Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.14s

  • Deaton v. . Elon College

    226 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1946

    Rushing v. Utilities Co., supra; Perry v. Herrin , 225 N.C. 601 ; Benton v. Building Co. , 223 N.C. 809 , 28 S.E.2d 491 ; Morrison v. Mills Co. , 223 N.C. 387 , 26 S.E.2d 857 ; King v. … Covington v. Furniture Co. , 138 N.C. 374 ; Groome v. Statesville , 207 N.C. 538 , 177 S.E. 638 ; Williams v. Mfg. Co. , 180 N.C. 64 , 104 S.E. 31 ; Clements v. Power Co. , 178 N.C. 52 , 100 S.E. 189 ; Dunnevant v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Dunbar v. . Drainage Commissioners.

    198 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1930

    In Crawford v. Allen, 180 N. C., 245 , 104 S. E., 468 , quoting from Hudson v. Coble, 97 N. C., 263 , 1 S. … Murrill v. Murrill, 84 N. C., 182 , and many other cases.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Carlie C's Iga

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 18, 2006

    Brown performed surgery, or her cervical, arm and shoulder problems. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-53 (13); Booker v. Duke Medical Center, 297 N.C. 458 , 256 S.E.2d 189 (1979). … Willis v. Davis Indus., 13 N.C. App. 101 , 185 S.E.2d 28 (1971). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Assessment Against Property of Southern Railway Co.

    196 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

    The fact that the resolution of the board was to the effect that the street be 45 feet from the railroad center and the street is almost wholly within the right of way, and the part assessed is entirely within the right of … Boddie v. Bond, 154 N. C., 359 , 70 S. E., 824 ; 10 R. C. L., 688, et seq. Its compulsion is one of fair play.” Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., at p. 519-20. Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Norkunas v. NC Hotel Associates Ltd.

    851 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 2011

    Brown’s connection to or role with the named Defendant. … Brown is a general manager of NC Hotel Associates Ltd., there has not been sufficient proof of service. See Tietex Interiors v. Am. Furniture Mfg., 1:06-CV-503, 2008 WL 906318 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26809 (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • M.B. v. Triangle Math and Science Academy Board of Directors

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2025

    Defendant Triangle Math and Science Academy Board of Directors (the “Board”) controls and administers Triangle Math and Science Academy - Cary (the “Academy”), which is part of “the Triangle Math and Science … Brown & Son, Inc., 888 F.2d 322, 326–27 (4th Cir. 1989) (holding allegations of sex-based discrimination, and that plaintiff was “harassed [and] humiliated” were insufficient); Dobson v. Harris, 134 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ballard v. Grace Hospital, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 13, 2001

    Brown in January 1995. 6. Plaintiff saw Dr. Brown for back pain and spasms on January 25, 1995. … Stat. § 97-17 ; Vernon v. Steven L. Mabe Builders , 336 N.C. 425 (1994), Lewis v. Craven Regional Medical Center, 134 N.C. App. 438 , ___ S.E.2d ___ (1999). 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lance v. . Russell

    165 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1914

    by the said Brown, contesting the title of the said Brown through one J. … Brown for the land in controversy, and that he had executed his trust in good faith. (632) In the case of Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bailey

    97 N.C. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1990

    As in this case, the defendant in Brown did not object at trial to the instruction . . . but the Court held that the *479 ‘plain error’ rule adopted in State v. … Likewise, Brown and Mitchell require that defendant in this case be awarded a new trial on the charge of first-degree kidnapping. Accord State v. McClain, 86 N.C. App. 219 , 356 S.E.2d 826 (1987).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Commissioners v. . Assell

    194 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1927

    In Herring v. … Tate v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 812 ; Smathers v. Comrs. , 125 N.C. at p. 488; Henderson v. Wilmington , 191 N.C. 269 . In R. R. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.

    157 N.C. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2003

    The dissent cites Inland Greens HOA, Inc. v. Dallas Harris Real Estate-Construction, Inc., 127 N.C. App. 610 , 492 S.E.2d 359 (1997) and Board of Comm’rs of Roxboro v. … But see Brown v. Miller, 63 N.C.

    Cited 156 timesPublished
  • Garlock v. WAKE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

    712 S.E.2d 158 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2011

    Number two, Your Honor, we're asking for clear guidelines going forward, including for May 18th, which I would just note, is the day after the 56th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Brown versus *166 Board of … App.1971); see also Edwards v. City Council of City of Seattle, 3 Wash.App. 665 , 479 P.2d 120 (1970). Id. The Arizona Supreme Court, in Karol v. Board of Educ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Hinchman

    192 N.C. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

    State v. Ward, 127 N.C. … In State v. Evans, 145 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Hall

    134 N.C. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1999

    Darrold Brown (Brown), one of defendant’s roommates, testified for the State in exchange for a reduced sentence on a robbery charge. … See Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 116 , 53 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bullock v. . Williams

    213 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938

    Tbe prerequisites to tbe granting of motion for new trial for newly discovered evidence are fully set forth in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431 , 79 S. E., 690 ; also in Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N. C., 368 , 117 S. … E., 41 ; Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., 268 , 148 S. E., 233 ; S. v. Casey, 201 N. C., 620 , 161 S. E., 81 ; Love v. Queen City Lines, 206 N. C., 575 , 174 S. E., 514 ; Furniture Co. v. Cole, 207 N. C., 847 , 178 S.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Douglass v. Dawson

    190 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1925

    Hardware Co. v. Holt, 173 N. C., 308 ; Observer Co. v. Little, 175 N. C., 42 . … S., 1210; Besselliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65, 2 A. L. R., 862; Bender v. Speight, 159 N. C., 612 ; Black v. Power Co., 158 N. C., 468 ; Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N. C., 456 ; Smathers v. Bank, 135 N. C., 410 ; Coble v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Briggs v. City of Raleigh

    195 N.C. 223 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1928

    Dec., 759 ; City of Minneapolis v. Janney (Minn.), 90 N. W., 312 ; Downing v. Indiana State Board of Agriculture, 129 Ind., 443 , 28 N. E., 123, 614 , 12 L. R. A., 664; Shelby County v. … Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S., 487 ; English v. People, 96 Ill., 566 ; Bank v. Iola, 9 Kan., 689 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc.

    32 N.C. App. 693 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1977

    v. … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra. Whether the injury for which he seeks compensation arose out of and in the course of his employment is to be determined as in any other case.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Zimmerman v. Appalachian State University

    149 N.C. App. 121 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

    Dept. of Correction v. McNeely, 135 N.C. App. 587, 592 , 521 S.E.2d 730, 733 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. … Carpenter v. Brooks, 139 N.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kilcoyne v. Morgan

    405 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 1975

    See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The Chairman of the History Department, Dr. … Holliman v. Martin, 330 F.Supp. 1 (W.D.Va. 1971). In this case, the one year’s notice of non-retention was fair.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.