Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

0.93s

  • Best v. Schoemehl

    652 S.W.2d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1983

    Louis Board of Police Commissioners” in that name alone does not lie. American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners, 285 Mo. 581 , 227 S.W. 114 (Mo.1920). … Louis Board of Police Commissioners before the Court. While sovereign immunity attaches to the operation and maintenance of a police force, Carmelo v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Haseltine v. Central National Bank

    155 Mo. 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1900

    Justice Harlan delivered the opinion in the McBroom case and also in the Brown case, and in the Brown case he cites and reaffirms the McBroom case. … This is all that the Brown ease decides.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. McPherson

    35 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1864

    (All Saints Church v. Davis, 1 Hall, N. Y., 191; John et al. v. Farm. & Mech. Bk. of Ind., 2 Blackf. 867 ; Chester Glass Co. v. Dewey, 16 Mass. 94 .) 2. As to the invalidity of the calls. … (Trust. of Vernon Soc. v. Hills, 6 Cow. 23 ; All Saints Ch. v. Lovett, 1 Hall, N. Y., 198-9 ; John et al. v. Farm. & Mech. Bk. of Ind., 2 Blackf. 367 ; Ang. & Ames on Corp., 3d ed., 104-5.)

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Cannady

    670 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984

    State v. Cannady, 655 S.W.2d 826 (Mo.App.1983). … Compare, Wingate v. Wainwright, 464 F.2d 209, 212-214 (5th Cir.1972) (barring the use of evidentiary facts); U.S. v. Mespoulede, 597 F.2d 329, 334-336 (2nd Cir.1979) (same); U.S. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • G&G Mech. Constructors, Inc. v. Jeff City Indus., Inc.

    549 S.W.3d 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2018

    Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 410 S.W.3d 623 , 640 (Mo. banc 2013) (citations omitted). … Brown v. Donham , 900 S.W.2d 630 , 632 (Mo. banc 1995).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. Webb City School District No. 92

    373 S.W.2d 193 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1963

    The courts have “inflexibly enforced” the rule of such statute prohibiting dismissal by the board. It has no implied authority to dismiss for any reason. Lemasters v. Willman, Mo.App., 281 S.W.2d 580 ; Magenheim v. … Lemasters v. Willman, supra, Mo.App., 281 S.W.2d 580, 590 ; see Magenheim v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. of Riverview Gardens, supra, Mo.App., 347 S.W.2d 409 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • J. A. Ruhl Clothing Co. v. Singleton

    161 Mo. App. 366 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1912

    [Faust v. Koers, 111 Mo. App. 560 ; 86 S. W. 278 ; Tufts v. Morris, 87 Mo. App. 98 ; Glass Co. v. Friedlander, 84 Wis. 53 , 54 N. W. 28 ; Estey Organ Co. v. Lehman, 111 N. W. 1097 ; 11 L. R. A. (N. … W. 1051 ; Foster v. Rowley, 67 N. W. 1077 ; Brown v. Foster, 108 N. Y. 387 .] In Faust v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Andrews

    329 S.W.3d 369 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 25, 2011

    Andrews then pulled the revolver out of his pocket and waited for Brown to arrive. When Brown stopped his car in the alley and got out, Andrews shot him once in the upper back. … Officer Brown died later that night due to his injury.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Russell v. City of Raytown

    544 S.W.2d 48 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976

    That power allows the Board to pass ordinances to regulate the manner of impeachments and removals. The definition of manner was taken from Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2d Ed. in State ex rel. Stamm v. … Bishop v. Wood, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

    311 S.W.2d 41 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1958

    Akins entered into negotiation with one Brown, the salesman in charge (Brown also happened to be Akins’s son-in-law), and the upshot was that Akins agreed to trade in his 1942 Ford, at an allowance of $100, to pay $127 in … Brown says no papers were delivered except possibly an invoice.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Hutchens v. St. Louis County

    848 S.W.2d 616 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1993

    Board of Adjustment of the Village of Bel-Ridge, 804 S.W.2d 821, 822 (Mo.App.1991) (quoting Cunningham v. Board of Aldermen of the City of Overland, 691 S.W.2d 464, 466 (Mo.App.1985)). … Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Assn. v. Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis, 425 S.W.2d 929, 933 (Mo. banc 1968); Volkman v. City of Kirkwood, 624 S.W.2d 58, 61 (Mo.App.1981).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Bank of Crestwood v. Gravois Bank

    616 S.W.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1981

    Farmer’s Bank of Antonia v. Kostman, 577 S.W.2d 915, 923 (Mo.App.1979); Bank of Belton v. State Banking Board, 554 S.W.2d 451, 456 (Mo.App.1977); Glasnapp v. … State Banking *513 Board, 545 S.W.2d 382, 387-88 (Mo.App.1976); Central Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board, 509 S.W.2d 175, 181-85 (Mo.App.1974); Blue Ridge Bank v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In Re Ancillary Adversary Proceeding Questions

    89 S.W.3d 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 2002

    These funds are the same as those at issue in Farmer v. Kinder, et al., 89 S.W.3d 447 (Mo. banc 2002) and State ex inf. Nixon v. Kinder and Brown, 89 S.W.3d 454 (Mo. banc 2002), also decided this date. … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Puchta

    786 S.W.2d 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1990

    State v. Dale, 775 S.W.2d 126, 133 (Mo. banc 1989); State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 698 (Mo. banc 1983). … Brown’s plea was both hearsay and violated defendant’s right of confrontation. It was held in State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Heidebur v. Parker

    505 S.W.2d 440 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1974

    was arbitrary or discriminatory”; and in two cases from Pennsylvania, Smith v. … We are referred also to Rhinehart v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Gibson

    856 S.W.2d 78 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1993

    He also pointed out that Brown’s brother-in-law was a police officer. … State v. Twenter, 818 S.W.2d 628, 634 [5] (Mo. banc 1991).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Belt v. City of St. Louis

    161 Mo. 371 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1901

    Skrainka, 105 Mo. 303 ; Verdin v. St. Louis, 131 Mo. 26 .] In City of St. Louis v. … [Schopp v. St. Louis, 117 Mo. 136 -7; Sherlock v. Kansas City Belt Line, 142 Mo. 172 ; Knapp, Stout & Co. v. Railroad, 126 Mo. 26 ; Schulenburg v. Railroad, 129 Mo. 455 .] And it was held in Glaessner v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State v. Blank

    705 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1985

    State v. Rhodes, 591 S.W.2d 174, 177 [6] (Mo.App. 1979). The essential issue is governed by State v. Stark, 590 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1979). … City of Independence v. Peterson, 437 S.W.2d 168, 170 [7] (Mo.App.1968).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Townes

    941 S.W.2d 756 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1997

    In State v. … For example, in Vazquez v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Veal v. City of St. Louis

    365 Mo. 836 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1956

    V, § 3, V.A.M.S.; Fleming v. Moore Bros. Realty Co., 363 Mo. 305 , 251 S.W.2d 8 . … Louis Court of Appeals, the Circuit Court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Adjustment was affirmed. Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo. App., 249 S.W.2d 491 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.