Case law

United States Postal Service v. Dallas County Appraisal District

857 S.W.2d 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1993

The United States Postal Service and ten of its lessors (collectively postal service) sued the Dallas County Appraisal District and the Dallas County Appraisal Review Board (collectively the appraisal district) over its taxation … Stafford v. Stafford, 726 S.W.2d 14, 16 (Tex.1987).

Turner v. Edmonston

210 Mo. 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1908

Brown, 43 Mo. l. c. 297, the court said: “When the judgment in the case of Brown v. The Hannibal and St. Joe R. … Lander was the attorney who gave direction to the whole matter, he was cognizant of all the facts, and is therefore chargeable in the same manner as Brown himself.”' [Board of Trustees v. Fry and Woods, 192 Mo. 552 .]

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Financial Assurance, Inc.

624 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 1985

That observation leads in turn to the Court’s earlier decision in National Labor Relations Board v. … Even if that is so, however (for the contrary argument see Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Mfg.

Roark v. SOUTH IRON R-1 SCHOOL DIST.

540 F. Supp. 2d 1047 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 8, 2008

See Berger v. Rensselaer Central School Corp., 982 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir.1993); Meltzer v. Board of Public Instruction, 548 F.2d 559, 575 (5th Cir.1977); Chandler v. James, 985 F.Supp. 1094, 1101 (N.D.Ala.1997); Goodwin v. … No. 7, 394 F.Supp. 417 (E.D.Ark.1973); Tudor v. Board of Education, 14 N.J. 31 , 100 A.2d 857, 868 (1953); Brown v. Orange County Board of Public Instruction, 128 So.2d 181, 185 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1960).

Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. Land

420 S.W.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1967

That it is the policy of this Court to require strict compliance with all of the requirements of MAI is made clear in Brown v. St. … A skateboard is a piece of board to which skate wheels are attached. As he rode down the driveway Galen was seated on the skateboard, with his knees in front of his body, his hands holding onto the sides of the board.

Hawkins v. Cox

334 Mo. 640 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1933

[State ex rel. v. Grinstead, 314 Mo. 55 , 78, 282 S.W. 715 ; Brown Coal Co. v. City of New Madrid (Mo.), 208 S.W. 109 ; Crutchfield v. Warrensburg, 30 Mo. App. 456 ; State ex rel. v. … Dierkes, 214 Mo. 578 , 589, 113 S.W. 1077 ; Terry v. Board of Education, 84 Mo. App. 21 , 25; Woolfolk v. Randolph County, 83 Mo. 501 , 505; Montague Compressed Air Co. v. Fulton, 166 Mo. App. 11 , 30, 148 S.W. 422 .]

Jenks v. Jenks

385 S.W.2d 370 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1964

Brown v. Childers, Mo.App., 254 S.W.2d 275, 281 . … In Belknap v.

Hoffmann v. Hoffmann

676 S.W.2d 817 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1984

The husband serves as chief executive officer, president and board director of the corporation. His two brothers and another corporation officer are the only other members of the board of directors. … But see Brown v. Luce Mfg. Co., 231 Mo.App. 259 , 96 S.W.2d 1098, 1102 (1936), in which directors of closely held corporation relinquished their authority over declaration of dividends to the president. .

Kleffner v. Director of Revenue

956 S.W.2d 446 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1997

Poage v. Director of Revenue, 948 S.W.2d 194, 195 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). … Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). Probable cause to arrest exists when circumstances and facts would warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been committed. Rogers v.

Smith v. Spencer

234 Mo. App. 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1939

The same point was urged in the case of Spencer and Browne v. … [See Spencer and Browne v. Smith, et al., supra .]

Wilson v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

129 Mo. App. 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1908

In Grimes v. … [Railroad v. Paney (Texas), 99 S. W. 589 ; Brown v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 222 .]

State ex rel. Glendinning Companies of Connecticut v. Letz

591 S.W.2d 92 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1979

Magenheim v. Board of Education, 347 S.W.2d 409, 417 (Mo.App.1961). … Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1, 11 (Mo. banc 1975). In Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v.

State v. Lipscomb

160 Mo. 125 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1901

[State v. Adams, 108 Mo. 208 ; State v. Mohr, 68 Mo. 303 ; State v. Coulter, 46 Mo. 565 ; State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 317 .] … [State v. Patterson, supra; State v. Phelps, 74 Mo. 128 ; State v. Hedgepeth, 125 Mo. 22 ; State v. McClain, 131 Mo. 316 .]

State v. Vogt

304 S.W.3d 209 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2009

Relying on Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. banc 2002), the trial court found that Vogt could not use Rule 29.07 as a means to evade the time limits established for filing a Rule 24.035 motion. … Pettis v. State, 212 S.W.3d 189, 193 (Mo.App. W.D.2007); see also Williams v. State, 765 S.W.2d 392, 393 (Mo.App.

Shannon Brown, Successor Personal Representative for the Estate of Daniel Kruse, and Personal Representative for the Estate of Sharon Kruse v. Seven Trails Investors, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2014

Arnold determined that Daniel’s wound was not caused by a brown recluse spider bite, but a pressure sore. … Hand testified that the wound was the result of either a brown recluse spider bite or necrosis.

State v. Burris

729 S.W.2d 661 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1987

State v. … State v. Jackson, 643 S.W.2d 74 (Mo.App.1982); State v. Powell, 618 S.W.2d 47 (Mo.App.1981); State v. Laws, 547 S.W.2d 162 (Mo.App.1977). The second point is denied and the judgment is affirmed.

Dodwell Ex Rel. Williams v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

384 S.W.2d 643 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1964

Co. v. Christian, supra; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Wells, supra; Brown v. The Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co., supra; Trent v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 319 , 180 S.W. 792 [6]; 74 C.J.S. … Co. v. Johnson, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W. 758 ; Brown v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 294 S.W.2d 223 ; Gesas v. Oregon Short Line R. Co., 33 Utah 156 , 93 P. 274 , 13 L.R.A.,N.S., 1074; Carmer v.

Watts v. Gross

468 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1971

In Bradley v. … See Turner v. Browne, 351 Mo. 541 , 173 S.W.2d 868 ; Leibson v. Henry, 356 Mo. 953 , 204 S.W.2d 310 ; Clark Estate Co. v.

Morden v. Ciccone

335 F. Supp. 920 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 1971

See Peacock v. Hughes (C.A.5) 427 F.2d 359, 360 ; Canavari v. Richardson (C.A.9) 419 F.2d 1287 ; Brown v. Taylor (C.A.10) 287 F.2d 334 , cert. denied 366 U. S. 970 , 81 S.Ct. 1933 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1259 . … Gibson v. Looney (C.A.10) 258 F.2d 879 ; Section 4207, Title 18, U.S.C.; Edwards v. United States (C.A.6) 422 F.2d 856 .

State ex rel. Ballew v. Woodson

161 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1901

Gray v. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 .] The same doctrine is laid, down in Ward v. Board, 135 Mo. 309 ; and in 4 Enc.