Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
18 S.W.3d 461 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2000
COURT: If you have another witness you want to call besides— WILLIAMS: Patrick Brown. COURT: If you wish to testify, you may get up and testify. WILLIAMS: Where’s the witness, Patrick Brown? … See State v. Ivy, 851 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo.App. E.D.1993); State v. Anthony, 857 S.W.2d 861, 868-69 (Mo.App.W.D.1993).
Cited 8 timesPublished303 S.W.3d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2010
Ida Ryan appeal the circuit court’s judgment affirming the City of Platte Woods Board of Zoning Adjustment’s (BZA) decision denying their request for a variance.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTribune Publishing Co. v. Curators of the University of Missouri
661 S.W.2d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983
As succinctly put in Edwards v. St. … Dravo Corporation v. Spradling, 515 S.W.2d 512, 517 (Mo.1974); and Hyde v. City of Columbia, 637 S.W.2d 251, 262-63 (Mo.App.1982).
Cited 40 timesPublishedLeahey v. Cass Avenue & Fair Grounds Railway Co.
97 Mo. 165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888
The defendant’s evidence tends to show that this and another boy by the name of Brown were .together on the street; that Brown jumped on the step to the front platform, and, in answer to a question of the driver, said he … State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 371 ; State v. Sneed, 88 Mo. 138 . 3. Jessop, the driver, was a witness for defendant.
Cited 46 timesPublished32 Mo. 124 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1862
But the appellants object to Wilson v. … It is true the case of Wilson v.
Cited 3 timesPublished935 S.W.2d 30 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1996
Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 742 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543 (plurality opinion); State v. Hornbeck, 492 S.W.2d at 802, 805 (Mo.1973). … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 742-43 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543-44 (plurality opinion). The facts recited above would lead a reasonable person to believe that drugs were present in the container felt by Officer Price.
Cited 69 timesPublished252 S.W.3d 178 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008
Chism relies on cases from several foreign juris *188 dictions and State v. Brown, 231 S.W.3d 268 (Mo.App. W.D.2007), to support his argument. … State v. McClain, 824 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). In Brown , the prosecutor, during closing argument, stated that she would not throw her career away by suborning perjury. 231 S.W.3d at 272 .
Cited 34 timesPublishedHess Warming & Ventilating Co. v. Burlington Grain Elevator Co.
280 Mo. 163 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1919
[Milan Milling Co. v. Gorten, 93 Tenn. 590 ; Flint Walling Mfg. Co. v. McDonald, 21 S.E. 526 .]" To same effect are York Mfg. Co. v. Colley, 247 U.S. 21 ; Browning v. Waycross, 233 U.S. 21 . … V.
Cited 19 timesPublished588 S.W.2d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1979
Brown, consisted primarily of identification testimony. … State v. Cuckovich, 485 S.W.2d 16 (Mo. banc 1972); State v. Davis, 527 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.App.1975).
Cited 4 timesPublished584 S.W.2d 435 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1979
The holdings in the other two cases cited by defendant, State v. Maxwell, 502 S.W.2d 382, 391 (Mo.App.1973) and State v. … State v. Cushenberry, 157 Mo. 168 , 56 S.W. 737, 742 (1900); State v. Williams, 515 S.W.2d 544, 549 (Mo.1974); State v. Blackmore, 327 Mo. 708, 715-716 , 38 S.W.2d 32, 34-35 (1931); State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished69 Mo. 415 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879
The recent case of Brown v. Brown’s Admr., 68 Mo. 388 , is directly in point.
Cited 9 timesPublished6 Mo. App. 67 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1878
But this subject need not here be further pursued, as in the case of Kent v. Curtis, 4 Mo. App. 121 , decided since Luthy v. … Walker v. Mauroe, 18 Mo. 564; Kimball v. Donald, 20 Mo. 577 ; Bank of Commerce v. Bogy, 44 Mo. 13 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedCity of St. Louis, Missouri v. Ryan Bertels
Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2024
ED. 2013); Banks v. Slay, 9 F.Supp.3d 1069 (E.D. Mo. 2014); Banks v. Slay, 789 F.3d 919 (8th Cir. 2015); Banks v. Slay, 196 F.Supp.3d 1021 (E.D. Mo. 2016); and Banks v. Slay, 875 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2017). … Weber v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg.
Cited 0 timesPublished339 S.W.2d 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960
In identifying Ball, in addition to the scar on his face, Krekeler was impressed with and remembered the brown ensemble, particularly the “tall brown hat.” … In State v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedMcNamara v. St. Louis Transit Co.
66 L.R.A. 486 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1904
On the day in question about half past three p. m. he boarded defendant’s car at thirteenth and Olive streets, intending to go to Jefferson avenue, as a passenger on the car, having the money to pay his fare. … Jones, 51 Mo. 316 ; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536 ; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526 ; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322 ; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152 ; Welsh v. Stewart, 31 Mo. App. 376 ; Prueitt v.
Cited 33 timesPublished236 Mo. App. 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1942
[State ex rel. v. Kansas City, supra ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, supra .] … [State ex rel. v. Kansas City, supra ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, supra ; State ex rel. v. Holekamp (Mo. App.), 151 S.W.2d 685 ; Superior Press Brick Co. v. City of St. Louis (Mo.
Cited 22 timesPublished655 S.W.2d 79 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1983
State v. Degraffenreid, 477 S.W.2d 57 (Mo. banc 1972). However, such testimony is admissible to rehabilitate the witness after he has been impeached. Degraffenreid; State v. Atkins, 545 S.W.2d 656 (Mo.App.1976). … Brown gave the police. Patricia Brown, the stepmother of the victim, was then put on the stand to rehabilitate Jeffrey Brown and his identification of appellant.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTucker v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
765 S.W.2d 308 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1988
Greenwell v. Huffman, 506 S.W.2d 28, 31 (Mo.App.1974); Robbins v. Brown-Strauss Corp., 363 Mo. 1157 , 257 S.W.2d 643, 648 (1953). … In fact, the plaintiff has qualified for and is collecting disability benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board.
Cited 6 timesPublished100 S.W.3d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2003
Mathewson v. Board of Election Comm’rs of St. Louis County, 841 S.W.2d 633, 634 (Mo. banc 1992). Unless aggrieved by a judgment, a party has no standing to appeal. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. … Morris v. Brown, 941 S.W.2d 835, 839 (Mo.App.1997). The standard of review is that of a court-tried case. Kamil, Decker & Co., P.C. v. SMC Props., Inc. 998 S.W.2d 818, 819 (Mo.App.1999); City of Hamilton v.
Cited 13 timesPublished280 S.W.2d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1955
The Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis is created by an Act of the General Assembly, Chapter 84 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., hence is a body created by law. State ex rel. Murphy v. … McKittrick v. Wilson, 350 Mo. 486 , 166 S.W.2d 499 , 143 A.L.R. 1465 .
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna