Case law

Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina Division of Adult Corrections

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 5, 2022

Jan. 26, 2018) (same); see also Brown-Bey v. North Carolina, 3:19-cv-188-FDW, 2019 WL 6717045 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2019) (§ 1983 action dismissed pursuant to § 1915(g)); Brown-Bey v. N.C. … Oct. 29, 2021) (same); Brown-Bey v. North Carolina, 1:22-cv-00027-MR, 2022 WL 902746 (W.D.N.C. March 28, 2022) (same); Brown-Bey v. Mecklenburg Cnty.

Innovative 55, LLC v. Robeson County

253 N.C. App. 714 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2017

Standard of Review “‘A legislative body such as the Board [of Commissioners], when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body.’” Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. … The Board was concerned that the conditional use permit would affect property values within the - 14 -  INNOVATIVE 55, LLC V.

Harris v. McCrory

159 F. Supp. 3d 600 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2016

Citizens v. … See Stephenson v.

State v. Williams

350 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1999

Brown to testify or to introduce his report into evidence. At common law, neither the State nor a defendant enjoyed a right of discovery. State v. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 206 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 19 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987).

Lewis, Treasurer v. . Commissioners

192 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1926

Lassiter v. Comrs., 188 N. C., 379 . … Bernardin v. Duell, 172 U. S., 576 , 43 L. Ed., 559; Umstead v. Board of Elections, ante, 139; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 499 . Tbe judgment is Affirmed.

Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.

314 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 3, 1985

Glenn v. Board of Education of Mitchell County, 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 (1936). … Brown v. General Electric Co., 584 F. Supp. 1305 (E.D.N.C. 1983).

Halford v. . Senter

169 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1915

Tbe agreed facts are tbat plaintiff was duly elected superintendent of bealtb for Harnett County by tbe board of bealtb of said county and his compensation fixed by said board at tbe rate of $600 per annum. … Tbe very question presented here was decided by this Court adversely to plaintiff’s contention in McCullers v. Commissioners, 158 N.

Newcomb v. COUNTY OF CARTERET

365 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

Davis, and Pelham Jones v. COUNTY OF CARTERET, United States of America, George Brown, Julian M. … Brown, Julian Brown, Jr., Earl Chadwick, Temple Chadwick, Gloria Davis, Randy Frye, Norman Fulcher, Joe O'Neal Garner, Robert Guthrie, Sammy Guthrie, Gray Harris, Maureen Harris, *27 Myron Harris, Tammy Hill, David N.

State v. Liberato

156 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2003

State v. Benson, 331 N.C. 537, 544 , 417 S.E.2d 756, 761 (1992). … State v. Riggsbee, 72 N.C. App. 167, 171 , 323 S.E.2d 502, 505 (1984) (citations omitted). See also State v. Noffsinger, 137 N.C. App. 418, 424 , 528 S.E.2d 605, 609 (2000).

State v. Bailey

163 N.C. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2004

In State v. … In State v.

State v. . Bentley

223 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1943

S. v. Robertson , *Page 567 210 N.C. 266 , 186 S.E. 247 ; S. v. Smith , 201 N.C. 494 , 160 S.E. 577 ; S. v. Cox , 201 N.C. 357 , 160 S.E. 358 ; S. v. Spain , 201 N.C. 571 , 573 , 160 S.E. 834 ; S. v. … In S. v.

Quorum Health Resources, LLC v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.

552 F. Supp. 2d 527 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 29, 2007

Upon receipt of the letter, Defendant’s Board of Trustees met and considered the matter. … See, e.g., Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 393 , 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990).

Bell v. West American Insurance

89 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1988

Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 306 S.W. 2d 836 (Ky. 1957); Utilities Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 207 Okla. 574 , 251 P. 2d 175 (1952); Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. Central Produce Co., 42 F. Supp. 31 (M.D. … Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600 , 187 S.E. 2d 52 (1972), modified on other grounds, Lloyd v. Babb, 296 N.C. 416 , 251 S.E. 2d 843 (1979). Such is not the case here.

N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State

371 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2018

."); Elliott v. … Nonetheless, in Adams v.

State v. Williams

98 N.C. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1990

State v. Richardson, 36 N.C. App. 373, 376 , 242 S.E.2d 918 , 920 (1978). … See State v. Brown, 64 N.C. App. 578, 582 , 307 S.E.2d 831, 834 (1983).

State v. Cole

824 S.E.2d 921 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

Brown died as a result of the shooting. … State v. Belk , 201 N.C.

Farnsworth v. Jones

114 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1994

Our Supreme Court set forth the standard of review for local board decisions in Coastal Ready-Mix v. Board of Comm’rs, 299 N.C. 620 , 265 S.E.2d 379 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 105 N.C. App. 32, 36 , 411 S.E.2d 655, 658 (1992), (citing Coastal Ready-Mix v. Board of Comm’rs, 299 N.C. at 626 , 265 S.E.2d at 383 ).

Jacobs v. Mallard Creek Presbyterian Church, Inc.

214 F. Supp. 2d 552 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 2002

Circuit case Minker v. … In Smith v. Raleigh Dist. of N.C. Conf.

State v. Veazey

201 N.C. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2009

Ed. 2d 333 (2000), and if the purpose is valid, must consider whether the checkpoint was reasonable under the balancing test articulated in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357 (1979). Veazey, 191 N.C. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 51 , 61 L. Ed. 2d at 362 .

Eledge v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

230 N.C. 584 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1949

Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 . … G.S. 97-10; Brown v. R. R., supra ( 204 N.C. 668 ). The case of Sayles v. Loftis, 217 N.C. 674 , 9 S.E. 2d 393 , cited by the plaintiff appellee, is not in point.