Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.82s
70 N.C. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1984
State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 511, 516 , 64 S.E. 2d 871, 875 (1951) (citations omitted). In State v. Johnson, 23 N.C. … See State v. Henry, 31 N.C. 463 (1849); State v. Wilson, 289 N.C. 531 , 223 S.E. 2d 311 (1976).
Cited 4 timesPublished708 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 1988
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill clearly states the appropriate inquiry and the requirements of due process.
Cited 14 timesPublished186 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1923
Brown to pay W. W. Parlier the notes of $300 that Brown owed Par-lier under the facts in the case, if true, was a binding contract, founded on a valuable consideration and enforceable. J. F. Brown owed W. W. … See Woodcock v. Bostic, 118 N. C., 822 ; Way v. Transportation and Storage Co., ante, 224.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMarvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc.
216 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 22, 1963
See: Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. … See: United States v. 25,406 Acres of Land, 172 F.2d 990 (4th Cir., 1949).
Cited 2 timesPublished792 S.E.2d 779 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished79 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1986
See United States v. … See, e.g., State v.
Cited 3 timesPublished296 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1978
State v. Britt, supra; State v. Self, 280 N.C. 665 , 187 S.E. 2d 93 (1972). … Marshall Brown has admitted that Brown shot Drew Morrison and killed him and that Brown was testifying under an agreement with the State for a charge reduction in exchange for his testimony from first-degree murder to what
Cited 16 timesPublishedTabron v. Gold Leaf Farms, Inc.
269 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1967
Reference is made to Stanley v. Brown, 261 N.C. 243 , 134 S.E. 2d 321 , for a full statement of the factual situation considered therein. … This Court held the 1962 order was void as to Brown and that the plaintiff’s action for personal injuries against Brown should have been nonsuited.
Cited 10 timesPublishedG.D. v. KANNAPOLIS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2023
P. 17(b) (1); accord Hudnall v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown41 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1849
Gilkey v. Dickerson, 2 Hawks. 341 ; Brasfield v. Whitaker, 4 Hawks. 309. … Bell v Hill, 1 Hay. 72 . Ricks v. Blount, 4 Dev. 128 . Jones v. Judkins, 4 Dev. & Bat. 454.
Cited 4 timesPublished158 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2003
See Commonwealth v. … Similarly, in State v. Cobb, 150 N.C.
Cited 6 timesPublished85 N.C. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 1987
See, e.g., Pekelis v. Transcontinental and Western Air, Inc., 187 F. 2d 122 (2d Cir. 1951) (defendant used report of accident investigating board as a basis for remedial measures); United States v. … See, e.g., Hasty v. Turner, 53 N.C. App. 746 , 281 S.E. 2d 728 (1981); Emerson v. Carras, 33 N.C. App. 91 , 234 S.E. 2d 642 (1977).
Cited 14 timesPublishedWelch Ex Rel. Johnson v. Jenkins
271 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1967
Adams v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506, 512 , 103 S.E. 2d 854, 858 ; accord, Wilson v. Bright, 255 N.C. 329 , 121 S.E. 2d 601 ; Hutchens v. Southard, 254 N.C. 428 , 119 S.E. 2d 205 . … Justice Brown, for the Court, stated the law with clearness and precision. . . .” Id. at 37, 67 S.E. at 31 . In Rimmer v. R.
Cited 22 timesPublishedDoe v. Wilkes County Schools Board of Education
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 3, 2023
Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983). … In Davis v. Monroe Cnty.
Cited 0 timesUnknown333 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1993
State v. Keel, 333 N.C. 52, 58 , 423 S.E.2d 458, 462 (1992); N.C.G.S. § 14-17 (Supp. 1992). … See State v. Shank, 322 N.C. 243, 248 , 367 S.E.2d 639, 643 (1988).
Cited 18 timesPublished150 N.C. 276 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1909
Brown, J. The evidence, taken in the most favorable light for the plaintiff, establishes these facts: On 23 November, 1907, about 7 P. … In the case of Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublished184 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922
S., ch. 95, secs. 5469-5526, etc., also Laws 1921, ch. 179, that while county boards of education are given power to consolidate special tax districts, observing the provisions of the statutes in reference thereto, when they … S. v. Cooper, 101 N. C., 684 ; Riggsbee v. Durham, 98 N. C., 81 ; School District v. School District, 45 Kansas, 543; Voss v. School District, 18 Kansas, 467; Keweenaw Asso. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished278 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971
Relying upon State v. … See also Nissen v. Winston-Salem, 206 N.C. 888 , 175 S.E. 310 ; Duncan v. Board of Fire & Police Com’rs, etc., 131 N. J. L. 443, 37 A. 2d 85 ; Johnson v. Pease, 126 Wash. 163 , 217 P. 1005 ; Driscoll v.
Cited 28 timesPublished272 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1968
This Court said in S. v. … S. v. Craddock, supra; S. v. Boyd, 223 N.C. 79 , 25 S.E. 2d 456 . S. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna