Case law

DOE a v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. Louis County

637 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1986

Watters, Brown, James & Rabbitt, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Cerny. MEMORANDUM NANGLE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on separate motions to dismiss filed by the defendants Special School District of St. … Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F.2d 1205, 1238 (7th Cir.1984); Mattis v. Schnarr, 502 F.2d 588 (8th Cir.1974); see also Trujillo v. Board of County Commissioners, 768 F.2d 1186 (10th Cir.1985); Kelson v.

Owen v. City of Branson

305 S.W.2d 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1957

First National Bank of Cape Girardeau v. Lufcy, 329 Mo. 1224 , 49 S.W.2d 8, 14 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Broaddus, 216 Mo. 336 , 115 S.W. 1018, 1020 . … See Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., Mo., 287 S.

State Ex Rel. Tompkins v. Shipman

290 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921

We are cited to Trust Co. v. Schramm, 269 Mo. 489 ; Wire Co. v. Wollbrinck, 275 Mo. l. c. 357; Bond & Ins. Co. v. Chorn, 274 Mo. l. c. 29; Amer. Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 270 Mo. 40 . … The Schramm case simply rules that where the State Board of Equalization has fixed the value of property for taxation, the county or city boards have no power to increase such valuation.

Luetkemeyer v. Kaufmann

364 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 1973

Child Benefit Theory Plaintiffs place great reliance on the “child benefit theory” spelled out in Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1946); Board of Education v. … Board of Education, supra, and Board of Education v. Allen, supra. The Court’s discussion of those cases in Lemon v.

Woodson v. City of Kansas City

158 S.W.3d 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

Robert Woodson appeals from the Kansas City, Missouri, Property Maintenance Appeals Board’s determination that conditions on two of his properties violated the Nuisance and Property Maintenance Codes. … Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the Board’s order.

State of Missouri v. Percy Burnett

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2016

' Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). … In State v.

Field v. Natl. City Bank of St. Louis

343 Mo. 419 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1938

elected Anderson to fill the vacancy on the board and as president. … We further note that plaintiff's Instruction No. 3 authorizing the jury to disregard the release seems to have the same defect as those criticized in Brown v. Worthington, 162 Mo. App. 508 , 142 S.W. 1082 , and Link v.

State ex rel. Schmoll v. Drabelle

261 Mo. 515 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 24, 1914

[Rex v. Arundel, 80 Eng. Rep. (full reprint) 258; Edinburgh Ry. Co. v. Wauchope, 8 Cl. & F. 710; Lon. and Can. L. & A. Co. v. R. M. of Morris, 7 Manitoba, 128.]” … [State v. Frank, 60 Neb. 327 .]

Stewart v. BD. OF ED. OF RITENOUR, ETC.

630 S.W.2d 130 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1982

The Board contends that Stewart failed to use reasonable diligence to secure similar employment. In Wolf v. … In Ryan v.

State v. Owens

486 S.W.2d 462 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972

In State v. … State v. Phillips, Mo., 299 S.W.2d 431 ; State v. Sykes, Mo., 436 S.W.2d 32 ; State v. Stancliff, Mo., 467 S.W.2d 26 .

State v. Releford

750 S.W.2d 539 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1988

Brown? Venireman Brown: That’s correct. Mr. Komoroski: Yes, sir. Venireman Brown: I am one of the chaplains at the Jackson County Jail. Mr. Komoroski: So you, in fact, know Mr. Releford? Venireman Brown: Not personally. … See State v. Guinan, 732 S.W.2d 174, 177 (Mo.1987) (en banc). (Reverend Brown was later stricken for cause.) No abuse of discretion occurred.

Cossitt v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

224 Mo. 97 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1909

[Turner v. Railroad, 51 Mo. 501 ; Meyer v. Chambers, 68 Mo. 626 ; Olmstead v. Smith, 87 Mo. 602 .] … In Brown v.

Federal Reserve Bank v. Millspaugh

314 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1926

Bank v. Brightwell, 148 Mo. 358 ; First Natl. Bank v. Sanford, 62 Mo. App. 394 ; Harrison v. Smith, 83 Mo. *11 210; Federal Reserve Bank v. Bohannan, 127 S. E. … Bank v. First Natl. Bank, 187 S. W. (Ark.) l. c. 674 and cases; Brown v. Sheldon State Bank, 139 Iowa, 83 ; Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Peters, 123 S. E. (Va.) 379.] III.

Pallme v. Rott

440 S.W.2d 184 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1969

Civil Rule 74.04, supra; Cooper v. Finke, Mo., 376 S.W.2d 225 ; Brown v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, Mo.App., 375 S.W.2d 623 . … Those interested in cases calling for a proper application of that doctrine may refer to Eilers v. Alewel, Mo., 393 S.W.2d 584, 1 .c. 590; and Mathews Real Estate Co. v.

State ex rel. Walsh v. Platte County

165 S.W.3d 194 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2005

Walsh appeals the judgment of the Platte County Circuit Court affirming the decision of the Platte County Board of Zoning Adjustment granting a non-use variance to his neighbors, Aaron and Jennafer Cross. … We find that the Board did not act illegally and there was sufficient evidence to support the decision, so we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Worthon

585 S.W.2d 143 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1979

He went to the front and tried to pull the assailant from Brown. Moorehead couldn’t, but when the assailant got Brown’s billfold he turned Brown loose. Moorehead knew the assailant. … State v. Wiley, 522 S.W.2d 281 (Mo. banc 1975); State v. Pruitt, supra, at 788; State v. Novak, 428 S.W.2d 585 (Mo.1968).

Koen v. Long

302 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 1969

The defendants, Long, Harrison, Walsh, Gates, Cervantes, Sanders and Rogers, constitute the past and present Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. … of action is dismissed as to defendant, the Honorable Richard Brown, at plaintiffs' costs.

Turner Looker Co. v. Hindman

298 Mo. 61 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1923

[Dobbins v. Edmonds, 18 Mo. App. 307 ; Crown Vinegar Spice Co. v. Wehrs, 59 Mo. App. 493 ; St. Louis Range Co. v. Kline-Drummond Merc. Co., 120 Mo. App. 438 ; Black River Lbr. Co. v. Warner, 93 Mo. 374 , 386; Oehler v. … Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., not sitting.

Vanguard Packaging, Inc. v. Midland Bank

871 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1994

In support of this position, Plaintiff cites the Court to the 1912 ease of Brown v. Worthington, 162 Mo.App. 508 , 142 S.W. 1082 (1912). … Defendant, at all relevant times, was the chairman of the board and a member of the loan committee at Midland Bank.

Murphy v. SS Kresge Co.

239 S.W.2d 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1951

Was it right in the middle of a board or where two boards are joined together? A. … Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company, 99 Mo. 310, 318, 319 , 12 S.W. 655 , 656. See also Kennedy v. St. Louis Transit Co., 103 Mo.App. 1, 6, 7 , 78 S.W. 77, 78 .