Case law

ANDREWS & KNOWLES PRODUCE COMPANY v. Currin

243 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1955

Quotations are from opinion of Brown, J., in Sloan v. Hart, supra. See Sloan v. Hart, 153 N.C. 183 , 69 S.E. 50 . … Chesson v. Container Co., 215 N.C. 112 , 1 S.E. 2d 357 ; Perkins v. Langdon, supra. In Monger v. Lutterloh, supra, an entirely different situation was presented.

Carrow v. . Commissioners of Beaufort

74 N.C. 700 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

(For the Syllabus, see the next preceding case of French and McRae v. The Commissioners of New Hanover, ante , page 692.) … The action was brought by the plaintiff in his own behalf, and in behalf of all other taxpayers, etc., to restrain the collection by the defendant, the Board of Commissioners of Beaufort County, of the excess of tax levied

Zachary v. North Carolina Railroad

156 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1911

Brown, J. There are twenty-three assignments of error in tbe record, none of them relating to tbe reception or rejection of evidence. … Wolf v. R. R., 154 N. C., 571 ; Sherrill v. R. R., 140 N. C., 255 ; Weiss v. Bethlehem Iron Co., 88 Fed. Rep., 23; St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Jackson, 78 Ark., 100; 93 S. W., 746 ; Baltimore, etc., R. Co. v.

Canadian Universal Insurance v. Sims

235 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 17, 1964

Pearson v. Flooring Company, 247 N.C. 434 , 101 S.E.2d 301 (1958); Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E.2d 137 (1944). … One of the leading cases in North Carolina on the distinction between an employee and independent contractor is Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College, supra.

State v. Shine

121 N.C. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1995

Stat. § 8C, Rule 403 (1992); see also State v. … See State v.

Williams v. Neuville Industries

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 17, 1999

Christopher Brown for reconstruction of her right temporomandibular joint. … Gupton v. Builders Transport , 320 N.C. 38 (1987). 6.

Howland v. United States Postal Service

209 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 17, 2002

Brown v. … (quoting Carson v. Giant Food, Inc., 175 F.3d 325, 331 (4th Cir. 1999)). Finally, a federal worker cannot state a cause of action for employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 . Brown v.

Bennett v. Eastern Rebuilders, Inc.

52 N.C. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1981

Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971); 5 N.C. Index 2d, Master and Servant, § 10, p. 327.” Tatum v. Brown, 29 N.C. App. 504, 505 , 224 S.E. 2d 698, 698-99 (1976) (emphasis added). … Gause v. Perkins, 56 N.C. 177 (1857).” Frink v. Board of Transportation, 27 N.C. App. 207, 209 , 218 S.E. 2d 713, 714 (1975).

Rouse v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

343 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1996

Ernest Brown, Jr., and Dr. Samuel Wheatley in support of his motion for summary judgment. … The medical bylaws also provide that only physicians who are Board-certified or Board-eligible— those who have completed their residency — by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology are eligible for clinical privileges

Commercial Bank v. Burgwyn

110 N.C. 267 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1892

I did not sit in the board during the consideration of the paper discounted. … March v. Verble, 79 N. C., 19 ; Wittkowsky v. Wasson, 71 N. C., 451 ; Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 244 ; State v. Waller, 80 N. C., 401 .

North Carolina State Bar v. DuMont

52 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1981

.; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788 , 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, 299 N.C. 123 (1980). … Comr. of Insurance v. Rating Bureau, 292 N.C. 70, 80 , 231 S.E. 2d 882, 888 (1977). Boehm v. Board of Podiatry Examiners, 41 N.C. App. 567, 568-69 , 255 S.E. 2d 328, 330 , cert. denied, 298 N.C. 294 (1979).

Ceplecha v. Pine Knoll Townes Phase II

176 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2006

Association ("the Board"). … Electric and Power Co. *769 v. Tillett, 80 N.C.App. 383 , 385, 343 S.E.2d 188 , 191, cert. denied, 317 N.C. 715 , 347 S.E.2d 457 (1986). Brown v.

L.P. v. Wake County Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 15, 2021

Batch’s office forward the message to Lindsay Mahaffey, a member of the Wake County Public School System (“WCPSS”) Board of Education (“Board”). … . §§ 1401(9), (26), (29); see Board of Ed. of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist., Westchester Cty. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 203 (1982). The Supreme Court in Fry v.

Griffin v. Holden

180 N.C. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2006

Plaintiff had not obtained Board approval before making the transfer. The Board of Commissioners decided to release the consulting report to the public. … Cline v. Brown, 24 N.C. App. 209, 214 , 210 S.E.2d 446, 449 (1974), cert. denied 286 N.C. 412 , 211 S.E.2d 793 (1975) (quoting Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 85 , 15 L. Ed. 2d 597, 606 (1966)).

Creighton v. State of North Carolina

257 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 15, 1966

See, for example: Watkins v. Morris, 179 So.2d 348 (Fla.1965); Fish v. State of Florida, 159 So.2d 866 (Fla.1964); State v. Davis, 2 Conn.Cir. 257, 197 A.2d 668 (1963) , citing United States ex rel. Farnsworth v. … In People v.

Lambeth v. City of Thomasville

179 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1920

Brown, J. Tbe power of the defendant to enter into the contract sued upon does not seem to be denied, at least it is not raised by any assignment of error or discussed in the defendant’s brief. … Wyatt v. R. R., 156 N. C., 307 ; Whitfield v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 211 ; Davenport v. R. R., 148 N. C., 287 ; Wade v. Tel. Co., 147 N. C., 219 ; Wilkinson v. Dunbar, 149 N. C., 20 ; R. R. v. Church, 104 N. C., 525 .

Ehrenhaus v. Baker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2015

The agreement also included a “fiduciary out” provision that required the Board to submit the proposed merger for a vote even if the Board was no longer recommending it. Id. … The Board voted unanimously to approve the proposed merger, and the Federal Reserve System’s board of governors approved the merger shortly thereafter. Id. at 66, 717 S.E.2d at 15.

State v. Smith

823 S.E.2d 678 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2019

State v. … STATE V.

State v. Hall

114 N.C. 909 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1894

Rorer’s Interstate Law, 308 ; Story’s Conflict Laws, 620-623 ; The Antelope, 10 Wheaton, 66 -123; State v. Knight, Taylor’s Rep., *912 65; State y. Brown, 1 Haywood, 100; State v. Cutshall, 110 N. … I say the offence, was committed on board of the schooner; for, although the gun was fired from the ship Rose, the shot took effect and the death happened on board of the schooner,and the act was, in contemplation of law,

Henderson v. City of Wilmington

191 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1926

In Wilson v. Board of Aldermen, 74 N. … Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, supra; and cases cited; Brown v. R. R., 188 N. C., 52 ; Ketchie v. Hedrick, supra; *278 Armstrong v. Comrs., 185 N. C., 405 ; Williams v. Comrs., 176 N. C., 554 ; Stephens Co. v.