Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.67s
Schamel v. St. Louis Arena Corporation
324 S.W.2d 375 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1959
brown shirt. … In Hughes v. St.
Cited 15 timesPublishedPolavarapu v. General Motors Corp.
897 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1995
Wes Norton, Employer’s board certified industrial hygienist, also testified. … Bradshaw v. Brown Shoe Co., 660 S.W.2d 390 (Mo.App.1983). In a letter to Employer’s attorney dated April 18, 1990, more than two years prior to the hearing, Dr.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCitizens Bank of Edina v. West Quincy Auto Auction, Inc.
742 S.W.2d 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 15, 1987
Brown was not present at the sale which was conducted by his son and law partner, David Brown. The bank bid in the property and thereafter Tom B. Brown executed a trustee’s deed of the realty to the bank. … Brown, trustee, conducted the sale. David Brown, as notary public, notarized the deed. The bank brought suit for possession of the property and damages.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGriffin v. Evans Electrical Construction Co.
529 S.W.2d 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1975
The function of the court is to determine whether the Commission’s findings, if supported by competent and substantial evidence, are contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. * * * ” See also: Brown v. … In the case of Wigham v.
Cited 10 timesPublished208 S.W.3d 291 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2006
See State v. Bradley, 57 S.W.3d 335, 339 (Mo.App. S.D.2001) and State v. Collis, 849 S.W.2d 660, 665 (Mo.App. W.D.1993). … Hancock v. Shook, 100 S.W.3d 786, 795 (Mo. banc 2003). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing L.C.’s rebuttal testimony. Mr. Brown and Ms.
Cited 5 timesPublished145 S.W.3d 912 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2004
State v. Brown, 97 S.W.3d 97, 101 (Mo.App. W.D.2002); Boyd v. State, 86 S.W.3d 153, 159 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). … State v. Brown, 958 S.W.2d 574, 580 (Mo.App. W.D.1997).
Cited 14 timesPublished375 S.W.2d 40 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1964
See State v. Woolsey, Mo.Sup., 328 S.W.2d 24 ; State v. Reagan, Mo.Sup., 328 S.W.2d 26 ; State v. Davenport, Mo.Sup., 360 S.W.2d 710 . … See State v. Martin, Mo.Sup., 347 S.W.2d 680, 682 ; State v. Cusumano, Mo., 372 S.W.2d 860, 866 , and cases cited.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSTATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. THOMAS NATHANIEL TURRENTINE
524 S.W.3d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2016
Id. at 267 n.4. 5 The State also relies on State v. Brown, 457 S.W.3d 772, 783 (Mo.App. 2014), State v. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished63 Mo. App. 431 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1895
Lippold v. Held, 58 Mo. 213 ; Thornton v. Irwin, 43 Mo. 153 ; McDonald v. Hulse, 16 *439 Mo. 503; Ralston v. Wood, 15 Ill. 171 ; Flower v. Ellwood, 66 Ill. 439 . … Iowa Co. v. Foster, 49 Iowa, 676 ; Hardin v. Bauer, 25 Iowa, 364; Sloan v. Rice, 41 Iowa, 465 ; Taft v. Boyd, 13 Allen, 84 ; Hawkes v. Ins. Co., 11 Wis. 188 ; Ralston v. Wood, 15 Ill. 158 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedState of Missouri v. Timothy Wolf
Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2020
State v. Paden, 533 S.W.3d 731, 738 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); State v. Onate, 398 S.W.3d 102, 106 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013)(citing Brown v. … Fite v. Johnson, 530 S.W.3d 508, 510 (Mo. banc 2017) (citing Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 730 n.5) (“Rule 29.07(d) does not apply to claims enumerated within Rule 24.035.”).
Cited 0 timesPublished190 Mo. 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1905
Brown. That he died on the thirty-first day of December, 1877, intestate, seized of the land, and that he left as his heirs at law his children, Newton A. Brown, Daniel E. Brown, Henry B. … Brown, the common source of title, died intestate, December 31, 1877, leaving surviving him his widow, Mary A. Brown, and appellant, and other heirs at law.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSTATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JERRY RAY GILLUM
574 S.W.3d 766 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2019
State v. Kopp, 325 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Mo. App. S.D. 2010) (quoting State v. Breese, 250 S.W.3d 413, 420 (Mo. App. S.D. 2008)). … Both Deputy Pratt and Sarah Brown, a criminalist with the Drug Chemistry Section of the Missouri State Highway Patrol Crime Lab (“criminalist Brown”), testified that a small amount of liquid substance or residue was visible
Cited 5 timesPublished193 Mo. 615 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1906
Clark v. … Brown v. Klein, 116 Mo. l. c. 268, this court, through Sherwood, J., declares that “a contest is pending from the time the notice is served on the con■testee,” and in Gumm v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedCleveland Village School District No. 118 v. Zion
195 Mo. App. 299 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1916
[Rice v. McClelland, 58 Mo. 116 ; School Dist. v. Sims, 186 S. W. 4 ; District 6 v. District 5 of Henry county, 18 Mo. App. 266 .] … [Abler v. School District of St. Joseph, 141 Mo. App. 189, 197 .]. As said in District v. District, 18 Mo.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Tompkins v. Shipman
290 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921
We are cited to Trust Co. v. Schramm, 269 Mo. 489 ; Wire Co. v. Wollbrinck, 275 Mo. l. c. 357; Bond & Ins. Co. v. Chorn, 274 Mo. l. c. 29; Amer. Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 270 Mo. 40 . … The Schramm case simply rules that where the State Board of Equalization has fixed the value of property for taxation, the county or city boards have no power to increase such valuation.
Cited 10 timesPublished341 S.W.2d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1960
Pitts v. Garner, Mo.Sup., 321 S.W.2d 509 ; Nydegger v. Mason, Mo.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 816 . … Motor Vehicles § 317, pp. 733, 735, Faught v. Washam, supra; Pitt v. Garner, supra. Both Brown and Crisp testified they did not apprehend danger until the approximate moment the Ford skidded into the south lane.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUniversal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. South Side Bank
224 Mo. App. 876 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1930
[Buckley v. Bank, 35 N.J. Law, 400, 10 Am. Rep. 249 ; Farmer v. Bank, 100 Tenn. 187 , 47 S.W. 234 ; Knoxville Water Co. v. Bank. 123 Tenn. 364 , 131 S.W. 447 ; Talbot v. Bank, 1 Hill (N.Y.) 295; Johnson v. … Bank, 6 Hun (N.Y.) 124; Graves v. Bank, 17 N.Y. 205 ; Indiana National Bank v. Holtsclaw, 98 Ind. 85 ; Shaffer v. McKee, 19 Ohio St. 526 ; Cement Co. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished87 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2002
Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 723 (Mo. banc 2002). … Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 727 ; see also Logan v. State, 22 S.W.3d 783, 784 (Mo.App.2000).
Cited 2 timesPublishedMissouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2024
Church, 543 S.W.3d at 34 (quoting Mann v. Mann, 239 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Mo. App. 1951)). “Instead, we must view the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the zoning board.” Lynch v. … State v. Clark, 503 S.W.3d 235, 237 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublished252 Mo. 102 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1913
[Brown v. Schleier, 194 U. S. 18 ; People ex rel. Elec. Co. v. Barker, 141 N. Y. 251 ; Carr v. Rochester Turn. Co., 207 Pa. St. 392; Stockton v. Am. Tob. Co., 55 N. J. Eq. 352; Miller v. Am. Tob. Co., 56 N. … Brown, P. J., and Paris, J., concur.
Cited 27 timesPublished
Ask Donna