Case law

State v. Odom

369 S.W.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1963

He also observed the child huddled on the floor board of defendant’s automobile as it went down Eighth Street. … slacks, brown slippers, brown *176 socks, a white T-shirt and a gold sweater, but when he was arrested he had on jeans, brown slippers, brown socks, a white T-shirt and a gold sweater; that he had used the rock found in

Youngman v. Doerhoff

890 S.W.2d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1994

In Ross v. … See e.g., Ross v. Robb, supra; Kimble v. Worth County R-111 Bd. of Educ., 669 S.W.2d 949 (Mo.App.1984) (theft); Gerig v.

Carlin v. Bacon

322 Mo. 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1929

[Browne, Stat. of Frauds (5 Ed.) sec. 276, p. 361.] The contract is not within any of the provisions of the Statute of Frauds. … [Lynn v. Hockaday, supra, 1. c. 125.]

Law v. City of St. Louis

292 Mo. 384 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1922

front end of the car tilted up, the steering wheel veered around suddenly, the car crossed the track toward the south, turned completely around and then over on its side, catching one of plaintiff's legs between the running board … Small, C., concurs; Brown C., absent. *Page 391

American Legion Phillips Post v. City of Malden

330 S.W.2d 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1959

Lincoln v. Bird, 295 Mo. 344 , 244 S.W. 938 ; State ex rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, Mo., 296 S.W.2d 482 ; State ex inf. Latham ex rel. Dawes v. Allen, 361 Mo. 963 , 237 S.W.2d 489 ; see 18 Am. … Brown v. Sengstacken, 61 Or. 455 , 122 P. 292 ; Shekelton v. Toole County, 97 Mont. 213 , 33 P.2d 531 ; or Coffee v. Lieb, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 406 ; and Ward v.

State Ex Rel. Riordan v. Dierker

956 S.W.2d 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1997

Sec. v. Taney County Dist. R-III, 922 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Mo. banc 1996) (quoting Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of Revenue, 762 S.W.2d 29, 31 (Mo. banc 1988)). … County of Jefferson v. Quiktrip Corp., 912 S.W.2d 487, 490 (Mo. banc 1995).

Keller v. Mayer Fertilizer Co.

153 Mo. App. 120 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1910

[Sharp v. Rhiel, 55 Mo. 97 ; Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.), sec. 285.] … [See Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.), sec. 277; Foster v. McO’Blenis, 18 Mo. 88 .]

State ex rel. Wyatt v. Vaile

122 Mo. 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1894

State ex rel. v. Scott, 96 Mo. 72 ; State ex rel. v. Hurt, 113 Mo. 90 ; State ex rel. v. Hutchinson, 116 Mo. 399 . … Simms, 108 Mo. 222 ; Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 194 .

Olds v. St. Louis National Baseball Club

232 Mo. App. 897 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1937

Louis Browns, a member of the American League, to play games scheduled by that League to be played in St. Louis. … The case of Quinn et al. v.

Mottl v. Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation

133 S.W.3d 142 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2004

Following the decision in March 2003 in Brown v. … Brown, 538 U.S. at 239 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 .

Powers v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

334 Mo. 432 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1933

BROWNE: I didn't hear that. A. … [Curtis v. Railway, 118 Mo. App. 341 , 94 S.W. 762 ; Wait v. Railway, 204 Mo. 491 , 103 S.W. 60 ; Hurr v. Railway, 141 Mo. App. 217 , 124 S.W. 1057 ; Whitwell v. Aurora, 139 Mo. App. 597 , 123 S.W. 1045 ; Stephens v.

State Ex Rel. Nesser v. Pennoyer

887 S.W.2d 394 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1994

Stanhope v. Pratt, 533 S.W.2d 567, 575 (Mo. banc 1976). … Ex parte Brown, 530 S.W.2d at 231 . Omission from the order of “the facts and circumstances constituting the contempt” entitles a habeas corpus petitioner to immediate release. Ex parte Vokolek v.

State ex rel. Hawley v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC

558 S.W.3d 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 21, 2018

Co. v. Mo. Highway & Transp. … ."); Stein v.

Henson v. Pascola Stave Co.

151 Mo. App. 234 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1910

Co. v. … [Friedman v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 101 Fed. l. c. 535; Oglesby v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 177 Mo. l. c. 310, 76 S. W. 623 ; Browning v. Wabash W. Ry. Co., 124 Mo. 55 , 27 S. W. 644 ; Lewis v. St. L. & I. M. R.

Cunningham v. Williams

43 Mo. App. 629 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1891

Browne on Stat. of Frauds, sec. 365; Mastin v. Grimes, 88 Mo. 478 . No distinction is made whether the section reads '■'■party to be charged” or “parties to be charged.” The same construction is adopted. … Browne Stat. of Frauds, sec. 365. This record discloses no error in the action of the trial court. Its judgment is, therefore, affirmed. All concur.

Wiles v. Capitol Indem. Corp.

75 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 1999

Id. at 187 , citing Anderson v. Home Ins. Co., 724 F.2d 82, 83 (8th Cir.1983). … Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995) (citations omitted). Missouri recognizes the general rule of agency law that a principal cannot conspire with one of its own agents. See Metts v.

Jackson v. Conway

476 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 5, 1979

See Brown v. Weinberger, 417 F.Supp. 1215 (D.D.C.1976). … Lora v. Board of Education of New York, 456 F.Supp. 1211 (E.D.

McFadden v. United States

362 F. Supp. 1106 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1973

Stewart, 8 Cir., 445 F.2d 897 , and Kibby v. United States, 71-1074, the three eases being remanded for a plenary hearing. … The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Patrick v.

M.H. v. Garcia

385 S.W.3d 489 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2012

Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 146 (Mo.App. W.D.2007). Pro se appellants are not to be granted preferential treatment. Id. … , 211 S.W.3d at 147 (quoting Shumpert v.

Trammell v. Vaughan

51 L.R.A. 854 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1900

[Allen v. Baker, 86 N. C. 91 ; Sanders v. Coleman, 97 Va. 690 ; Shackleford v. Hamilton, 93 Ky. 80 ; Mabin v. Webster, 129 Ind. 430 .] … in breaking her promise to marry Brown.