Case law

Seibert v. City of Columbia

461 S.W.2d 808 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1970

Three cases are cited in support of that doctrine, i. e., Powell v. City of Joplin, supra, Drainage Dist. No. 1 Reformed of Stoddard County v. Matthews, 361 Mo. 286 , 234 S.W.2d 567 , and Hixson v. … Brown v. Bibb, 356 Mo. 148 , 201 S.W.2d 370, 374 .

Murphy v. SS Kresge Co.

239 S.W.2d 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1951

Was it right in the middle of a board or where two boards are joined together? A. … Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company, 99 Mo. 310, 318, 319 , 12 S.W. 655 , 656. See also Kennedy v. St. Louis Transit Co., 103 Mo.App. 1, 6, 7 , 78 S.W. 77, 78 .

Whittemore v. Sills

76 Mo. App. 248 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1898

Collier v. Swinney, 16 Mo. 484 ; Taylor v. Steamboat, 20 Mo. 261 ; Davis v. Smith, 15 Mo. 467 . … The ordinance providing for the work refers to plans and specifications, as a part thereof, on file in the board of public works. This may be done. Galbreath v. Newton, 30 Mo. App. 380 .

State v. Rotter

193 Mo. App. 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1916

The case of State v. Schnettler, 181 Mo. 173, 185, 186 , 79 S. … [See State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192 , 79 S. W. 1111 .]

State v. Camden

837 S.W.2d 520 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1992

Camden relies on such cases as State v. Brown, 683 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.1984). … In State v.

Oliphant v. Ries

568 S.W.3d 336 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 2019

Maddox v. Grauman, 265 S.W.2d 939 , 941 (Ky. 1954). Dr. … LaFleur v. Shoney's, Inc., 83 S.W.3d 474 , 478 (Ky. 2002).

Owsley v. Owsley

693 S.W.2d 897 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1985

See also Huber v. Huber, supra, 649 S.W.2d at 958 . That was not done here. There was only the order set forth above. The recitation of legal conclusions in a commitment order are not sufficient. Brown v. … See Brown v. Brown, 670 S.W.2d 167, 170-171 (Mo.App.1984); Huber v. Huber, supra, 649 S.W.2d at 958 . Although we are remanding, for future guidance we discuss appellant’s third point. There is no merit in it.

Winston v. REORGANIZED SCH. DIST. R-2, ETC.

636 S.W.2d 324 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 2, 1982

Crane v. Riehn, 568 S.W.2d 525, 528-29 (Mo. banc 1978); GEM Stores, Inc. v. O’Brien, 374 S.W.2d 109, 117 (Mo. banc 1963); Stanhope, supra 280 N.W.2d at 719 ; Brown v. … Even so, compare Brown v. Wichita State University, supra, and Frazier v. Alum Crest, supra.

State v. Sanders

522 S.W.3d 212 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 2017

Hill and Zonia Brown. Ms. Brown told police Mr. Sanders and Ms. Hill were involved in a violent fight at the motel. The police arrested and questioned Mr. Sanders. Mr. … Brown testified she and Ms. Hill agreed to have sex with Mr. Sanders in exchange for crack cocaine. An argument ensued when Mr. Sanders provided what Ms. Brown and Ms.

E. L. Martin & Co. v. Johnson

23 Mo. App. 96 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1886

The evidence showed that the property in question consisted of a counter and work bench, two side boards, one good ice chest, and one old ice chest. … Hattaway v. Brown, 22 Minn. 214 ; McFarlane v. Fouke et al., 1 Watts & Serg. 297; Baldwin v. Tuttle, 23 Ia. 72 .

Pennington v. Stanton

125 Mo. 658 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1894

containing about ninety-one acres, to the defendant, William Stanton, party of the second part, for the following consideration and agreement expressed in said deed, to wit: “In consideration of the sum of $1 and the care, board … Brown, who had known her from her youth up, said that he never .thought her really capable of doing business, and, upon being immediately asked what was the matter with her, proceeded to describe her physical condition.

Brady v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

233 S.W.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

233 S.W.2d 841 (1950) BRADY v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE CO. No. 41909. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2. November 13, 1950. *842 Thompson, Mitchell, Thompson & Douglas, James P. Brown, St. Louis, for appellant. … United States, 8 Cir., 237 F. 513, 520 [8]; Brown v.

Tyra v. Delta Veterinary Clinic, Inc.

687 S.W.2d 931 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1985

Brown was in the storage building and claimant was in the trailer, handing the bags to Brown who was stacking them inside. … As observed in Blew v.

Three Rivers Junior College District of Poplar Bluff v. Statler

421 S.W.2d 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1967

Heimberger v. Board of Curators, 268 Mo. 598 , 188 S.W. 128, 131, 133 ; Todd v. Reynolds, (Mo.Sup.) 199 S.W. 173 , 175; City of Maryville v. Cushman, 363 Mo. 87 , 249 S.W.2d 347, 350 . … Brown, banc, 244 Mo. 271 , 149 S.W. 644, 645-646 .

Shelby v. Shelby

130 S.W.3d 674 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2004

Browne-Barnum, as a rebuttal witness. … Browne-Barnum made of father. Dr. Browne-Barnum had not been designated as an expert witness to be called at trial. Wife subpoenaed, obtained, and used Dr. Browne-Barnum’s records for use in cross-examining Dr. Clark.

State v. Swearingin

564 S.W.2d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1978

The doctrine of collateral estoppel, as it pertains to criminal cases, was discussed at length by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Com. v. Brown, 375 A.2d 331 (Pa. 1977). … State v. Recke, 311 Mo. 581 , 278 S.W. 995, 1000 ; State v. Brown, 360 Mo. 104 , 227 S.W.2d 646, 653 .

Folk v. City of St. Louis

250 Mo. 116 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913

[Roanoke v. Berkowitz, 80 Va. 616 , l. c. 623; State ex rel. v. Board of Liquidators, 28 La. Ann. 121 ; City of Mount Vernon v. State ex rel., 71 Ohio St. 428 .] … [Lucas v. Brown, 127 Mo. App. 645 , l. c. 653.]

Sneathen v. Sneathen

104 Mo. 201 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Burke v. Adams, 80 Mo. 506 ; Standiford v. Standiford, 97 Mo. 231 ; Tiedeman on Real Prop., sec. 814. … Tobin v. Bass, 85 Mo. 654 ; Standiford v. Standiford, supra; Tiedeman on Real Prop., sec. 814. *211 There is nothing in the cases of Huey v. Huey, 65 Mo. 689 , and Hammerslough v.

Castilo v. State Highway Commission

312 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1925

Thus in Brown v. … [Brown v. Patterson, 224 Mo. l. c. 658, supra; Reagan v. County Court, 226 Mo. l. c. 89, supra.]

State v. Roper

268 S.W.3d 392 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2008

The court found Roper indigent and ordered Brown to represent him. Three months later, Brown filed a motion to withdraw at Roper’s request. … Brown, away from me. I don’t want her anywhere near me.”