Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.56s
657 F.3d 591 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 16, 2011
The remaining subject is whether chaplain Sutton has qualified immunity, which comprises two questions: first whether the plaintiff has a good constitutional claim, and second whether the right in question was “clearly established … Immunity protects public employees who make reasonable errors in applying even clearly established law. See, e.g., Malley v.
Cited 246 timesPublished852 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 6, 1994
Thus, if the applicable law was not clearly established, or if the law was clearly established and Defendant James did not violate that law in terminating Plaintiff, he is entitled to qualified immunity. … CONCLUSION Defendant James is entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate clearly established law in terminating Plaintiff.
Cited 11 timesPublished490 F.3d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 2007
A defendant will be entitled to qualified immunity if either (1) his actions did not violate clearly established law or (2) it was objectively reasonable for him to believe that his actions did not violate clearly established … clearly established law.”
Reversed on other grounds by Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)Cited 595 timesPublished884 F.3d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 8, 2018
They all raised a qualified-immunity defense, arguing that they did not violate any clearly established constitutional right. … To decide whether Gray is entitled to qualified immunity, this court must ask: (1) whether his conduct violated Koster's Fourth Amendment right; and (2) whether the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged
Cited 24 timesPublished172 F. Supp. 3d 1039 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 23, 2016
Qualified immunity “protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … In support of his argument for qualified immunity, Puente cites Gause v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedGeorge MacKie v. Katrin Rouse-Weir / George MacKie v. Robert Joss
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 24, 2025
Second, both legal precedent and the statutory framework of c. 123A establish that the role of qualified examiners is not only essential, but quasi judicial. … established statutory or constitutional right for the purpose of determining whether qualified immunity applied. [13] In his complaint, Mackie alleged that Joss "was hired by the [DOC] as a [qualified examiner] and assigned
Cited 0 timesPublished907 F. Supp. 1088 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Nov 5, 1995
Alternatively, Defendants contend that they should prevail as a matter of law even if they are entitled only to qualified immunity for their acts, because those acts did not violate any “clearly established rights” of the … The Court reiterated that qualified immunity rests upon “objective legal reasonableness,” and stated that allegedly unlawful official action must be “assessed in light of the legal rules that were ‘clearly established’ at
Cited 3 timesPublished922 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 28, 1991
Absent from the order was any discussion of what the clearly established law was at the time of Howell's death, an inquiry essential to a determination of immunity. … Generally Applicable Law 16 As stated above, Harlow established the test for qualified immunity.
Vacated on other grounds by Howell v. Evans, 931 F.2d 711 (1991)Cited 33 timesPublished710 F. Supp. 2d 408 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 2010
Once we determine whether the right at issue was clearly established for the particular context that the officer faced, the qualified immunity inquiry is complete. … Pinter’s Right Was Clearly Established “For a constitutional right to be ‘clearly established’ for purposes of determining whether an officer is entitled to qualified immunity, the ‘contours of the right must be sufficiently
Reversed on other grounds by Pinter v. City of New York, 448 F. App'x 99 (2011)Cited 3 timesPublished526 F.3d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 6, 2008
Discussion Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability for civil damages for torts committed while performing discretionary duties unless their conduct violates a clearly established statutory … We turn now to the second inquiry in the qualified immunity analysis, whether the right to be free from excessive force was clearly established. B.
Cited 394 timesPublished869 F.3d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 2017
Finding that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to Lam, demonstrated a constitutional violation of clearly established law, the district court denied Officer West’s motion based on qualified immunity.2 Officer … demonstrated a violation of clearly established law.”
Cited 57 timesPublished73 F.4th 376 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 14, 2023
of clearly established law.” … Qualified immunity provides government officials with immunity from suit “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known
Cited 10 timesPublished919 F.2d 1531 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 27, 1990
The qualified immunity shield protects government officials performing discretionary functions from civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … The district court’s order denies summary judgment on qualified immunity as follows: Qualified Immunity.
Cited 85 timesPublished593 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 2010
For qualified immunity purposes, however, we must more precisely define the rights at issue, and only then determine whether they were “clearly established.” … For qualified immunity purposes, however, there is a separate question, which is whether the right violated by this conduct was clearly established.
Cited 270 timesPublishedWright v. Department of Children and Family Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 2, 2024
Bank Clothiers, Inc., 761 F.3d 732, 734–35 (7th Cir. 2014) 5 Defendants again assert that qualified immunity precludes Wright from proceeding on his § 1983 claim. … LeVan, 967 F.3d 584, 590 (7th Cir. 2020) (qualified immunity applies if the “well-pleaded allegations, taken as true, do not state a claim of violation of clearly established law”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown753 F.3d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2014
On this score, appellees are entitled to qualified immunity. Whatever rights appellants had to receive exculpatory evidence prior to entering their pleas was not clearly established. … in light of the clearly established constitutional rights.' ” Feathers v.
Cited 568 timesPublishedWilliam Evans, Jr. v. Brian Krook
106 F.4th 790 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 3, 2024
Krook moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. … In this interlocutory appeal, Krook challenges the order denying qualified immunity.
Cited 2 timesPublishedF. Buddie Contracting, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Community College District
31 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 21, 1998
Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions “from liability or civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … Thus, it is clear that the existence of an authorizing state law does not alter the qualified immunity analysis.
Cited 1 timesPublished453 F. Supp. 2d 874 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2006
Qualified Immunity i. … If a court concludes that an officer’s conduct did violate a clearly established constitutional right, then it must deny him the protection afforded by qualified immunity.” Id.
Cited 26 timesPublished750 So. 2d 674 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 22, 1999
There, the court held that the failure to loosen tight handcuffs did not rise to the level of a clearly established constitutional violation. … Dowling's version of the facts, if proven, would overcome the defense of qualified immunity. See Redo v. Sylvestri, 690 So.2d 731 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna