Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • State v. Fearing

    304 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

    See State v. Charles Fearing, 304 N.C. 471 , 284 S.E. 2d 487 (1981); State v. Duvall, 304 N.C. 557 , 284 S.E. 2d 495 (1981). The instant case, State v. … Judge Brown granted the State’s motion on 4 December (despite Judge Browning’s prior ruling to the contrary on an identical motion).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Dean

    35 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1851

    This very point is decided, S. v. George , 29 N.C. 321 , and the decision is so well sustained by authority and upon principle as not to call for another word. PER CURIAM. Error. Cited: S. v. … Jackson , 82 N.C. 568 ; S. v. Turner , 119 N.C. 848 . *Page 62 (72)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Paper Co. v. Hufham

    81 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

    Etheridge v. Wescott, 244 N.C. 637 , 94 S.E. 2d 846 ; Williams v. Board of Education, 266 N.C. 761 , 147 S.E. 2d *609 381. … McCotter v. Barnes, 247 N.C. 480, 484 , 101 S.E. 2d 330, 333 (1958). The construction of a deed is a question of law for the court. Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 (1950).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State

    371 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2018

    V. … V.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Assessment Against Property of Southern Railway Co.

    196 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

    The fact that the resolution of the board was to the effect that the street be 45 feet from the railroad center and the street is almost wholly within the right of way, and the part assessed is entirely within the right of … Boddie v. Bond, 154 N. C., 359 , 70 S. E., 824 ; 10 R. C. L., 688, et seq. Its compulsion is one of fair play.” Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., at p. 519-20. Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Netcliff

    116 N.C. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1994

    United States v. … Based on Lovasco , our Court in State v. Davis, 46 N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Humphries v. N.C.D.O.C.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 28, 1995

    G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C. App. 579 , 309 S.E.2d 701 (1983). 3. Mr. Tyrone Humphries was not contributorily negligent for the injuries which he sustained on or about 8 April 1990. … G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Wilson

    261 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964

    The contention that the order denying -alimony is supported by Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N.C. 742 , 138 S.E. 12 , s. c. 194 N.C. 673 , 140 S.E. 440 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Turner v. … Manifestly the Court 'did not intend to overrule it without referring thereto., but instead relied on Brown v. Brown, supra, and Lentz v. Lentz, supra. Davis v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.

    227 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947

    Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N. C., 325 , 38 S. E. (2d), 97 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . … Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438 , 23 S. E. (2d), 310 . *686 Tbe cases of Rewis and Brown , above cited, are in full support of tbe conclusion bere reached.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Roulhac v. . Miller

    90 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

    Roulhac, Executrix, v. Wm. Gael Browne. Whereas, the above-named Wm. … Parker v. Smith, 64 N. C., 291 . The subject and the practice as affected by legislation are so fully considered in the recent cases of Rogers v. Moore, 86 N. C., 85 , and Wynne v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moody v. . Wike

    181 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

    Brown, of date 26 January, 1887, with continuous adverse possession under said deed, and the case on appeal states the position pertinent to plaintiffs’ claim as follows: “The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery proceedings … Stancill v. James, 126 N. C., 190 ; Hodge v. Powell, 96 N. C., 64 ; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . 64; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . There must be a New trial.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Braswell v. . Morrow

    195 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

    S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 . … Brown v. Louisburg 126 N. C., 701 ; Burns v. Womble, 131 N. C., 173 ; Smith v. R. R., 151 N. C., 479 ; Gregg v. Wilmington, 155 N. C., 23 ; Sircey v. Rees’ Sons, 155 N. C., 296 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Guthrie v. North Carolina Department of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leftwich v. United Federation of Dairy Herd

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 4, 2003

    pounds; (iv) limited standing of one hour maximum without breaks; (v) limited sitting of one hour without breaks; and (vi) no driving of an automobile. 7. … Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery, Hickory Tavern Furniture Co. , 151 N.C. App. 478 , 566 S.E.2d 167 (2002). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R.A v. Iredell-Statesville School District Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 2023

    authority,” Magana v. … See, e.g., Craig v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 646 S.E.2d 923, 925 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007), rev'd on other grounds, 678 S.E.2d 351; see also Barrett v. Board of Educ. of Johnston County, 13 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Cogdill

    137 N.C. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000

    Brown, and April. … State v. Rhodes, 321 N.C. 102, 105 , 361 S.E.2d 578, 580 (1987).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hensley v. Ashland, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2005

    See Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 4. … Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 7.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Giddens

    199 N.C. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009

    State v. Floyd, 148 N.C. … However, in State v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Stone v. Martin

    56 N.C. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982

    Hoffman v. … If so, state the amount of stock owned by Henry Brown and list any consideration paid by Henry Brown or any other person for this stock. 33.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Norkunas v. NC Hotel Associates Ltd.

    851 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 2011

    Brown’s connection to or role with the named Defendant. … Brown is a general manager of NC Hotel Associates Ltd., there has not been sufficient proof of service. See Tietex Interiors v. Am. Furniture Mfg., 1:06-CV-503, 2008 WL 906318 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26809 (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.