Case law

Jeremy Cady and Ryan Johnson v. Missouri Secretary of State John Ashcroft, and Heidi Miller and Laura Dominik

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2020

Coops., 497 S.W.3d at 915 (quoting Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 645). … (citing Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256, 165 S.W.2d 657, 663 (1942)).

Cook v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.

214 Mo. App. 596 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1924

[Koerner v. St. Louis Car Co., 209 Mo. 160 , 107 S.W. 481 ; Young v. Lusk, *Page 610 268 Mo. 639 , 187 S.W. 849 ; Kettlehake v. Car Foundry Co., 171 Mo. App. 541 , 153 S.W. 552 ; Johnson v. … App. 94 , 156 S.W. 807 ; McCall v. B. Nugent Bros. Dry Goods Co., 236 S.W. 324 ; H. St. J.R.R. Co. v. Fox, 31 Kan. 597 ; Railway Co. v. Triplett, 54 Ark. 299 , 15 S.W. 831 , 16 S.W. 266 ; Haynie v.

Sours v. State

603 S.W.2d 592 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 18, 1980

The majority’s reliance on Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682 , 97 S.Ct. 2912 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977) and Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977), is misplaced. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 .

State v. Devereux

823 S.W.2d 2 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1991

BROWN: Your Honor, there was no testimony that Miss Vickers said he’s— THE COURT: What? MS. BROWN: There was no testimony that Miss Vickers said he’s done this before. … The Missouri Supreme Court, in State v.

Moler v. Whisman

243 Mo. 571 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1912

Louis v. Liessing, 190 Mo. 464.] … Scotland County v. Bacon, 107 Mo. 633 ; O’Connor v. Transit Co., 198 Mo. 642 .] II.

Lassiter v. Martin

748 S.W.2d 819 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1988

Groves v. Hall, 628 S.W.2d at 421 . Procedurally, the record before us is similar to that considered in Brown v. General Motors Assembly Division, 695 S.W.2d 501 (Mo.App.1985). … In re Redemption Proceeding by Hokanson, 706 S.W.2d 569, 560 [1] (Mo.App.1986); Landers v. Smith, 379 S.W.2d 884, 887 [4] (Mo.App.1964). We must take the record as it comes to us. Board of Public Utilities v.

United States v. Ozark Air Lines, Inc.

374 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1974

Courts should be “slow to overturn an administrative decision,” Labor Board v. … v.

Rita Aust v. Platte County, Missouri PC Homes, LLC Kelly Jo Yulich Trust Arlene Kagan and Wendy Winer

477 S.W.3d 738 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2015

Browning-Ferris Industries, 674 S.W.2d 150, 152 (Mo. … State Tax Comm'n v. Luten, 459 S.W.2d 375, 378 (Mo. banc 1970).

State of Missouri, ex rel. Christopher Culp v. The Honorable Dennis Rolf, Circuit Judge

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2019

Ban v. State, 554 S.W.3d 541, 546 (Mo. App. … Evans v. Brown Builders Elec.

Leigh v. State

639 S.W.2d 406 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1982

Nathaniel Brown, whom movant alleges is crucial to his alibi defense. The trial court found the rape took place between 10:15 and 10:30 a.m. on January 15, 1975. … Brown would have testified that he did not pick movant up from the institution until after 11:00 a.m. on the morning of the rape. Mr. Brown’s testimony, if believed, would establish the defense of alibi.

Driver v. Anheuser

397 S.W.2d 11 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1965

Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., 332 Mo. 1150 , 61 S.W.2d 328 ; Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 339 Mo. 63 , 95 S.W.2d 1173 . Addressing our remarks to that part of the testimony of Dr. … Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., supra; Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., supra; Vol. 32, Words and Phrases, Page 172.

Finnegan v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

244 Mo. 608 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1912

J., in Schaub v. … In Railroad v. Scanlon, 22 Ky.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. David Browning and Kyle Himmelberg

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 2021

Bd. v. Macon Cty. Comm’n, 485 S.W.3d 353, 355 (Mo. banc 2016). … Cook Tractor Co. v. Dir. of Revenue, 187 S.W.3d 870, 873 (Mo. banc 2006).

AUTO., PETRO. & ALLIED IND. EMP. v. Gelco Corp.

581 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 5, 1984

Brown's present grievance. If an arbitrator rejects Gelco's contention, then Gelco may sue in this Court to set aside the arbitrator's award, see e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … Smith v.

Commerce Trust Co. v. Katz Drug Co.

552 S.W.2d 323 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1977

Brown fell. … Brown’s fall.

Premium Standard Farms, Inc. v. Lincoln Township

946 S.W.2d 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1997

Council Home Redevelopment Corp. v. … .”); City of Lee’s Summit v. Browning, 722 S.W.2d 114 (Mo.Ct.App.1986).

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Clean Water Commission

34 S.W.3d 197 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000

On September 9, 1999, Judge Thomas Brown entered an order dismissing Willamette’s petition without prejudice. … Hagely v. Board of Educ. Of Webster Groves School District, 841 S.W.2d 663, 665 (Mo.banc 1992).

Harden v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 1, 2020

See also Cieszkowska v. Gray Line N.Y., 295 F.3d 204, 205-206 (2d Cir. 2002); Michau v. Charleston Cty., 434 F.3d 725, 728 (4th Cir. 2006); Newsome v. EEOC, 301 F.3d 227, 231-33 (Sth Cir. 2002); Rowe v. … Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001); and Lister v. Dep’t of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005).

Hathman v. Waters

586 S.W.2d 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1979

Ambruster v. Ambruster, supra; Harrellson v. Barks, supra; Cooper v. Freer, supra. … Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 (1941); Cox v. A. P. Green Fire Brick Co., 230 Mo.App. 774 , 75 S.W.2d 621 (1934); Glover v. Shirley, 169 Mo.App. 637 , 155 S.W. 878 (1913); Forbs v. St. Louis, I. M. & S.

Markovich v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

266 S.W.2d 641 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

Defendant cites Hamilton v. Patton Creamery Co., 359 Mo. 526 , 222 S.W.2d 713, 717 [8, 12]; Murphy v. S. S. Kresge Co., Mo.App., 205 S.W.2d 252 , 256[3, 6]; Girratono v. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517 , 66 S.W.2d 903, 909 [21], . The judgment is' affirmed. WESTHUES and BARRETT, CC., concur. PER CURIAM. , The foregoing opinion by BOHLING,-C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.