Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.04s

  • Brown v. United States

    518 A.2d 446 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1986

    United States, 466 A.2d 452 (D.C.1983); (2) attempted housebreaking, Hampton v. United States, 340 A.2d 813 (D.C.1975); (3) carrying a pistol without a license, Williams v. … Hammill v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crenshaw v. Georgetown University

    23 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 1998

    .”); Robinson v. … Glovinsky v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1247 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1833

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Paulson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

    Op. at 4-6 (discussing Brown v. Snow, 407 F. Supp.2d 61 (D.D.C. 2005) (Leon, J.)). The plaintiff filed this civil action on March 19, 2007. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F. Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Brown

    706 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2010

    See County of Sacramento v. … . § 2672 ; see Stuto v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ambrose v. Brown

    42 App. D.C. 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1914

    E. 317 ; Manker v. Phoenix Loan Asso. 124 Iowa, 341, 343 , 100 N. W. 38 ; Murray v. Etchepare, 132 Cal. 286, 288 , 64 Pac. 282 ; Mulcahey v. Strauss, 151 Ill. 70, 80 , 37 N. E. 702 ; American Steel & Wire Co. v. … Ratcliff v. Adler, 71 Ark. 269, 271 , 72 S. W. 896 ; Jones v. Stewart, — Tenn. —, 61 S. W. 105 , 107; Mavor v. Northern Trust Co. 93 Ill. App. 314, 319 ; Fox River Paper Co. v. Western Envelope Co. 109 Ill.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    304 A.2d 292 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1973

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. American Stores, Inc.

    32 A.2d 388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1943

    Brown, as administrator and intervenor, applied *389 to this court for the allowance of an appeal from said judgment. … In Hall v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Brown

    25 App. D.C. 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905

    It is the rule laid down in Smith v. … See also the cases of Wright v. Holcomb, 5 App. D. C. 76; Smith v. Bell, 6 Pet. 68 , 8 L. ed. 322; Brant v. Virginia Coal & I. Co. 93 U. S. 326 , 23 L. ed. 927; Potter v. Couch, 141 U. S. 316 , 35 L. ed. 732, 11 Sup.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • EDWARD BROWN v. UNITED STATES

    139 A.3d 870 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016

    See, e.g., Zeledon v. … Fadero v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Czajka v. Holt Graphics Arts, Inc.

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

    Fund II v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 592 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))); accord id. at 500-01 (Scalia, J., dissenting).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    682 A.2d 1131 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1996

    See, e.g., Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354, 367, 369 , 103 S.Ct. 3043, 3051, 3052 , 77 L.Ed.2d 694 (1983); Reese v. United States, 614 A.2d 506, 511 (D.C.1992); see also United States v. Ecker, 177 U.S.App. … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • STEPHON BROWN v. UNITED STATES.

    146 A.3d 110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2016

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-CF-737 9/1/16 STEPHON BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … See White v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2024

    See Utah v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Campbell

    41 App. D.C. 499 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1914

    The Examiner of Interferences and the Board of Examiners in Chief, after an unusually exhaustive and satisfactory analysis of the evidence, found that Campbell had established a conception and reduction to practice in February … VTe therefore agree with the Office that the case is ruled by Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App. D. C. 86; Richards v. Burkholder, 29 App. D. C. 485; Gordon v. Wentworth, 31 App. D. C. 150, and other cases in this court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2024

    See Utah v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Noisette v. Paulson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

    (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976))). The defendant has shown that Noisette failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. … See Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437; see also Ikossi v. Dep’t of Navy, 516 F.3d 1037, 1044 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Brown, 777 F.2d at 16. “In the D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. Brown

    124 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1941

    Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11 , 89 F.2d 230 . It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal. Affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hayden

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2020

    BROWN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-2561 (BAH) v. … See Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 (1976); see also Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Winston

    197 F.2d 601 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1952

    Brown wrote Mrs. Rosa Jones a letter, which recited that he had learned that her son did not want to sell the property. He told Mrs. … After public hearing the Commission made findings of fact and conclusions of law and suspended Brown’s license as a real estate and business chance broker for a period of sixty days.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.