Case law

Wilson v. Brown

7 N.J. Misc. 389 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1929

Ash v. Brown

121 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 30, 1938

On December 24th, 1934, Edward Brown and Tom Morris, partners trading as “B & M Garage,” procured a judgment against Eobert Ash in the First District Court of the city of Paterson for certain willful and malicious acts that … L. 54, under the title of Ash v. Cohn, and in which prosecutor fears he may be prejudiced by the record as it now is in the District Court.

Brown v. Matthews

51 N.J.L. 253 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1889

. • The case thus presented is on all fours with Dufford v.

Garretson v. Brown

26 N.J.L. 425 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1857

Brown, previous to the assignment, confessed a Judgment to John J. Brown, the assignee. 2. … Varnum v. Camp, 1 Green 326.

Baldwin v. Brown

3 N.J.L. 533 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1809

Woodruff v. Brown

17 N.J.L. 246 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1839

J. said, “ it was held in Brown and Ux v. Smith, cited in Bull. N. R. 117, that if the heir sell to I. … Den v. Dodd, 1 Hal. 367; Ackerman v. Shelp, 3 Hal. 129.

State v. Brown

31 N.J.L. 355 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1865

In the case of The State v. … Ludlow v. Ludlow, 1 South. 389 ; State v. Coleman, 1 Green 103; Carron v. Martin, 2 Dutcher 600.

Manning v. Brown

48 N.J. Eq. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1891

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 10. For reversal — None.

Brown v. Lasseff

111 N.J.L. 235 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1933

Hoffman v. Lasseff, 110 N. J. L. 122. The proofs in that ease differed materially from those in the case under consideration here. The appellant Lasseff urges three grounds for reversal: 1.

State v. Brown

27 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1858

The board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson granted to Albert N. … In Barnet v. Johnson, it was held that there were uses to which the company could not apply lands acquired for the use of their canal.

Close v. Brown

47 N.J. Eq. 328 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 12. For reversal — None.

Brown v. Simandl

93 N.J. Eq. 119 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 25, 1920

Brown, in 1868, and which he took into possession, occupied and died seized and by his will devised to complainants; that prior 'to the time of the conveyance to Brown a boundary, fence had been erected along the south line … Ballantine v. Harrison, 37 N. J. Eq. 560; Hart v. Leonard, 42 N. J. Eq. 416; Outcalt v. George W. Helme Co., 42 N. J. Eq. 665, 676; Worthington v. Moon, 53 N. J. Eq. 46; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad v.

Taylor v. Brown

31 N.J. Eq. 163 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

Eorce, being a creditor of Archibald 3L Brown, brought suit against him to recover his debt. The complainant, also a creditor of Mr. Brown, placed his claim in the hands of an attorney for collection. … Brown executed an assignment of the interest, it was not for the benefit of Taylor and Force alone, but included in its provisions the claims of other creditors, also, to be paid ratably with theirs.

Stephenson v. Brown

3 N.J. Eq. 503 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

and Jacob Owen Brown, their heirs and assigns for ever.” … Cited in Van Duyner v. Van Duyner’s Ex. 1 M'Car. 49.

Dolan v. Brown

81 N.J. Eq. 262 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1913

Emery, V. C. … Peirsol v. Roop (Vice-Chancellor Grey, 1898), 56 N. J. Eq. (11 Dick.) 739, 747; 22 Am. & Eng. Encycl.

Welsh v. Brown

50 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1892

Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 . At the foot of this receipt- is a short account, as follows: -“X C. … Eq. 348; Ackerman v. Blauvelt, 8 C. E. Gr. 495; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 570; Dufford v. Smith, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 222), and also by depriving-him of compensation. Elmer v. Loper, 10 C. E. Gr. 475, 482; Dufford v.

Veal v. Brown

2 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1806

These qualifications do not make a lawful jury, according to the opinion which I gave in the case of Sayre v. Scudder, in this term. Chetwood, for plaintiff. I think the judgment must be reversed.

Brown v. Winter

82 N.J.L. 729 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1912

Brown v. Williamson

8 N.J.L. 447 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1826

Williamson v. Brown

10 N.J.L. 296 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1829

Although not precisely the same in point of fact, this case is within the principles on which the decision was made in Reed v. Rocap. .Bet the judgment be affirmed.