Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.48s
304 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981
See State v. Charles Fearing, 304 N.C. 471 , 284 S.E. 2d 487 (1981); State v. Duvall, 304 N.C. 557 , 284 S.E. 2d 495 (1981). The instant case, State v. … Judge Brown granted the State’s motion on 4 December (despite Judge Browning’s prior ruling to the contrary on an identical motion).
Cited 5 timesPublished35 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1851
This very point is decided, S. v. George , 29 N.C. 321 , and the decision is so well sustained by authority and upon principle as not to call for another word. PER CURIAM. Error. Cited: S. v. … Jackson , 82 N.C. 568 ; S. v. Turner , 119 N.C. 848 . *Page 62 (72)
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Paper Co. v. Hufham
81 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986
Etheridge v. Wescott, 244 N.C. 637 , 94 S.E. 2d 846 ; Williams v. Board of Education, 266 N.C. 761 , 147 S.E. 2d *609 381. … McCotter v. Barnes, 247 N.C. 480, 484 , 101 S.E. 2d 330, 333 (1958). The construction of a deed is a question of law for the court. Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 (1950).
Cited 6 timesPublishedN.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State
371 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2018
V. … V.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn re Assessment Against Property of Southern Railway Co.
196 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929
The fact that the resolution of the board was to the effect that the street be 45 feet from the railroad center and the street is almost wholly within the right of way, and the part assessed is entirely within the right of … Boddie v. Bond, 154 N. C., 359 , 70 S. E., 824 ; 10 R. C. L., 688, et seq. Its compulsion is one of fair play.” Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., at p. 519-20. Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.
Cited 6 timesPublished116 N.C. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1994
United States v. … Based on Lovasco , our Court in State v. Davis, 46 N.C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 28, 1995
G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C. App. 579 , 309 S.E.2d 701 (1983). 3. Mr. Tyrone Humphries was not contributorily negligent for the injuries which he sustained on or about 8 April 1990. … G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished261 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964
The contention that the order denying -alimony is supported by Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N.C. 742 , 138 S.E. 12 , s. c. 194 N.C. 673 , 140 S.E. 440 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Turner v. … Manifestly the Court 'did not intend to overrule it without referring thereto., but instead relied on Brown v. Brown, supra, and Lentz v. Lentz, supra. Davis v.
Cited 28 timesPublished227 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947
Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N. C., 325 , 38 S. E. (2d), 97 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . … Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438 , 23 S. E. (2d), 310 . *686 Tbe cases of Rewis and Brown , above cited, are in full support of tbe conclusion bere reached.
Cited 15 timesPublished90 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884
Roulhac, Executrix, v. Wm. Gael Browne. Whereas, the above-named Wm. … Parker v. Smith, 64 N. C., 291 . The subject and the practice as affected by legislation are so fully considered in the recent cases of Rogers v. Moore, 86 N. C., 85 , and Wynne v.
Cited 2 timesPublished181 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921
Brown, of date 26 January, 1887, with continuous adverse possession under said deed, and the case on appeal states the position pertinent to plaintiffs’ claim as follows: “The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery proceedings … Stancill v. James, 126 N. C., 190 ; Hodge v. Powell, 96 N. C., 64 ; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . 64; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . There must be a New trial.
Cited 3 timesPublished195 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928
S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 . … Brown v. Louisburg 126 N. C., 701 ; Burns v. Womble, 131 N. C., 173 ; Smith v. R. R., 151 N. C., 479 ; Gregg v. Wilmington, 155 N. C., 23 ; Sircey v. Rees’ Sons, 155 N. C., 296 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedGuthrie v. North Carolina Department of Education
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeftwich v. United Federation of Dairy Herd
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 4, 2003
pounds; (iv) limited standing of one hour maximum without breaks; (v) limited sitting of one hour without breaks; and (vi) no driving of an automobile. 7. … Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery, Hickory Tavern Furniture Co. , 151 N.C. App. 478 , 566 S.E.2d 167 (2002). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedR.A v. Iredell-Statesville School District Board of Education
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 2023
authority,” Magana v. … See, e.g., Craig v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 646 S.E.2d 923, 925 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007), rev'd on other grounds, 678 S.E.2d 351; see also Barrett v. Board of Educ. of Johnston County, 13 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown137 N.C. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000
Brown, and April. … State v. Rhodes, 321 N.C. 102, 105 , 361 S.E.2d 578, 580 (1987).
Cited 9 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2005
See Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 4. … Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 7.
Cited 0 timesPublished199 N.C. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009
State v. Floyd, 148 N.C. … However, in State v.
Cited 27 timesPublished56 N.C. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982
Hoffman v. … If so, state the amount of stock owned by Henry Brown and list any consideration paid by Henry Brown or any other person for this stock. 33.
Cited 12 timesPublishedNorkunas v. NC Hotel Associates Ltd.
851 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 2011
Brown’s connection to or role with the named Defendant. … Brown is a general manager of NC Hotel Associates Ltd., there has not been sufficient proof of service. See Tietex Interiors v. Am. Furniture Mfg., 1:06-CV-503, 2008 WL 906318 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26809 (M.D.N.C.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna