Case law

Luther v. Brown

66 Mo. App. 227 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1896

Nor has the plaintiff shown a right of recovery under the covenant for *231 further assurance, since under the limitations imposed upon the meaning of that covenant in Armstrong v.

State v. Brown

669 S.W.2d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984

Hamre v. Conger, 357 Mo. 497, 506 , 209 S.W.2d 242, 248 (Mo.1948); Cole v. Uhlmann Grain Co., 340 Mo. 277, 297 , 100 S.W.2d 311, 322 (1936); Lewis v. State, 623 S.W.2d 562, 563 (Mo.App.1981). … State v. Olinghouse, 605 S.W.2d 58, 69-70 [14][15] (Mo. banc 1980); State v.

State v. Brown

588 S.W.2d 745 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1979

State v. Selle, 367 S.W.2d 522, 526 (Mo.1963); State v. Randolph, 139 Mo.App. 314 , 123 S.W. 61, 62 (1909). … Furthermore, as recognized in State v.

State v. Brown

984 S.W.2d 535 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1998

State v. Schuler, 838 S.W.2d 19, 20 (Mo.App. E.D.1992); State v. Couch, 793 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Mo.App. E.D.1990). … In State v.

Burghart v. Brown

51 Mo. 600 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1873

William McCay was sworn and examined, who stated as follows : “ I was talking one day in Utica with plaintiff about defendant and his ability to pay a note that plaintiff said he had on him, (the one in controversy,) when Brown … would pay the other half.” *601 The plaintiff asked the witness to state “what answer (Brown) the defendant made to this proposition, if any, of plaintiff) to pursue the seller of the note.”

State v. Brown

281 S.W.3d 850 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2009

Luke Brown (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 *851 RSMo (2000) and one count of armed criminal action,

State v. Brown

916 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1996

State v. Walton, 796 S.W.2d 374, 378 (Mo. banc 1990); State v. Becton, 841 S.W.2d 315, 319 (Mo.App.E.D.1992). … Brown sought to inject the possibility another man may have committed the robbery. The trial court has broad discretion in admitting or excluding evidence. State v. Clark, 859 S.W.2d 782, 787 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).

Clay v. Brown

148 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 1910

[Learned v. Tillotson, 97 N. Y. 1 ; 1 Ency. of Ev. 359, 361; and see cases cited in St. Louis Gunning Adv. Co. v. Wanamaker & Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 .] … [Schlicker v. Gordon, 19 Mo. App. 479 .] It is insisted James M.

State v. Brown

690 S.W.2d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1985

I do, however, recall the following: she made numerous references in her closing argument about Brown being a ‘professional criminal’; she indicated, that while Brown did not take the stand, that he had prior felony convictions … State v. Mobley, 369 S.W.2d 576, 580 (Mo.1963); State v. Stockbridge, 549 S.W.2d 648, 651 (Mo.App.1977). We reverse and remand for a new trial. KELLY, J., concurs. CLEMENS, Senior Judge, dissents in separate opinion.

Charlton v. Brown

49 Mo. 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1872

Counsel have cited some New York cases, among which are Hill v. Crockford, 24 N. Y. 128 , and Morris v.

Thompson v. Brown

121 Mo. App. 524 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1906

[Bank v. Hunt, 25 Mo. App. 170 ; Ford v. O’Donnell, 40 Mo. App. 51 .] Those cases are supported by Angell v. Hester, 64 Mo. 142 ; Ring v. Jamison, 66 Mo. 424, 429 ; Meier v. Thieman, 90 Mo. 433 , and Scott v. … If they prevail in this action, it will be upon the theory that he and Brown were comakers and a judgment against Brown’s estate would not bar a judgment against Tyler.

Brown v. State

262 S.W.3d 679 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2008

Donald Brown (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion. … For Counts I, III, V, second-degree robbery, attempted robbery and first-degree burglary, respectively. 3 .For Counts II, IV, VI, armed criminal action.

State v. Brown

966 S.W.2d 332 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1998

State v. Weaver, 912 S.W.2d 499, 509 (Mo. banc 1995)(citing State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 15 (Mo. banc.1992)). … State v. Wade, 926 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Mo.App.1996)(citing State v. Daugherty, 906 S.W.2d 812, 818 (Mo.App.1995)).

Brown v. McKown

265 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1915

Brown, the plaintiff, the present wife of Clinton Brown, formerly the wife of Joel 0. … Jones, 143 Mo. 253 , l. c. 278, and Davidson v. Dockery, 179 Mo. 687 , l. c. 694.

Marshall v. Brown

205 Mo. App. 390 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1920

As before stated, Rowe got well, quit working for Brown and left. … The two cases cited, Ayers v. Railroad, 190 Mo. 228 , l. c. 235, 88 S. W. 608 , and Harris v. Railroad, 115 Mo. App. l. c. 532, 91 S. W. 1010 , do not deal with the question here on cross-examination.

State v. Brown

989 S.W.2d 652 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1999

State v. Wolf, 930 S.W.2d 484, 485 (Mo.App.1996). In State v. … See State v. Kurtz, 78 Ariz. 215 , 278 P.2d 406 (1954); State v. Robinson, 379 So.2d 712 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980); Tapp v. State, 406 N.E.2d 296 (Ind.Ct.App.1980); State v.

Badovinatz v. Brown

192 S.W.3d 445 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2006

This is a premises liability case brought against property owners Lonnie and Rise Brown (“Defendants”). … For the reasons given in Hammarstrom v.

Makara v. Brown

924 S.W.2d 312 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1996

State of Illinois v. Schaumann, 918 S.W.2d 393, 395 (Mo.App.1996). … Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283 , 285 n. 2 (Mo.App.1994); Inman v. Reorganized Sch. Dist. of Hayti, 814 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Mo.App.1991).

Brown v. Smith

800 S.W.2d 137 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1990

The evidence adduced below reveals that the appellant and George Brown were married on January 16, 1958. On October 4, 1981, William Brown, the father of George Brown, passed away. … Reinheimer v. Rhedans, 327 S.W.2d 823, 828-29 (Mo.1959). The court, thus, erred in placing the burden of proof on the appellant. Respondent directs this court to Weber v.

Brown v. Vossen

112 Mo. App. 676 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 22, 1905

We have been cited to a case which was considered in this court (Hope v. Barker, 43 Mo. App. 632 ) and transferred to the Supreme Court where it was again considered ( 112 Mo. 338 ). … [Chouteau v. Allen, 70 Mo. 339 ; Altman v. Rittenshoffer, 68 Mich. 287 ; 1 Daniels, Neg. Inst., sec. 45a.]