Case law

Brown v. Ryder

42 N.J. Eq. 356 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1886

Brown, deceased, to probate, appointed James R. English administrator pendente lite, on the 28th of April, 1886. … Chanter, 2 Phillips 545 ; Scoffield v. Craddock, 7 Harr. & Johns. 40; Smith v. Davis, 45 H. H. 566; Cowles v. Hayes, 71 N. C. 230 ; Morrison v. Cones, 7 Blackf. 593 ; Broach v. Walker, 2 Ga. 428 ; Hunt v.

Bowman v. Brown

87 N.J. Eq. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

Brown v. Erie Railroad

87 N.J.L. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1914

The enacting clause of a statute may be extended by the preamble, but cannot he restrained by it. 36 Cyc. 1132; Den v. Urison, 2 N. J. L. *212, 224; James v. Dubois, 16 Id. 285; Quackenbush v. State, 57 Id. 18, 21. … Stat. 82; 1 Kent 460; Den v. Dubois, 1 Harr. 285 , 295.”

Bowman v. Brown

87 N.J. Eq. 47 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 2, 1917

In Watkins v. Nash, L. … This ruling was approved by the court of appeals in the later case -of London Freehold Co. v. Baron Suffield (1897), 2 Ch. 608. The case of the Ordinary v. Thatcher, *49 41 N. J. Law 403, is not in point.

Force v. Brown

32 N.J. Eq. 118 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

Brown; the language of the bequest being: “ To my son-in-law, the said Archibald K. Brown, an equal one-sixth part thereof.” The executors have in hand a considerable sum of money, payable to Mr. … The decree in Hardenburgh v. Blair, 3 Stew. 645 , rules this case.

Washer v. Brown

5 N.J. Eq. 81 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1845

Brown v. Morton

71 N.J.L. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

On September 12th, 1901, the board of directors of the company passed a resolution levying a call of $10 per share on the holders of the preferred stock of record on September 16th, 1901, $10 per share having previously been … Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railroad Co., 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 217; Loewenthal v. Rubber Co., 7 Id. 440; Clearwater v. Meredith, 1 Wall. 25, 40 ; Oregon Railroad Co. v. Oregonian Railroad Co., 130 U. S. 1 .

In Re Centex Homes, LLC

411 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 2009

No. 3, Piscataway v. … In Van Holten Group v.

Brown v. Folwell

7 N.J. Eq. 593 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1849

Brown v. Easton

30 N.J. Eq. 725 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1879

R. v. … forfeited by a decree dissolving the order and dismissing the bill), the defendants in that cause presented to the chancellor a petition for the rescinding of an order, granted on the opinion of the vice-chancellor (see Easton v.

State v. Lewis

116 N.J. 477 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 11, 1989

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 511 (1973). See also State v. … See Coolidge v.

State v. Brown-Bilal

229 N.J. 7 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 2017

Brown v. Lippincott

49 N.J. Eq. 44 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Cowley v. Knapp, 13 Vr. 297 ; Burdge v. Walling, 18 Stew. Eq. 10.

State v. Brown

53 N.J.L. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1890

Cantine v. Brown

46 N.J.L. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1884

The decision of this court in Kent v. Armstrong, 2 Hcilst. Gh. 637, disposes of the question. The devise in this case differs in no material respect from the devise which was construed in that.

Brown v. Coriell

50 N.J. Eq. 753 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

The undisputed facts in this ease are these: One Peter V. Conover had married a daughter of one Stephen Brown, senior. Peter V. Conover was indebted to his wife. … Conover, as the administrator of his deceased wife, against the executors of Stephen Brown, senior. The bill prays that the mortgage made by Peter V.

State v. Brown

59 N.J. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 13, 1971

J. while Brown and Jasper were in unlawful possession of marijuana. After jury trial, Jasper was convicted and Brown was acquitted on the first count. Both defendants were convicted on the second count. … However, the conviction of Jasper and Brown for contributing to the delinquency of the minor presents a different problem.

Beck v. Brown

8 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1950

BECK, SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST T. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 8, 1950. … Passage v. McVeigh, 23 N.J.L. 729 ( E. & A. 1852); Wilkinson v. Lyons, 87 N.J.L. 200 ( E. & *106 A. 1914).

Wills v. Brown

3 N.J.L. 548 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1809

Armstrong v. Brown

19 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

Brown, is the vendee, and the defendant, T. Joseph Binn, the assignee, of a written contract for the purchase of real estate owned by the plaintiffs. … Shultz v. Sanders, 38 N. J. Eq. 154 (Ch. 1884), affirmed sub nom. Eisberg v. Shultz, 38 N. J. Eq. 293 (E. & A. 1884); Wilkes v. Brennan, 139 N. J. Eq. 445 (Ch. 1947); Andes v. Boyajian, 12 N. J. Super. 344 (Ch.