Case law

Scrivner v. American Car and Foundry Co.

330 Mo. 408 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1932

Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. Wanamaker Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 , 90 S.W. 737 .] … [Butler v. Lawson, 72 Mo. 227 ; Bulkley v. Big Muddy Iron Co., 77 Mo. 105 ; Gregory v. McCormick, 120 Mo. 657 , 25 S.W. 565 ; Ashton v. Penfield, 233 Mo. 391 , 135 S.W. 938 ; New England Loan Trust Co. v. Brown, 59 Mo.

Utility Service & Maintenance, Inc. v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

163 S.W.3d 910 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 2005

Louis law firm of Brown & James to represent Noranda in the lawsuit. … This Court held, in Alack v.

Watkins v. Missouri Department of Corrections

349 S.W.3d 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2011

On appeal, he claims the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) improperly treated his unclassified rape conviction as a class A felony for purposes of calculating his parole eligibility … Phillips v. Mo. Dep’t of *427 Corr., 323 S.W.3d 790, 793 (Mo.App.2010); Stone v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., Prob. & Parole Bd., 313 S.W.3d 158, 161 (Mo.App.2010); State v. Dean, 898 S.W.2d 704, 706-07 (Mo.App.1995).

State v. Potter

560 S.W.2d 29 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1977

In their briefs, both parties cite State v. … State v.

State ex rel. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, Relator v. The Honorable Joseph L. Green

576 S.W.3d 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 2019

V, sec. 4. A writ of mandamus may issue upon proof of a “clear, unequivocal specific right to a thing claimed.” U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 (Mo. banc 2013) (quoting Furlong Cos. v. … Louis v. Kinder, 698 S.W.2d 4, 6 (Mo. banc 1985). When there “is a specific venue provision; it supersedes the general venue statute, section 508.010.” Igoe v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus.

Peoples v. Conway

897 S.W.2d 206 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995

Louis City Board of Police Commissioners (the Police Commissioners) as defendants. The plaintiff filed an amended petition against the City of St. … Burnett v. Griffith, 739 S.W.2d 712, 713 (Mo.1987) (citing McGinnis v. Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co., 200 Mo. 347 , 98 S.W. 590 (1906)).

Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

381 S.W.2d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1964

Oscar Brown, as notary public, purported to take the acknowledgment on the assignment. … Oscar Brown, as notary public, again purported to take the acknowledgment on the reassignment which was signed “Proctor & Brown Used Cars — By Waldo Proctor (Partner).”

Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis v. Members of the Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis

92 S.W.3d 785 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 2003

The commission argues that this Court in Abernathy v. City of St. … State ex rel Baumruk v. Belt, 964 S.W.2d 443, 446 (Mo. banc 1998).

Powell v. Missouri Department of Corrections

152 S.W.3d 363 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

Nixon v. American Tobacco Co., 34 S.W.3d 122, 134 (Mo. banc 2000). … Therefore, following the enactment of the amendments to § 559.115, the Board should have recalculated Appellant’s parole eligibility date. Unlike the situation in Irvin v.

Hudson v. State

563 S.W.3d 834 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2018

Smith") and Daniel Brown ("Mr. Brown"), Movant's trial counsel, testified at the evidentiary hearing. Mr. … Watson v. State , 520 S.W.3d 423 , 436 (Mo. banc 2017) ; see also McKee v. State , 336 S.W.3d 151 , 154 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011) ; Love v. State , 670 S.W.2d 499 , 502 (Mo. banc 1984).

Fountain v. St. Joseph Water Co.

352 Mo. 817 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1944

Brown Materials Ltd., 48 Fed. Supp. 740 (sand, gravel and other building materials); see also discussion in Brown v. Minngas Co. (D. C.), 51 Fed. … [See Chapman v. Home Ice Co. (U. S. C. C.

Macon County Emergency Services Board v. Macon County Commission, Alan Wyatt, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner, Drew Belt, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner, and Jon Dwiggins, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner

485 S.W.3d 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2016

Kirkwood Glass Co. v. … V. sec. 3. 4 auspice of statutory construction. Sw. Bell Yellow Pages, Inc. v.

Sherlock v. Duck Creek Township

338 Mo. 866 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1936

Brown, 104 Wis. 493 ; United States Natl. Bank v. Shupak (Mont.), 172 P. 324 ; First Natl. Bank v. Chilson, 45 Neb. 257 ; Cashion Gin Co. v. Reisch (Okla.), 289 P. 701 ; Carpenter v. … McLaughlin, 12 R.I. 270 ; Wood Co. v. Merchants' Saving, etc., Co., 41 Ill. 267 ; Glatt v. Fortman, 120 Ind. 384 ; State Natl. Bank v. Hyatt, 75 Ark. 170 ; Binghampton Pharmacy v. First Natl.

In Re - V

306 S.W.2d 461 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1957

Is the portion of Article V, § 20, in question self-executing? … Folk v. City of St. Louis, 250 Mo. 116 , 157 S.W. 71, 76 ; State ex rel. O’Connor v. Riedel, 329 Mo. 616 , 46 S.W.2d 131, 134 .

Kent v. Highleyman

17 Mo. App. 9 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1885

. — Brown v. Kimmel, 67 Mo. 430 ; Cape Girardeau, &c., R. Co. v. Kimmel, 58 Mo. 83 ; Ward v. Farrelly, 9 Mo. App. 370 . … v.

State v. Simpson

471 S.W.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

The same point was raised in State v. Browning, Mo., 442 S.W.2d 55 . In that case, Browning and others were guests at a private party. As the party “broke up”, Browning discovered that his coat was missing. … State v. Haygood, Mo., 411 S.W.2d 230 ; State v. Malone, Mo., 301 S.W.2d 750 ; State v. Vincent, Mo., 321 S.W.2d 439 .

Elliott v. Hogan

315 S.W.2d 840 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1958

Woodmansee v. Ridge, 343 Mo. 702 , 123 S.W.2d 20 ; State ex rel. Hay v. Flynn, 235 Mo.App. 1003 , 147 S.W.2d 210 ; State ex rel. Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S.W.2d 104 ; State ex rel. Haller v. … Ellis v. Brown, supra, and Hehl v. Guion, 155 Mo. 76 , 55 S.W. 1024 . With this guide in mind, we turn to a consideration of §§ 112.010 et seq. RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. concerning absentee voting.

Claim for benefits of Howard v. Joplin Stone Co.

446 S.W.3d 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2014

(“Brown”), who was identified as the “Human Resource Manager” for Joplin Stone. … In Bydalek v.

Atchison v. Pease

96 Mo. 566 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

We held in the case of Jacobs v. … The same doctrine is asserted in' the subsequent case of Schad v. Sharp, 95 Mo. 574 .

Mashak v. Poelker

367 S.W.2d 625 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1963

Co. v. Loeb, Mo., 318 S.W.2d 246, 252 [1]; Haynes v. … Knight v.