Case law

Sutton v. . Wood

1 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1801

Cited: Brown v. Brown , 25 N.C. 136 ; Buchanan v. Buchanan , 99 N.C. 311 . NOTE. — On the first point, see Bryant v. Deberry , 3 N.C. 356 , and the cases and Acts of Assembly referred to in the note. See, also, Brown v. … Brown , 25 N.C. 134 . On the second point, see Mably v. Stainback, ante , 33, and the cases referred to in the note. (406)

Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.

256 N.C. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2017

. v. … error under Cannon v.

State v. . R. R.

119 N.C. 814 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

S. v. Brown , 109 N.C. 802 ; S. v. McBrayer , 98 N.C. 619 . The evidence is not sufficient in any aspect of it to excuse the running of the train after 9 o'clock. … Cited: S. v. Rogers, ante , 796; S. v. R. R. , 145 N.C. 550 , 573 , 575 ; S. v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 476 ; Davis v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 600 . (822)

Day v. Walker

206 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 12, 1962

Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, 263 F.2d 502 , 4th Cir. 1959. … Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade v. Federal Trade Commission, 294 F.2d 619 , 4th Cir. 1961.

James v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

141 N.C. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 2001

Amber Brown (Brown), an employee of Defendant, witnessed Plaintiffs fall. She was positioned just inside the entrance to the store working as a greeter. … Lorinovich v. K Mart Corp., 134 N.C. App. 158, 161-62 , 516 S.E.2d 643, 646 , cert. denied, 351 N.C. 107 , - S.E.2d - (1999).

Brooks v. Ward

97 F.R.D. 529 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 8, 1983

Atkins v. State Board of Education of North Carolina, 418 F.2d 874, 876 (4th Cir.1969); Miller & Miller Auction, Inc. v. G.W. Murphy Industries, Inc., 472 F.2d 893 , 895-6 (10th Cir.1973); Fuller v. … Battle v. Anderson, 376 F.Supp. 402 (E.D.Okl.1974), aff’d. 564 F.2d 388 (10th Cir.1977); James v. Wallace, 406 F.Supp. 318 (M.D.Ala.1976), aff’d. in substance sub nom, Newman v.

Window World of Baton Rouge, LLC v. Window World, Inc.; Window World of St. Louis, Inc. v. Window World, Inc.

2019 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 16, 2019

Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 536, 645 S.E.2d 117, 122–23 (2007); see Technetics Grp. … WW primarily relies upon the Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 645 S.E.2d 117 (2007), to support its position.

Zimmerman v. Appalachian State University

149 N.C. App. 121 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

Dept. of Correction v. McNeely, 135 N.C. App. 587, 592 , 521 S.E.2d 730, 733 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. … Carpenter v. Brooks, 139 N.C.

State v. Mitchell

77 N.C. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1985

In State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E. 2d 856 (1984), involving a similar variance in a kidnapping indictment and the jury instruction, our Supreme Court held that a new trial was required. … As in this case, the defendant in Brown did not object at trial to the instruction on terrorizing, but the Court held that the “plain error” rule adopted in State v.

George v. McClure

245 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 2003

I, L.P. v. Andrews Co., Inc., 128 N.C.App. 716, 720 , 496 S.E.2d 607, 610 (1998) (Caswell II); see also Kenny v. … I, L.P. v.

Garlock v. WAKE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

712 S.E.2d 158 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2011

Number two, Your Honor, we're asking for clear guidelines going forward, including for May 18th, which I would just note, is the day after the 56th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Brown versus *166 Board of … App.1971); see also Edwards v. City Council of City of Seattle, 3 Wash.App. 665 , 479 P.2d 120 (1970). Id. The Arizona Supreme Court, in Karol v. Board of Educ.

In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of Durham

243 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1956

This Court, in Brown v. … Commissioners, 173 N.C. 598 , 92 S.E. 502 , held that, “An Act to authorize the board of commissioners of Me- *500 Dowell Comity to issue bonds for road purposes in North Cove Township in said county,” was a valid law and

Lee v. H. L. Green & Co.

236 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 1952

Ross v. Drug Store, 225 N.C. 226 , 34 S.E. 2d 64 ; Watkins v. Furnishing Co., 224 N.C. 674 , 31 S.E. 2d 917 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N.C. 368 , 8 S.E. 2d 199 ; Parker v. … There seemed to be on part of the boards little streaks that didn’t seem to be perfectly dry. I could detect the exact point where I stepped and at that point there was a greater accumulation of oil. . . .

Islet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC

2017 NCBC 17 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 6, 2017

Brown v. Refuel Am., Inc., 186 N.C. App. 631, 634, 652 S.E.2d 389, 392 (2007).  25. … Brown, 186 N.C. App. at 638, 652 S.E.2d at 394 (quoting Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 790 (1984)). 27.

Reed v. Elmore

246 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1957

Walsh, 217 N.C. 32, 38 , 6 S.E. 2d 817 ; Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4, 10 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Krites v. Plott, 222 N.C. 679, 681 , 24 S.E. 2d 531 .” Seawell, J., in McKay v. Cameron, 231 N.C. 658 , 58 S.E. 2d 638 . … Denny, 156 N.Y.S. 1016 , and Feinberg v. Board of Education, 276 S.W. 823 (Ky.); Hutchinson v. Ulrich, 21 L.R. A. 391 (Ill.). The easements imposed are coterminous with the estate granted and retained. Ruffin v. R.

Downes v. United States

249 F. Supp. 626 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 28, 1965

This policy is clearly expressed in United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141,143 , supra. … United States, 337 U.S. 49 , 69 S.Ct. 918 , supra, and so concisely enunciated in United States, v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , supra. The case of Adams v. United States, Civil Action No. 1032 (M.D.Ga.

R.A v. Iredell-Statesville School District Board of Education

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 2023

authority,” Magana v. … See, e.g., Craig v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 646 S.E.2d 923, 925 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007), rev'd on other grounds, 678 S.E.2d 351; see also Barrett v. Board of Educ. of Johnston County, 13 F.

Douglass v. Dawson

190 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1925

Hardware Co. v. Holt, 173 N. C., 308 ; Observer Co. v. Little, 175 N. C., 42 . … S., 1210; Besselliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65, 2 A. L. R., 862; Bender v. Speight, 159 N. C., 612 ; Black v. Power Co., 158 N. C., 468 ; Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N. C., 456 ; Smathers v. Bank, 135 N. C., 410 ; Coble v.

The Times News Publ'g Co. v. The Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

242 N.C. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

V. … V.

Roberts v. . Roberts

185 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 1923

See citation of authorities in note to Brown v. Brown; Ann. Cas., 1915 D, 73; in note to Thompson v. Thompson, 14 Ann. Cas., 881, and in Crowell v. Crowell, supra, concurring opinion. … Fiedeer v. Fiedeer, 140 Pac. (Okla.), 1023; Brown v. Brown, 89 At. (Conn.), 889; Fitzpatrick v. Owens, Ann. Cas., 1918 C (Ark.), 773; Prosser v. Prosser, 102 S. E. (S. C.), 787; Thompson v. Thompson, 218 U.