Case law

Gateway Chemical Co. v. Groves

370 S.W.2d 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1963

Quotations from Hendricks v. … “Whether a case be one depending upon res ipsa loquitur or upon a charge of specific negligence, it is equally true that no case is made where the existence of negligence is left wholly to conjecture, * * Brown v. St.

State v. Blevins

425 S.W.2d 155 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1968

Moore then removed the coat and it was taken by Eddie Brown, who was facing him. Blevins and Brown then left. … State v. Crawford, 60 Utah 6 , 206 P. 717 ; People v. Braun, 14 Cal.2d 1 , 92 P.2d 402 .

Markovich v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

266 S.W.2d 641 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

Defendant cites Hamilton v. Patton Creamery Co., 359 Mo. 526 , 222 S.W.2d 713, 717 [8, 12]; Murphy v. S. S. Kresge Co., Mo.App., 205 S.W.2d 252 , 256[3, 6]; Girratono v. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517 , 66 S.W.2d 903, 909 [21], . The judgment is' affirmed. WESTHUES and BARRETT, CC., concur. PER CURIAM. , The foregoing opinion by BOHLING,-C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Kauffman v. Coble

676 S.W.2d 897 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1984

Wantuck v. United Savings and Loan Association, 461 S.W.2d 692, 694 (Mo. banc 1971). … Smith v. Smith, 313 S.W.2d 753, 756 (Mo.App.1958).

Pettus v. Berger

354 S.W.2d 863 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1962

Brown, driving a 1954 Ford at a speed of 40 miles an hour, saw the headlights of Mrs. … In Coit v.

State v. Dixon

809 S.W.2d 116 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1991

United States v. … United States v.

State ex rel. Ruppel v. Wiethaupt

254 Mo. 319 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 3, 1914

[Tie and Timber Co. v. Drainage Dist. Co., 226 Mo. l. c. 440, 444; Drainage Dist. v. Railroad, 216 Mo. 709 .] … Ry. v. Young, 96 Mo. l. c. 42) particularly in view of the fact that the record affirmatively shows no legal notice was given. The judgment is affirmed. Brown, C., concurs. PER CURIAM.

State v. Taylor

701 S.W.2d 725 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1985

One of the police officers spoke with Valerie Brown, the tenant in the apartment above. When the officer informed Ms. Brown that defendant’s wife was dead, Ms. Brown responded, “One day I knew he was going to kill her.” … State v. Feger, 340 S.W.2d 716, 725 (Mo.1960); State v. Maddox, 657 S.W.2d 719 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Baker, 626 S.W.2d 680 (Mo.App.1981).

State ex rel. Castillo v. Clark

881 S.W.2d 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1994

Cash v. Bolle, 423 S.W.2d 743, 748 (Mo. banc 1968); Butts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 9 F.R.D. 58 , 59 *630 (D.D.C.1949); Weir v. Simmons, 233 F.Supp. 657, 660 (D.Neb.1964). … Cash v. Bolle, 423 S.W.2d 743, 748 (Mo. banc 1968); Butts v. *631 Sears, Roebuck & Co., 9 F.R.D. 58 , 59 (D.D.C.1949); Weir v. Simmons, 233 F.Supp. 657, 660 (D.Neb.1964).

Abernathy v. White

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 2019

Goldstein, 555 U.S. 335, 341 (2009); Brown v. Grisenauer, 970 F.2d 431, 435 (8th Cir. 1992). … In Brown, after the relationship between the mayor and the board of aldermen deteriorated, the board passed a resolution of impeachment against the mayor. Id. at 433.

Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

157 Mo. 477 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1900

So, also, in Brown v. … [Beck v. Ferrara, 19 Mo. 30 ; Link v. Vaugbn, 17 Mo. 585 ; Duncan v. Fisher, 18 Mo. 403 ; Robinson v. Rice, 20 Mo. 229 ; Huston v. Forsyth Scale Works, 56 Mo. 416 ; Eyerman v. Cemetery Ass’n, 61 Mo. 489 ; Ensworth v.

