Case law

Brown v. Western Electric Co.

646 S.W.2d 912 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1983

Vaughn & Brown v. Hatfield

13 Tenn. 236 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1833

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Kingsport Utilities, Inc. v. Brown

201 Tenn. 393 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1955

The case of Arkansas Power Light Co. v. … Judge Felts has covered the question .of foreseeability in Ms opinion in Spivey v. St. Thomas Hospital, 31 Tenn.App. 12 , 211 S.W.2d 450 .

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown & McCarver v. Pippin

59 Tenn. 657 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Henniken & Palmore v. Brown

63 Tenn. 397 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Cheney, McAlister, and Sample, the latter having been called in during the trial, in the account of Henniken & Palmore against Goodwin & Brown, wherein the said Henniken & Palmore are to deduct from their account of $1,682

Sullivan's Lessee v. Brown

1 Tenn. 6 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1799

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

Gaston v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

120 S.W.3d 815 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2003

Bill Brown Constr. Co. v. Glens Falls Ins. Co., 818 S.W.2d 1, 13 (Tenn.1991) (emphasis in original); see also Rutherford v. Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co., 608 S.W.2d 843, 846 (Tenn.1980). … The burden of proof to establish waiver rests with the insured, Bill Brown Constr. Co., 818 S.W.2d at 13 , and is a question of fact for the jury, see Carolyn B. Beasley Cotton Co. v.

Brown v. Foote

2 Tenn. Ch. R. 255 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 1875

This ruling was followed by Sir Thomas Plumer, in Barton v. Briscoe, 1 Jac. 603, and by the Lord Chancellor in Woodmeston v. Walker, 2 Russ. & M. 197, and Brown v. Pocock, id. 210. The case of Tullett v. … Irwin v. Farrer, 19 Ves. 86; David v. Bridgman, 2 Yerg. 557 ; Johnson v. Johnson, Tenn. Sup. Ct., January term, 1876; Heathy v. Thomas, 15 Ves. 576 ; London Chartered Bank v. Lempriere, Law Rep. 4 P. C. 572.

McGavock v. Brown & Williams

23 Tenn. 251 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

Dorris, who stated that he was called upon by Brown & Williams to assist in settling their partnership accounts, and that while engaged in making this settlement a conversation arose between them as to the debt Brown owed … He says, that in a conversation between Brown and Williams in his presence, Williams said “that Brown’s old debt would have to be deducted from the amount due them from McGavock for the work,” and that Brown knew that it

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

Miller v. Brown & Forsyth

79 Tenn. 155 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

subject to the satisfaction of the debt by execution, for the obvious reason that the court would do at once what might be done circuitously by a sale of the land by virtue of the execution as soon as it was redeemed: Cooley v. … It has been so held in the analogous case of a vendor’s, lien: Bentley v. Jordan, 3 Lea, 353 , 358. The homestead is not exempt' from the debt. Affirm the decree with costs, and remand.'

Brown & Herndon v. Williams

23 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1843

Tadd Timothy Brown v. Dawn Veronica Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 26, 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2016 TADD TIMOTHY BROWN v. … Dawn Veronica Brown (“Mother”) filed a petition for contempt against her ex-husband Tadd Timothy Brown (“Father”) in the Chancery Court for Williamson County (“the Trial Court”).

State v. Brown

737 S.W.2d 301 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 10, 1987

The defendant, Melvin Brown, was convicted by jury in two cases, tried separately, of passing worthless checks over $100. … State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 835 (Tenn.1978).

Brown v. Crump's adm'r

32 Tenn. 531 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1852