Case law

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 29, 1986

American Synthetic Rubber Corp. v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 422 F.2d 462, 465 (6th Cir.1970), quoting Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U.S. 491 , 33 S.Ct. 148 , 57 L.Ed. 314 (1913). … Plaintiff seeks to avoid this result by styling its action as one for negligence not based on the Schenkers-Old Dominion or Brown contracts. The Supreme Court’s decision in Great Northern Railway Co. v.

First Union Corp. v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

2001 NCBC 07 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 26, 2001

BROWNING, JOHN T. CASTEEN, III,) THOMAS K. HEARN, JR., GEORGE W. ) HENDERSON, III, W. HAYNE HIPP, LLOYD U.) NOLAND, III, JOHN C. … See Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc., 761 F.2d 162, (4th Cir. 1985); Andrews v. Fitzgerald, 823 F. Supp. 356, 379-80 (M.D.N.C. 1993).

State v. . Powell

168 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1914

In S. v. David, 49 N. … Simmons v. Davenport, 140 N. C., 407 ; S. v. Yellowday, 152 N. C., 793 .

Taylor v. Collins

128 N.C. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1997

(Henson & Fuerst), filed suit against Taylor for divorce from bed and board, alimony and equitable distribution. … Turner v. Duke University, 325 N.C. 152, 165 , 381 S.E.2d 706, 714 (1989)). This standard is intended to give considerable leeway to the trial court in the imposition of sanctions under Rule 11. Brown v. Brown, 112 N.C.

Hagerman v. Union Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment

811 S.E.2d 242 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 2018

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. Browning

230 N.C. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2013

JPMorgan Chase Bank (“Plaintiff’) appeals from a 26 October 2012 order granting summary judgment in favor of Linda Browning and Leslie Browning (collectively “Defendants”). … Browning, Unmarried, Linda D. Browning, Unmarried, and Leslie D. Browning Davis, Unmarried.” There is also a title insurance fee of $405.50 and a title exam fee of $185.00 listed on the “Title Commitment” document.

North Carolina Automotive Trade Ass'n v. Doughton

192 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 27, 1926

In Parker v. Bank, 152 N. … Blake v. Askew, 76 N. C., 325 ; Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 567 ; Kistler v. R. R., 164 N. C., 365 ; Burton v. Realty Co., 188 N. C., 473 . Appeal dismissed.

Patton v. State of North Carolina

256 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 20, 1966

Brown, supra at 507 , 73 S.Ct. at 446 . In Townsend v. … As stated by Justice Jackson, concurring in Brown v.

State v. . Covington

117 N.C. 834 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

Cited: S. v. Gadberry, ante , 822; S. v. Thomas , 118 N.C. 1119 ; S. v. Dowden, ib. , 1153; S. v. Locklear, ib. , 1159; S. v. Freeman , 122 N.C. 1017 ; S. v. Booker , 123 N.C. 721 , 726 ; S. v. … Rhyne , 124 N.C. 858 ; S. v. Smith , 125 N.C. 621 ; S. v. Bishop , 131 N.C. 761 ; S. v. Cole , 132 N.C. 1074 ; S. v. Daniels , 134 N.C. 676 ; S. v. Hunt, ib. , 688; S. v. Lipscomb, ib. , 693; S. v.

Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty Insurance

198 N.C. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2009

MARTINI, Plaintiff, v. COMPANION PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. COA08-1127. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 7, 2009. *157 Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., by R. Scott Brown and W. … Gen.Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 52 (2007); Federal Paper Board Co., 101 N.C.App. at 333 , 399 S.E.2d at 414 ; see also Craddock v.

Pike v. D.A. Fiore Construction Services, Inc.

201 N.C. App. 406 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2009

Id. at 403-04, 436 S.E.2d at 148 (citing Brown v. Texas Co., 237 N.C. 738 , 76 S.E.2d 45 (1953)). … Langley v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 92 N.C. App. 327, 329 , 374 S.E.2d 443, 445 (1988) (citing Wellmon v. Hickory Constr. Co., 88 N.C.

Curtis v. Barnet

2011 NCBC 24 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 22, 2011

Curtis v. Barnet, 2011 NCBC 24. … BROWNING, ANN MAYNARD GRAY, ORDER & OPINION JAMES H. HANCE, JR., JAMES T. RHODES, and JAMES E.

Southern Railway Co. v. City of Winston-Salem

4 N.C. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1969

R. v. Board of Utility Commissioners, supra ( 254 U.S. 394 , 65 L. ed. 322). … Charlotte, 242 N.C. 670 , 89 S.E. 2d 406 ; Cox v. Brown, 218 N.C. 350 , 11 S.E. 2d 152 ; State v. Sasseen, 206 N.C. 644 , 175 S.E. 142 ; State v. Stallings, 189 N.C. 104 , 126 S.E. 187 .

Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. Board of Education , 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E.2d 335 (1967); Greene v. Board of Education , 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E.2d 129 (1953). 2. Defendant's named employee, Ethel M. … Greene v. Board of Education , supra . As the Court of Appeals stated in Slade vs. New Hanover Board of Education , 10 N.C.

Waldrop v. Hodges

230 N.C. 370 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1949

Johnson v. Winslow, supra; Pearsall v. Kenan, 79 N.C. 472 ; Tucker v. Baker, 94 N.C. 162 ; Vanderbilt v. R. … Atkins v. McAden, supra.

State v. Lester

70 N.C. App. 757 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1984

Defendant, citing State v. Ricks, 34 N.C. … State v. Ricks is clearly distinguishable on its facts from the instant case, but we find State v.

Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. Board of Education , 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E.2d 335 (1967); Greene v. Board of Education , 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E.2d 129 (1953). 2. Defendant's named employee, Ethel M. … Greene v. Board of Education , supra . As the Court of Appeals stated in Slade vs. New Hanover Board of Education , 10 N.C.

Parker v. QUINN-McGOWEN COMPANY

262 N.C. 560 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1964

R., supra; Floyd v. R. R., 167 N.C. 55 , 83 S.E. 12 ; Kyles v. R. R., supra; (2) unauthorized autopsies, Gurganious v. Simpson, 213 N.C. 613 , 197 S.E. 163 ; Stephenson v. … In Hale v. Brown, 84 Ariz. 61 , 323 P. 2d 955 , the plaintiff’s only grievance was that the body of her husband had been embalmed without her express permission prior to the autopsy.

Panzino v. 5 Church, Inc.

2020 NCBC 13 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 12, 2020

See, e.g., Azure Dolphin, LLC v. Barton, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 90, at *23–24 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 2, 2017), aff’d, 371 N.C. 579, 821 S.E.2d 711 (2018) (citing examples); Brown v. Secor, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 65, at *18–19 (N.C. … Gusinsky v. Flanders Corp., 2013 NCBC LEXIS 43, at *11 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 25, 2013); see also Estate of Browne v. Thompson, 219 N.C. App. 637, 641, 727 S.E.2d 573, 576 (2012). 17.

State v. . Casey

201 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1931

Brown v. Sheets , 197 N.C. 268 , 148 S.E. 233 ; Brown v. Hillsboro , 185 N.C. 368 , 117 S.E. 41 ; Johnson v. R. R. , 163 N.C. 431 , 79 S.E. 690 . … Brown v. Sheets, supra; Brown v. Hillsboro, supra; Alexander v. Cedar Works, supra; Mottu v. Davis, supra; Simmons v. Mann, supra; Carson v. Ins. Co. , 165 N.C. 135 , 80 S.E. 1080 ; Warwick v.