Murphy v. SS Kresge Co.

239 S.W.2d 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1951

Was it right in the middle of a board or where two boards are joined together? A. … Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company, 99 Mo. 310, 318, 319 , 12 S.W. 655 , 656. See also Kennedy v. St. Louis Transit Co., 103 Mo.App. 1, 6, 7 , 78 S.W. 77, 78 .

Corder v. Morgan Roofing Co.

355 Mo. 127 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1946

This was administered by a Bi-Partisan Board and all contracts made by this Board were required to have P.W.A. approval. … None of these cases are in point on the construction of defendant's policy herein, nor is Brown v. Jones, 4 Fed. Cas.

Sidway v. Missouri Land & Live Stock Co.

116 F. 381 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · May 28, 1902

Basye v. Ambrose, 28 Mo. 39 ; Young v. Woolfolk, 33 Mo. 110 ; Ticknor v. Voorhies, 46 Mo. 110 ; Breckenkamp v. Rees, 3 Mo. App. 585 ; W.yler v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 89 Fed. 44 . … In Purdy v. Wallace, Muller & Co. (C. C.) 81 Fed. 513 , Judge Brown, as did Judge Baker in Whiteley Malleable Castings Co. v. Sterlingworth Ry. Supply Co. (C.

State of Missouri v. Timothy Wolf

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2020

State v. Paden, 533 S.W.3d 731, 738 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); State v. Onate, 398 S.W.3d 102, 106 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013)(citing Brown v. … Fite v. Johnson, 530 S.W.3d 508, 510 (Mo. banc 2017) (citing Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 730 n.5) (“Rule 29.07(d) does not apply to claims enumerated within Rule 24.035.”).

Harden v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 1, 2020

See also Cieszkowska v. Gray Line N.Y., 295 F.3d 204, 205-206 (2d Cir. 2002); Michau v. Charleston Cty., 434 F.3d 725, 728 (4th Cir. 2006); Newsome v. EEOC, 301 F.3d 227, 231-33 (Sth Cir. 2002); Rowe v. … Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001); and Lister v. Dep’t of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005).

Shannon Commission Co. v. Redman

189 Mo. App. 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1915

[Harless v. Electric Ry., 123 Mo. App. 22, 31 ; Spurg v. Hurd, 151 Mo. App. 579, 583 ; Blackwell v. St. Ry. Co., 137 Mo. App. 654, 658 .] … [Hubbell v. Flint, 15 Gray, 550 ; Richardson v. Woodbury, 12 Cush. 279 ; Rohan v. Hanson, 11 Cush. 44 ; Tomlinson v. Kinsella, 31 Conn. 268 ; Brown v. Burns, 67 Me. 535 ; Dorsey v. Wayman, 31 Md. 59 ; Johnson v.

Conservative Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Warnecke

324 S.W.2d 471 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1959

Foley v. Euless, 214 Cal. 506 , 6 P.2d 956 . The court, in Cousins Inv. Co. v. … Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co., supra; Foley v. Euless, supra; Grass v. Big Creek Development Co., supra.

State ex rel. Craig v. Dougherty

45 Mo. 294 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1870

They constitute the de facto board of education of Kansas City, and the legality of their election is not a subject of inquiry here. (Facey v. Fuller, 18 Mich. 527 ; Hooper v. Goodwin, 48 Me. 79 . People v. … (Cass Township v. Dillon, 16 Ohio St. 38 ; School District No. 2 v. District No. 1, 3 Wis. 333 ; Kendall v. United States, 12 Pet. 615 .) *300 4.

Wright-Jones v. Mo. Ethics Comm'n

544 S.W.3d 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 2018

V, sec. 3. … Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc. , 211 S.W.3d 145 , 147 (Mo. App. W.D. 2007) (quoting Bridges v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. , 146 S.W.3d 456 , 458 (Mo. App. W.D. 2004) ).