Case law

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Cameron

342 Mo. 830 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1938

Preisler v. Woodward et al., 340 Mo. 906 , 105 S. W. (2d) 912 , was a mandamus proceeding to compel the election board of the city of St. … Gen. v. Vail, 53 Mo. 97 ; Sheridan v. St. Louis, 183 Mo. 25 , 81 S. W. 1082 , and cases cited therein.]

Black v. McGonigle

103 Mo. 192 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Charles, 47 Mo. 465 ; Railroad v. Maguire, 49 Mo. 483 ; Cooley on Taxation [1 Ed.] 291. … Book v. Earl, 87 Mo. 246 ; Arnold v. Hawkins, 95 Mo. 569 .

Buss v. Allison Window Glass Co.

146 Mo. App. 71 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1909

[Compton v. Parsons, 76 Mo. 455 ; Murphy v. Gay, 37 Mo. 535 ; Keystone Implement Co. v. Leonard, 40 Mo. App. 477 ; Kerr v. Haymaker, 20 Mo. App. 350 ; Barr v. Baker, 9 Mo. 840 .] … [Brown v. Weldon, 99 Mo. 564 ; Keystone Implement Co. v. Leonard, 40 Mo. App. 477 .] It is the principle last referred to which plaintiff sought to invoke in the third instruction which was refused by the court.

Whitehead v. Tapp

69 Mo. 415 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

The recent case of Brown v. Brown’s Admr., 68 Mo. 388 , is directly in point.

Modern Horse Shoe Club v. Stewart

242 Mo. 421 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1912

To the same general effect are Beck v. Flournoy Live-Stock Co., 65 Fed. 30 ; Pon v. Wittman, 147 Cal. 280 ; Pittsburg Ry. Co. v. Town of Crothersville, 159 Ind. 330 . … Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur.

Veal v. City of St. Louis

365 Mo. 836 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1956

V, § 3, V.A.M.S.; Fleming v. Moore Bros. Realty Co., 363 Mo. 305 , 251 S.W.2d 8 . … Louis Court of Appeals, the Circuit Court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Adjustment was affirmed. Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo. App., 249 S.W.2d 491 .

Scism v. Long

280 S.W.2d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1955

The Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis is created by an Act of the General Assembly, Chapter 84 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., hence is a body created by law. State ex rel. Murphy v. … McKittrick v. Wilson, 350 Mo. 486 , 166 S.W.2d 499 , 143 A.L.R. 1465 .

State v. Harris

477 S.W.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1972

State v. Lowe, supra. … State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409 , 22 S.W. 367 . The court gave an instruction which adequately covered the issue and was not required to accept that offered by the defendant. State v.

State v. Conrick

375 S.W.3d 894 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2012

In State v. Allen, 274 S.W.3d 514 (Mo. App. … He also admitted that the three photographs in the right column of the line up showed men with brown hair, though the top two men had dark brown hair, and the bottom man had medium brown hair. *904 Neill admitted that when

State v. Williams

18 S.W.3d 461 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2000

COURT: If you have another witness you want to call besides— WILLIAMS: Patrick Brown. COURT: If you wish to testify, you may get up and testify. WILLIAMS: Where’s the witness, Patrick Brown? … See State v. Ivy, 851 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo.App. E.D.1993); State v. Anthony, 857 S.W.2d 861, 868-69 (Mo.App.W.D.1993).

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Blunt

135 S.W.3d 416 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 2004

Co. v. Kansas City, 504 S.W.2d 127, 130 (Mo.1974). … Upchurch v. Blunt, 810 S.W.2d 515 (Mo. banc 1991); Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 167 (1956). Nor has the Secretary of State expressly indicated that he would do so.

Moore v. Missouri Friends of the Wabash Trace Nature Trail, Inc.

991 S.W.2d 681 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1999

Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649, 653 (Mo.1941). … Brown, 152 S.W.2d at 652 . See also State ex rel. State Highway Commission v.

Kissane v. Brewer

208 Mo. App. 244 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1921

Co. v. McClelland, 9 Colo. 11, 21 ; United Securities Co. v. Ostenbery, 60 Colo. 249 ; State ex rel. v. Bankers Trust Co., 157 Mo. App. 557, 568 ; Coleman v. Tepel, 230 Fed. 63, 67 ; Central Trans. Co. v. … J. 236; Hemmick v. Standard Oil Co., 91 Fed. 332 ; Harrison v.

State Ex Rel. Dalton Ex Rel. Stonum v. Reorganized District No. II

307 S.W.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1957

Norwood v. Norwood, 353 Mo. 548 , 183 S.W.2d 118, 122 . Respondents cite Hixson v. … While the recital may have been admissible as a statement against the interest of the Ray County Board (Simmons v.

Morrell v. Harris

418 S.W.2d 20 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1967

Ruedlinger v. Long, Mo.App., 283 S.W.2d 889 . … Antoine v. Fletcher, Mo.App., 307 S.W.2d 898, 904, 907 . See also Antoine v. McCaffery, Mo.App., 335 S.W.2d 474 , in which a board member was removed under this provision, and State ex rel. Brokaw v.

State v. Lee

303 Mo. 246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1924

[State v. Pruett, 61 Mo. App. l.c. 158-159, a case later approved by this court; State v. Webster, 206 Mo. l.c. 570; State v. Bonner, 178 Mo. 431 ; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. l.c. 227 et seq.] … [State v. Brown, supra.] In State v.

Contour Chair Lounge Co. v. Aljean Furniture Manufacturing Co.

403 S.W.2d 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1966

Royster v. Baker, Mo., 365 S.W.2d 496 ; Rosen v. Alside, Inc., Mo., 248 S.W.2d 638 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 . … Royster v. Baker, supra; Kansas City v. Rathford, 353 Mo. 1130 , 186 S.W.2d 570 ; Medich v. Stippec, 335 Mo. 796 , 73 S.W.2d 998 .

AP GREEN INDUSTRIES v. East Rock Partners

726 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 12, 1989

USG Corp. v. Wagner & Brown, 689 F.Supp. 1483, 1487 (N.D.Ill.1988); Scientific Computers, Inc. v. Edudata Corp., 599 F.Supp. 1092, 1101 (D.Minn.1984). … Flamm v. Eberstadt, 814 F.2d 1169, 1174 (7th Cir.1987) (listing cases).

Goins v. Melton

343 Mo. 413 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1938

It is alleged in the motion that the opinion is in conflict with Section 3112, Revised Statutes 1929, and in conflict with the holding in Sims v. Brown (Div. 2), 252 Mo. 58 , 158 S.W. 624 . … Able counsel for appellant say in their suggestions in support of the motion that "from beginning to end of this appeal" Sims v. Brown has been relied upon. It is true that in Sims v.

State Ex Rel. Mulvoy v. Miller

315 Mo. 41 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1926

[Hill v. St. Louis, 159 Mo. 159 , l. c. 168.] … [Wagner v. St. Louis, 284 Mo. 410 , l. e. 417.] YI.