Case law

Brown v. Parks & Recreation Dep't

296 Or. App. 886 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2019

In Smith v. … See Stewart v. Kralman , 240 Or.

State v. Brown

203 Or. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 2006

After the trial court granted defendants’ motion, we held in State v. … Defendants cross-appeal, assigning as error the admission of evidence found during a search of a shed on the property of defendant Brown’s mother. We affirm the trial court’s decision on that issue without discussion.

Broyles v. Estate of Brown

295 Or. 795 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1983

Morrison v. Hall, 55 Or 243, 244 , 104 P 963 (1909). In Stirling v. … In Loveland v.

State v. Brown

285 Or. App. 872 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2017

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing those amounts, based on our decision in State v. Williams, 280 Or App 631 , 380 P3d 1225 , rev den, 360 Or 604 (2016).

Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co.

24 Or. 315 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

evidence, taken in its full strength, has no tendency, in the opinion of the judge, to maintain the issue for him, it is an useless consumption of time to hear evidence in defense, and after that direct a nonsuit ”: Bragdon v. … Co. v. Commercial National Bank, 123 U. S. 733 (8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 266). 2.

Brown v. Infotec Development, Inc.

88 Or. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987

See, e.g., United States v. Studley, 783 F2d 934 (9th Cir 1986); Borroughs v. Wallingford, 780 F2d 502 (5th Cir 1986); Newman v. Schiff 778 F2d 460 (8th Cir 1985); United States v. Romero, 640 F2d 1014 (9th Cir 1981).

Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company

93 Or. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1988

Using the legal standard, the Board makes a factual finding about reasonableness. See Lester v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 70 Or App 307, 311 , 689 P2d 342 , rev den 298 Or 427 (1984). … See Price v. SAIF, 73 Or App 123, 126 , 698 P2d 54 (1985); Norgard v.

Brown v. Southern Pacific Co.

47 L.R.A. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1899

In Masury v. … Elizabeth Brown and Sam H. Brown, by Carson & Fleming, Their Attorneys.”

Brown v. Meier & Frank Co.

160 Or. 608 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1938

Taylor v. Jones, 42 N. H. 25; Page v. De Puy, 40 Ill. 506 ; Griel v. Hunter, 40 Ala. 542 .” Also, to the same effect, see: Stromberg v. Hansen, 177 Minn. 307, 225 N. W. 148 ; Atchison etc. R. Co. v. … Cas. 981; Keefe v. Hart, 213 Mass. 476 , 100 N. E. 558 , Ann. Cas. 1914A, 716; Smith v. Bryson, (Tex.), 33 S. W. (2d) 268 ; Oxford v. Berry, 204 Mich. 197 , 170 N. W. 83 ; Torson v.

Dan Bunn, Inc. v. Brown

285 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1979

In Ross v. … This court in Elliott v. Bozorth, 52 Or 391,403, 97 P 632 (1908), and in Hughes v.

Brown v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

77 Or. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1985

PER CURIAM Claimant seeks review of a Worker’s Compensation Board order that affirmed a referee’s opinion denying the compensability of a 1983 back injury and denying temporary partial disability compensation, penalties and … Claimant is entitled to the unpaid amounts of compensation and to penalties and attorney fees, which the Board must determine on remand. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

Employment Division v. Brown

57 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

The Employment Division seeks review of a decision of the referee, made pursuant to ORS 657.683, setting aside a deficiency assessment against respondents Brown, dba Charleston Boat (hereafter Charleston Boat). 1 In the referee

Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 2024

A Providence emergency 228 Brown v. … Griffith v. Blatt, 334 Or 456, 467-68, 51 P3d 1256 (2002). Neither the terms 236 Brown v.

Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 2024

A Providence emergency 228 Brown v. … Griffith v. Blatt, 334 Or 236 Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC 456, 467-68, 51 P3d 1256 (2002).

Dixon v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

291 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 2018

We state the relevant facts as found by the board, along with undisputed procedural facts. See Gallant v. Board of Medical Examiners , 159 Or. App. 175 , 177, 974 P.2d 814 (1999). … (quoting Metcalf v. AFSD , 65 Or. App. 761 , 765, 672 P.2d 379 (1983), rev. den. , 296 Or. 411 , 675 P.2d 493 (1984) (emphasis in original) ). A few years later, in Sobel v. Board of Pharmacy , 130 Or.

Brown v. Western Farmers Association

268 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1974

On the same date, in Price v. … See Brownell v.

Brown v. Nelson International

117 Or. App. 24 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1992

The Board adopted the referee’s opinion, which denied the claims. We affirm. … He characterizes the Board’s award of PTD effective November 11 as the “law of the case” and contends that, by that ruling, the Board changed his medically stationary date.

City of Damascus v. Brown

266 Or. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

We consolidated all of the petitions for review and, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, designated three lead cases to address in this opinion — City of Damascus v. Brown (A156920); City of Damascus v. … Couey v. Brown, 257 Or App 434, 438 , 306 P3d 778 (2013), rev allowed, 354 Or 735 (2014) (citing Yancy v. Shatzer, 337 Or 345, 349 , 97 P3d 1161 (2004)) (emphasis in original).

Miller v. Brown & McCabe

57 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1910

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while engaged in loading lumber for defendant on board a steamer lying at the docks in Portland.

State v. Brown

276 Or. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2016

State v. Scott, 343 Or 195, 200 , 166 P3d 528 (2007); State v. Meade, 327 Or 335, 339 , 963 P2d 656 (1998). … Edwards v. Arizona, 451 US 477, 483-84 , 101 S Ct 1880 , 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981); State v.