Case law

Holman v. Bowman Business Associates, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 4, 2009

Boney v. Winn Dixie, Inc. , 163 N.C. App. 330 , 593 S.E.2d 93 (2004). 3. … Stat. §§ 97-2 (5), 97-29 ; Munoz v.

Smith v. N.C. Department of Transportation

156 N.C. App. 92 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2003

Jenkins v. Piedmont Aviation Servs., 147 N.C. App. 419, 427 , 557 S.E.2d 104, 109 (2001), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 303 , 570 S.E.2d 724 (2002) (quoting Keel v. H & V Inc., 107 N.C. … See Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667, 671 , 153 S.E.2d 335, 339 (1967). This broad discretion allows the Commission to weigh the evidence and award appropriate damages.

Miyares v. Forsyth County Department of Public Health

359 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2005

State v. Pender

218 N.C. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2012

First, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by instructing defendant to use cross-examination to test whether witness Brown’s testimony revealed significantly new or different information. See State v. … Second, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it decided to “[g]rant a continuance or recess” to defendant to review the testimony of Brown. N.C.G.S. § 15A-910(a)(2) (2011); see State v. Hocutt, 177 N.C.

Hamlet H.M.A., LLC v. Hernandez

262 N.C. App. 51 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2018

Brown in Superior Court, Richmond County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 March 2018. Thomerson Freeman & Rogers P.C., by William S. F. Freeman, for plaintiff- appellee. Mark L. … Williams’ testimony also shows that the New Hanover Board of Trustees considered qualifications as a paramount issue: “As to who has to make the choice, the Board has to determine with

State v. Tyson

189 N.C. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 1, 2008

Id. at 467 , 621 S.E.2d at 280 (quoting United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 , 92 L. Ed. 442 , 448, reh’g denied, 333 U.S. 850 , 92 L. Ed. 2d 1132 (1948)). … See State v. Petty, 100 N.C.

Moore v. Bank.

140 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1905

Vickers v. Logan, 44 N. C., 394 ; Jones v. Railroad, 125 N. C., 227 . In Kirkham v. Coe, 46 N. C., 423 , the judge upon the entire evidence instructed the jury that there was not probable cause. In Honeycut v. … Swaim v. Stafford, supra; Beale v. Roberson, supra. The defendant Brown knew that plaintiff was indebted to the bank in a large amount — that the debt was unsecured and had been running a long time, interest being paid.

Griffin v. United Services Life Insurance

225 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1945

C., 307 ; Brown v. … Holler v. Tel. Co., supra; Hatcher v. Dabbs, 133 N. C., 239 ; Brown v. Ruffin, supra; Owens v. Phelps, 95 N. C., 286 ; Colt Co. v. Barber, supra.

Department of Transportation v. Blevins

194 N.C. App. 637 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Clean River Corp., 178 N.C. App. 528, 531 , 631 S.E.2d 879, 882 (2006) (citation and emphasis omitted). In Barnes v. … E.g., DOT v. M.M.

Downing v. . White

211 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1936

E., 364 ; Card v. Finch, 142 N. C., 140 , 54 S. E., 1009 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 700 , 24 S. E., 527, 715 ; Armstrong v. Harshaw, 12 N. C., 187 . … Smathers v. Sprouse, 144 N. C., 637 , 57 S. E., 392 ; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 .

Gaither v. . Clement

183 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1922

The defendant was engaged in erecting a brick and concrete building, and had laid the concrete floors in the building, same having been poured in forms made of wood and supported by 2-inch boards held up by timbers 4 x 4. … Marks v. Cotton Mills , 135 N.C. 290 ; Nail v. Brown , 150 N.C. 535 ; Mercer v. R. R. , 154 N.C. 401 .

State v. Tidwell

323 N.C. 668 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1989

Brown to ask defendant what she, Mrs. Tidwell, had done to him. Ms. Brown did so. Defendant stated that Mrs. Tidwell had hit his car. Ms. Brown relayed this statement. Mrs. … . *675 In State v.

The N.C. State Bar v. Megaro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022

State v. Brown, 112 N.C. App. 390, 393, 436 S.E.2d 163, 165 (1993). … STATE BAR V.

Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Johnson

226 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1946

Tbe board of commissioners of Guilford County was empowered, to select three members of said board, one from High Point, one from Greensboro, and one from tbe county at large. … Brown v. Comrs., 223 N. C., 744 , 20 S. E. (2d), 104 ; Madry v. Scotland Neck, 214 N. C., 461 , 199 S. E., 618 ; Williamson v. High Point, supra; 38 Am. Jur., 85 , sec. 395, and 91, sec. 399.

Parsons v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp.

141 F.R.D. 408 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 14, 1992

Liggett Group, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (M.D.N.C.1986). … BNS v. Koppers (business strategy privilege held to expire as soon as the Koppers board formally acted on the tender offer).

Hutton v. Webb

124 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1899

Norfleet v. Cromwell, 70 N. C., 634 ; Brown v. Keener, 74 N. C.,712, at pp. 716, 717; The Code Sections 3707, 3710, 3711; State v. Moore, 104 N. C., at pp 720, 721 and 722; Sands v. Manistee, 123 U. … Act in question it has always been held that the Courts will not inquire into the motives of legislators of any kind of grade, whether it be the Congress of the United States, the Legislature of the State, or a municipal board

In Re Jenkins v. .

157 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

Brown v. Eaton , 91 N.C. 26 . We will now proceed to consider the other question, whether the paper was found in a proper place of deposit. … Hughes v. Smith, supra . This Court said in Winstead v.

Lipe v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.

207 N.C. 794 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935

Harrison v. Sluder, 197 N. C., 76 , 147 S. E., 684 ; Fertilized Co. v. Eason, 194 N. C., 244 , 139 S. E., 376 ; Brown v. Williams, supra; Patterson v. Franklin, supra; Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 , 83 S. … E., 241 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 , 65 S. E., 743 ; Whetstine v. Wilson, supra; Miller v. Lash, supra. 3.

State v. . Hopper

186 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1923

Jarrett v. Trunk Co. , 142 N.C. 469 ; May v. Menzies, ante , 144. … This kind of testimony was objected to in S. v. O'Higgins, supra , and Brown, J. , said: "The evidence that the defendant abandoned his motherless children in order to elope with Mrs.

Myles v. LMS Inc.

251 N.C. App. 526 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 30, 2016

DeWitt, a board-certified orthopaedic surgeon specializing in the foot and ankle complex. Dr. … See Peoples v.