Case law

Farmer v. Secretary of Commerce

923 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 2, 1996

Henson v. Liggett Group, Inc., 61 F.3d 270, 274 (4th Cir.1995) (quoting EEOC v. Clay Printing Co., 955 F.2d 936, 940 (4th Cir.1992)). See Fuller v. Phipps, 67 F.3d 1137, 1144 (4th Cir.1995). … See Douglas v. PHH FleetAmerica Corp., 832 F.Supp. 1002, 1009-10 (D.Md.1993). See also Smith v.

Hamlet H.M.A., LLC v. Hernandez

262 N.C. App. 51 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2018

Brown in Superior Court, Richmond County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 March 2018. Thomerson Freeman & Rogers P.C., by William S. F. Freeman, for plaintiff- appellee. Mark L. … Williams’ testimony also shows that the New Hanover Board of Trustees considered qualifications as a paramount issue: “As to who has to make the choice, the Board has to determine with

Griffin v. Springer

244 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1956

Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116 , 84 S.E. 2d 334 ; Bryant v. Shields, 220 N.C. 628 , 18 S.E. 2d 157 ; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80 , 116 S.E. 189 ; Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Gudger v. … Brown v. Brown, supra. In Mewborn v. Mewborn, supra, the testator in the part of his will relevant to the question before us used words strikingly similar to the language of the deed here.

State v. Daye

253 N.C. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2017

State v. Brown , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 787 S.E.2d 81 , 84 (2016) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … Brown , --- N.C. App. at ----, 787 S.E.2d at 84 -85 . Relying upon this Court's earlier decision in State v. Newcomb , 84 N.C.

Gingles v. Edmisten

590 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 1984

In 1960, twelve years later, after the ^upreme Court decision in Brown v. … Public schools in North Carolina were officially segregated by race until 1954 when Brown v. Board of Education was decided.

Shelton-Riek v. Story

75 F. Supp. 2d 480 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 19, 1999

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556-57 (1972). … Hicks v. Brown, 929 F.Supp. 1184 (E.D.Ark.1996).

Khan v. West

122 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 10, 2000

Selgeka v. Carroll, 184 F.3d 337, 342-43 (4th Cir.1999). … Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965)).

Busby v. Simmons

103 N.C. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1991

In Brown v. Truck Ins. Exchange, 103 N.C. … Co. v.

McIntyre v. Clarkson

254 N.C. 510 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1961

In Brown v. … Board of Managers v. Wilmington, 237 N.C. 179 , 74 S.E. 2d 749 (1953).

In Re Hayes

151 N.C. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 2002

Brown confirmed that such an “angry outburst” could be violent. Dr. … Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 , 118 L. Ed. 2d 437 (1992), does not help respondent.

Terrell v. . Wiggins

23 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1840

by the now plaintiff that Brown had confessed a judgment to him during the interval, and he had seized Brown's property under the execution; that Brown's property was accordingly sold to satisfy the now plaintiff's demand … Goodman v. Smith , 15 N.C. 450 ; Bank v. Pugh , 9 N.C. 389 . PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Cited: Reed v. Moore , 25 N.C. 314 ; S. v. Gallimore , 29 N.C. 148 . (174)

Addison v. Moss

122 N.C. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1996

State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588, 597 , 187 S.E.2d 85, 91 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 34 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1972) (emphasis added). … State v. Jones, 287 N.C. 84, 91 , 214 S.E.2d 24, 29 (1975) (citation omitted).

Barclays American/Mortgage Corp. v. BECA Enterprises

116 N.C. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 1994

Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc. 331 N.C. 57, 63 , 414 S.E.2d 339, 342 (1992); (emphasis added) (quoting Collingwood v. G.E. Real Estate Equities, 324 N.C. 63, 66 , 376 S.E.2d 425, 427 (1989)). … Williamson v. Savage, 104 N.C. App. 188, 192 , 408 S.E.2d 754, 756 (1991).

Simmons v. Lee

230 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949

J., in the case, of Cotton Mills v. Maslin, 200 N.C. 328 , 156 S.E. 484 . See also Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 ; Cheshire v. … Woody v. Fountain, 143 N.C. 66 , 55 S.E. 425 . See also Smith v. Johnson, 137 N.C. 43 , 49 S.E. 62 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N.C. 450 , 55 S.E. 350 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N.C. 205 , 71 S.E. 302 ; Hill v.

Bracey Advertising Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

62 N.C. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1983

Advertising Co. v. Dept. of Transportation, 35 N.C. App. 226 , 241 S.E. 2d 146 , disc. rev. denied, 295 N.C. 89 , 244 S.E. 2d 257 (1978). Another decision, Days Inn v. Board of Transportation, 24 N.C. … See Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 281 N.C. 715 , 190 S.E. 2d 175 (1972).

Young v. . Highway Commission

190 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1925

Woodall v. Highway Commission , 176 N.C. 377 ; Davis v. Lenoir , 178 N.C. 668 ; Hargrave v. Comrs. , 168 N.C. 626 ; Murphy v. Webb , 156 N.C. 402 . … R. v.

City of Greensboro v. Hodgin

106 N.C. 182 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Johnston v. JP STEVENS AND COMPANY

234 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 1964

In Fusco v. Richard W. … Store Union, AFL-CIO v. Rains, 266 F.2d 503 (5th C.C.A. 1959). It is clear that the Board is not entitled to the injunction merely because it asked for one; Hecht Company v.

State v. Veazey

191 N.C. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2008

In Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 61 L. … See, e.g., State v.

State v. . Hopper

186 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1923

Jarrett v. Trunk Co. , 142 N.C. 469 ; May v. Menzies, ante , 144. … This kind of testimony was objected to in S. v. O'Higgins, supra , and Brown, J. , said: "The evidence that the defendant abandoned his motherless children in order to elope with Mrs.