Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1800

10,000+ results

1.40s

  • Benjamin v. Schwartz

    299 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 2004

    Koenigsmann, and qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity is available to a public official whose conduct “does not violate a clearly established statutory or constitutional right.” Richardson v. Selsky, 5 F.3d 616, 621 (2d Cir.1993).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Toevs v. Reid

    685 F.3d 903 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 2, 2012

    Our conclusion that defendants are entitled to judgment on the “clearly established” portion of the qualified-immunity test obviates any need to remand this case. … Because the law was not clearly established, defendants are entitled to judgment based on qualified immunity. C.

    Cited 254 timesPublished
  • Santana v. Calderon

    342 F.3d 18 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Aug 26, 2003

    It is important for the "clearly established" prong of the qualified immunity analysis to note that Quiles was decided on November 7, 2001, after Santana's dismissal from her job in this case. … the Puerto Rico Constitution, is to focus on the second step of the qualified immunity analysis -- the clearly established question

    Cited 127 timesPublished
  • Ann Robinette Eric Robinette v. William Jones Richard Fentiman Tim Gassen Joshua Landis Merritt M. Beck, III City of Centralia, Missouri

    476 F.3d 585 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 8, 2007

    Whether an official is entitled to qualified immunity depends upon the “objective legal reasonableness” of the official’s actions “assessed in light of the legal rules that were ‘clearly established’ ” at the time of the … Robi-nette, the constitutional right was not clearly established. 8 The warrant to arrest Ms.

    Cited 143 timesPublished
  • Armijo Ex Rel. Chavez v. Wagon Mound Public Schools

    159 F.3d 1253 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Oct 28, 1998

    “Such immunity is qualified in that it does not obtain when otherwise immune officials violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Id. … that the relevant law was clearly established when the alleged violation occurred.

    Questioned — as noted by a later courtCited 196 timesPublished
  • Nash v. Douglas County

    733 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Nov 17, 1989

    Qualified Immunity Harper, Hale, Copeland and Holmes, (“the law officer defendants”), assert that they are entitled to summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. … The qualified immunity defense, first recognized by the Supreme court in Pierson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Stewart

    297 F. Supp. 2d 1328 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 16, 2004

    The Supreme Court has established a two-part test for evaluating claims of qualified immunity. … We find it does not ... ”). 3 Because no “offensiveness to others” element was clearly established under Fla. Stat. § 796.07 at the time of the arrests, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Grabowski

    922 F.2d 1097 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 31, 1990

    Anderson’s strict elaboration of Harlow , establishing that an official is entitled to summary judgment on grounds of qualified immunity, unless the right that the official is alleged to have violated is both clearly established … established constitutional duty and that he was entitled to qualified immunity.

    Disagreed with by Rosenberg v. Vangelo, 93 F. App'x 373 (2004)Cited 289 timesPublished
  • Foley v. University of Houston System

    324 F.3d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 6, 2003

    Public officials are entitled to qualified immunity when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known”. Harlow v. … However, the test for qualified immunity is whether the Appel-lees have asserted the deprivation of a statutory right under clearly established law.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Harrod v. Caney

    547 S.W.3d 536 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Feb 23, 2018

    Harrod filed an interlocutory appeal, arguing the claims against him are barred by absolute immunity and qualified immunity. … Coroners are entitled to qualified immunity both by statute and pursuant to common law.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Elkins v. McKenzie

    865 So. 2d 1065 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 30, 2003

    The first step in the qualified immunity analysis is to determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the violation of a clearly established federal constitutional (or federal statutory) right. Hare v. … To ensure that qualified immunity serves its intended purpose, it is of paramount import, during step two, to define "clearly established law" at the proper level of generality. Anderson v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jorden Brown v. Samuel Giles

    95 F.4th 436 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 2024

    Officer Giles argues he’s entitled to qualified immunity. To overcome that immunity, Brown must show it’s clearly established that tasing him in this particular context was excessive. See Pearson v. … Qualified immunity demands no such thing. Regardless, the relevant law is clearly established here.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Blue v. Koren

    865 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 13, 1994

    Qualified Immunity The defense of qualified immunity must be addressed first, because if Defendants are immune we do not need to assess Plaintiffs substantive claims. … These three cases are not clearly instructive on the qualified immunity standard to be applied in a retaliation case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Derrick Newman v. James Guedry

    703 F.3d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 21, 2012

    and on the § 1983 claim on the basis of qualified immunity. … The officers maintain that their conduct was not objectively unreasonable in light of clearly established law at the time of the incident.

    Cited 244 timesPublished
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center - El Paso v. Gloria Bustillos

    556 S.W.3d 394 · Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Jun 13, 2018

    First, the federal court’s ruling was based on “qualified immunity” which evaluates whether there was a violation of a constitutional right and whether that right was clearly established at the time. … (recognizing that the terms “official immunity” and “qualified immunity” are often used interchangeably, but that the doctrines are separate defenses; qualified immunity applies when federal law claims are raised while

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McKinney v. City of Tukwila

    13 P.3d 631 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 9, 2000

    clearly established at the time it was taken." … In light of the above case law, we find that the impropriety of the officers' actions here is not clearly established. We thus find that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity from suit under section 1983. C.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Good v. Curtis

    601 F.3d 393 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 23, 2010

    immunity defense if he procures false identification by unlawful means . . . for such activity violates clearly established constitutional principles.” 849 F.2d at 1559. … in light of clearly established law.”

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Zeigler v. Kirschner

    162 Ariz. 77 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Oct 5, 1989

    Additionally, the defense of qualified immunity based on an official’s objectively reasonable reliance on clearly established law is a personal one which is entirely unavailable to him in an action against him in his official … immunities established by A.R.S. §§ 12-820.01 and 12-820.02, respectively.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Bartell v. Lohiser

    12 F. Supp. 2d 640 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jul 1, 1998

    whether the conduct of which the plaintiff complains violated clearly established law.” … Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity as to plaintiffs ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims because plaintiff has failed to show that defendants violated a clearly established right of which they should have known. 4

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • L.R. v. Philadelphia School District

    836 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 6, 2016

    , however, when public officials violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a concerns only the District Court’s denial of Littlejohn’s claim of qualified immunity. 6 Mitchell v. … “Even if none exists, it may be possible that a ‘robust consensus of cases of persuasive authority’ in the Court[s] of Appeals could clearly establish a right for purposes of qualified immunity.”60 Defining the right

    Cited 235 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.