Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

0.77s

  • State v. Williams

    18 S.W.3d 461 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2000

    COURT: If you have another witness you want to call besides— WILLIAMS: Patrick Brown. COURT: If you wish to testify, you may get up and testify. WILLIAMS: Where’s the witness, Patrick Brown? … See State v. Ivy, 851 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo.App. E.D.1993); State v. Anthony, 857 S.W.2d 861, 868-69 (Mo.App.W.D.1993).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. CITY OF PLATTE WOODS

    303 S.W.3d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2010

    Ida Ryan appeal the circuit court’s judgment affirming the City of Platte Woods Board of Zoning Adjustment’s (BZA) decision denying their request for a variance.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tribune Publishing Co. v. Curators of the University of Missouri

    661 S.W.2d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983

    As succinctly put in Edwards v. St. … Dravo Corporation v. Spradling, 515 S.W.2d 512, 517 (Mo.1974); and Hyde v. City of Columbia, 637 S.W.2d 251, 262-63 (Mo.App.1982).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Leahey v. Cass Avenue & Fair Grounds Railway Co.

    97 Mo. 165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

    The defendant’s evidence tends to show that this and another boy by the name of Brown were .together on the street; that Brown jumped on the step to the front platform, and, in answer to a question of the driver, said he … State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 371 ; State v. Sneed, 88 Mo. 138 . 3. Jessop, the driver, was a witness for defendant.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Wolff v. Wohlien

    32 Mo. 124 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1862

    But the appellants object to Wilson v. … It is true the case of Wilson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Rushing

    935 S.W.2d 30 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1996

    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 742 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543 (plurality opinion); State v. Hornbeck, 492 S.W.2d at 802, 805 (Mo.1973). … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 742-43 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543-44 (plurality opinion). The facts recited above would lead a reasonable person to believe that drugs were present in the container felt by Officer Price.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • State v. Chism

    252 S.W.3d 178 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008

    Chism relies on cases from several foreign juris *188 dictions and State v. Brown, 231 S.W.3d 268 (Mo.App. W.D.2007), to support his argument. … State v. McClain, 824 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). In Brown , the prosecutor, during closing argument, stated that she would not throw her career away by suborning perjury. 231 S.W.3d at 272 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Hess Warming & Ventilating Co. v. Burlington Grain Elevator Co.

    280 Mo. 163 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1919

    [Milan Milling Co. v. Gorten, 93 Tenn. 590 ; Flint Walling Mfg. Co. v. McDonald, 21 S.E. 526 .]" To same effect are York Mfg. Co. v. Colley, 247 U.S. 21 ; Browning v. Waycross, 233 U.S. 21 . … V.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. Mays

    588 S.W.2d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1979

    Brown, consisted primarily of identification testimony. … State v. Cuckovich, 485 S.W.2d 16 (Mo. banc 1972); State v. Davis, 527 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.App.1975).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. McFall

    584 S.W.2d 435 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1979

    The holdings in the other two cases cited by defendant, State v. Maxwell, 502 S.W.2d 382, 391 (Mo.App.1973) and State v. … State v. Cushenberry, 157 Mo. 168 , 56 S.W. 737, 742 (1900); State v. Williams, 515 S.W.2d 544, 549 (Mo.1974); State v. Blackmore, 327 Mo. 708, 715-716 , 38 S.W.2d 32, 34-35 (1931); State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Whitehead v. Tapp

    69 Mo. 415 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

    The recent case of Brown v. Brown’s Admr., 68 Mo. 388 , is directly in point.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Luthy v. Woods

    6 Mo. App. 67 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1878

    But this subject need not here be further pursued, as in the case of Kent v. Curtis, 4 Mo. App. 121 , decided since Luthy v. … Walker v. Mauroe, 18 Mo. 564; Kimball v. Donald, 20 Mo. 577 ; Bank of Commerce v. Bogy, 44 Mo. 13 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis, Missouri v. Ryan Bertels

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2024

    ED. 2013); Banks v. Slay, 9 F.Supp.3d 1069 (E.D. Mo. 2014); Banks v. Slay, 789 F.3d 919 (8th Cir. 2015); Banks v. Slay, 196 F.Supp.3d 1021 (E.D. Mo. 2016); and Banks v. Slay, 875 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2017). … Weber v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Ball

    339 S.W.2d 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960

    In identifying Ball, in addition to the scar on his face, Krekeler was impressed with and remembered the brown ensemble, particularly the “tall brown hat.” … In State v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • McNamara v. St. Louis Transit Co.

    66 L.R.A. 486 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1904

    On the day in question about half past three p. m. he boarded defendant’s car at thirteenth and Olive streets, intending to go to Jefferson avenue, as a passenger on the car, having the money to pay his fare. … Jones, 51 Mo. 316 ; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536 ; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526 ; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322 ; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152 ; Welsh v. Stewart, 31 Mo. App. 376 ; Prueitt v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Botz v. Garrett

    236 Mo. App. 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1942

    [State ex rel. v. Kansas City, supra ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, supra .] … [State ex rel. v. Kansas City, supra ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, supra ; State ex rel. v. Holekamp (Mo. App.), 151 S.W.2d 685 ; Superior Press Brick Co. v. City of St. Louis (Mo.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State v. McCrary

    655 S.W.2d 79 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1983

    State v. Degraffenreid, 477 S.W.2d 57 (Mo. banc 1972). However, such testimony is admissible to rehabilitate the witness after he has been impeached. Degraffenreid; State v. Atkins, 545 S.W.2d 656 (Mo.App.1976). … Brown gave the police. Patricia Brown, the stepmother of the victim, was then put on the stand to rehabilitate Jeffrey Brown and his identification of appellant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

    765 S.W.2d 308 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1988

    Greenwell v. Huffman, 506 S.W.2d 28, 31 (Mo.App.1974); Robbins v. Brown-Strauss Corp., 363 Mo. 1157 , 257 S.W.2d 643, 648 (1953). … In fact, the plaintiff has qualified for and is collecting disability benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Berlin v. Pickett

    100 S.W.3d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2003

    Mathewson v. Board of Election Comm’rs of St. Louis County, 841 S.W.2d 633, 634 (Mo. banc 1992). Unless aggrieved by a judgment, a party has no standing to appeal. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. … Morris v. Brown, 941 S.W.2d 835, 839 (Mo.App.1997). The standard of review is that of a court-tried case. Kamil, Decker & Co., P.C. v. SMC Props., Inc. 998 S.W.2d 818, 819 (Mo.App.1999); City of Hamilton v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Scism v. Long

    280 S.W.2d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1955

    The Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis is created by an Act of the General Assembly, Chapter 84 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., hence is a body created by law. State ex rel. Murphy v. … McKittrick v. Wilson, 350 Mo. 486 , 166 S.W.2d 499 , 143 A.L.R. 1465 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.