Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston, 2010 NCBC 19. … (Dep. of John Brown (“Brown Dep.”) 618:14−621:11.)

State v. . Turner

106 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Brown” was charged in the indictment to be the lessor, or landlord. … State v. Norman, 2 Dev., 222 ; State v. Tomlinson, 77 N. C., 528 ; State v. Heaton, 81 N. C., 542 ; Arch. Cr. Pl., 48; 1 Bish. Cr. Pros., § 375, et seq.

Wise v. Harrington Grove Community Ass'n

357 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 2003

On 7 July 1999, defendant’s board met to consider the fine and heard presentations from plaintiffs and the ACC. … Brown, 234 N.C. 517, 522 , 67 S.E.2d 489, 492 (1951). As a general rule, “[Restrictive covenants are valid so long as they do not impair the enjoyment of the estate and are not contrary to the public interest.”

Newsome v. Surratt

237 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1953

Brown v. Truck Lines, supra; Wood v. Miller, supra; Motor Lines v. Johnson, supra; Eckard v. Johnson, supra. … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra; Roth v.

N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State

812 S.E.2d 846 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2017

Venable v. . Smith

98 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

In Leverson v. Elson, 88 N. … So it is said in Hanna v. Hanna, 89 N.

Hicks v. Seaboard Air Line Railway

158 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1912

Tbe plaintiff does not allege tbat said defendant bas entered upon bis land, or bas committed any act causing bim injury, nor is any relationship shown which would make tbe defendant liable for tbe acts of tbe board of trustees … It would seem tbat tbe board of trustees bad tbe right to enter upon tbe lands of tbe plaintiff for tbe purpose of locating, relocating, or changing a public road, and tbe act of tbe General Assembly (chapter 245, Laws 1909

Peltier v. Charter Day Sch., Inc.

384 F. Supp. 3d 579 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 28, 2019

The uniform policy is set by the Board, and RBA's officers are not members of the Board of CDS, Inc. … Plaintiffs do not bring a Title IX claim against the board members. School officials and individuals are not proper Title IX defendants. Fitzgerald v. Barnstable Sch.

Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.

235 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 ; Roth v. McCord, 232 N.C. 678 , 62 S.E. 2d 64 ; Greyvan Lines v. Harrison, 156 F. 2d 412 , affd. 331 U.S. 704 , 91 L. Ed. 1757 . … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra; Roth v. McCord, supra.

Farr v. Tallassee Power Co.

198 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1930

This was short stuff, and it would take longer boards to get out in safety.” … Speaking to this question, Brown, J., in Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N.

Davis v. SGT. PEPPERS RESTAURANT AND BAR, INC.

658 S.E.2d 483 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 2008

DAVIS, II, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased); and Bobby Buff, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased) v. SGT. … Brown; Gregory A. Brown; and Terry C. Brown. No. 535P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 24, 2008. Forrest A. Ferrell, Jeffry T. Mackie, Hickory, Jason White, for Davis and Buff. Mel J. Garofalo, Lucian P.

FOX v. CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025

See Henderson v. … V.

Conran v. New Bern Police Department

122 N.C. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1996

Bryant v. Adams, 116 N.C. App. 448, 457 , 448 S.E.2d 832, 836-37 (1994). N.C.G.S. § 126-5 states in particular terms which employees are covered by Chapter 126. … Walter v. Vance County, 90 N.C. App. 636, 641 , 369 S.E.2d 631, 634 (1988). The decision of the trial court is affirmed. Chief Judge ARNOLD and Judge MARTIN, Mark D. concur.