Case law

Brown v. Hennessey State Bank

78 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1920

The exact- question was presented and decided by this court in the case of Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. … Chief Justice Owen in the case of Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, supra. Counsel further contend that this holding is contrary to the case of Iowa Loan and Trust Co. v.

Brown v. Territory of Oklahoma

15 Okla. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1905

At the succeeding term of court an indictment was returned against Brown charging him with the crime, of perjury. … It was held in Sproat v.

Evans v. Brown Et Ux.

33 Okla. 323 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1912

Hunter Realty Co. et al. v. Spencer et al., 21 Okla. 155 , 95 Pac. 757 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 622; Ferguson v. Gooch, 94 Va. 1 , 26 S. E. 397 , 40 L. R. A. 234; Conkey v. Bond, 36 N. Y. 427 ; Davis v. … Rep. 541 ; Henderson et al. v. Vin *328 cent, 84 Ala. 99 , 4 South. 180 . In Hunter Realty Co. et al. v.

United States v. Brown

4 F.2d 270 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1925

Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636 , 26 L. Ed. 875 ; Leo v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48 , 6 S. Ct. 249 , 29 L. Ed. 570 ; Howe v. Parker, 190 F. 738 , 111 C. C. A. 406 ; Dixon v. Cox (C. C. A.) 268 F. 285 . … The eases cited are Pettibone v. U. S., 148 U. S. 197 , 13 S. Ct. 542 , 37 L. Ed. 419 ; U. S. v. Rabinowich, 238 17. S. 78, 35 S. Ct. 682 , 59 L. Ed. 1211 ; and U. S. v. Stevenson, 215 U. S. 190 , 30 S. Ct. 35 , 54 L.

United States v. Brown

15 F.2d 565 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1926

A.) 282 F. 93 ; Chisholm v. Creek & Ind. Dev. Co. (D. C.) 273 F. 589 ; Midland Oil Co. v. Turner, 179 F. 74 , 102 C. C. A. 386 ; Goodrum v. Buffalo, 162 F. 817 , 89 C. C. A. 525 ; Tidal Oil Co. v. … Jennings v. Wood, 192 F. 507 , 112 C. C. A. 657 .

BROWN v. STATE

2018 OK CR 3 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2018

BROWN v. STATE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us e-payments Careers Home Courts Decisions Programs News Legal Research Court Records Quick Links OSCN Found Document:BROWN v. … STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only BROWN v. STATE 2018 OK CR 3 Case Number: D-2014-705 Decided: 02/15/2018 FABION DEMARGIO BROWN, Appellant, v.

Bankers Trust Co. v. Brown

76 O.B.A.J. 381 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2004

Brown, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her counterclaims against Bankers Trust Compány, and her cross-claims against Saxon Mortgage, Inc. (collectively, Lenders). … Silver v.

Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Brown

38 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 1913

Tovera v. Parker, 34 Okla. 74 , 128 Pac. 101 ; Horton v. Birdsong, 35 Okla. 275 , 129 Pac. 701 . In Lyons v. Stills, 97 Tenn. 514 , 37 S.

Board of Com'rs v. State Board of Equalization

155 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

CLARK, V. O. J. … In the case of City State Bank of Oklahoma City v.

Brown Investment Company v. Hickox

369 P.2d 807 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1962

referring this issue to the trial court as was done in Jones v. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur.

Galt-Brown Co. v. Lay

183 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1938

Lay, damages against the plaintiffs in error, the Galt-Brown Company, a foreign corporation, and Harry J. … Shobe v. Sykes, 169 Okla. 491 , 37 P.2d 908 ; Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Stewart et al., 172 Okla. 143 , 45 P.2d 121 .

BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.

391 P.3d 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 2017

Dept. of Public Safety v. … TWA v.

BROWN v. MULDROW PUBLIC SCHOOLS

2024 OK CIV APP 20 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 2024

BROWN v. … After filing the requisite Notice of Tort Claim to the Muldrow Board of Education on September 19, 2017, Brown filed suit against the School District and teacher, Julie Boshers, in her individual capacity on June 19, 2018

Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

v. … Kurn, 189 Okl. 203 , 115 P.2d 113, 115 , and Williams v.

City of Duncan v. Brown

69 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Lynn v. Jacksoon, 26 Okla. 852 , 110 Pac. 727 ; Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist Church, 27 Okla. 473 , 112 Pac. 1127 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 659; Reynolds v. Hill, 28 Okla. 533 , 114 Pac. 1108 ; Seaver v. … In the City of Woodward v.

Brown v. Sirmons

415 F. Supp. 2d 1268 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2006

See Charm v. State, 1996 OK CR 40, 60 , 924 P.2d 754, 770 . Brown, 989 P.2d at 933-34 . … See Brown v. Sanders, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 884 , 163 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006).

Board of Education v. Board of Logan County

155 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1932

This is an original action in mandamus brought in this court by the board of education oi^ school district No. 60, Logan county, against the county excise board of that county, and others, seeking to compel the excise board … Board of Education, School Dist. No. 16, v. Excise Board Payne Co., No. 23153, decided Jan. 26, 1932, 155 Okla. 227 , 7 P. (2d) 473 .

Brown v. Triangle Motor Co.

187 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1940

The authorities cited in the brief reasonably sustain the allegations of error, and as stated in Osborne v. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, GIBSON, HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Brown v. United States

442 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1977

By way of Motion pursuant to Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code the above named petitioner, Mark Brown, III, seeks to vacate his sentence. … Wagenknecht v. Crouse, 344 F.2d 920 (CA10 1965) and United States v. Smith, 407 F.2d 33 (CA2 1969). As pointed out by the court in Taylor v.

Kelly Et Ux. v. Brown

55 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

Brown. Third, that defendants did borrow and receive from Charles Bryan about the sum of $260, and that ■ Charles Bryan, without the knowledge or consent of defendants, made the note and mortgage payable to E. M. … Co. v. Calhoun, 18 Okla. 75 , 89 Pac. 207 , 11 Ann. Cas. 681 this court says: “A verdict will not be reviewed as to the facts on appeal, if there is sufficient evidence to support it.”