Case law

Brown v. McLean

16 D.C. 559 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1887

Close It! Title Services, Inc. v. Nadel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2021

Corp. v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)”).  17 not to retract the statements.

Brown v. United States

555 A.2d 1034 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1989

Graves v. United States, 150 U.S. 118, 121 , 14 S.Ct. 40, 41 , 37 L.Ed. 1021 (1893). … Shelton v. United States, 388 A.2d 859, 863 (D.C. 1978).

United States v. Brown

708 A.2d 637 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1998

See Spinner v. … Insofar as Arkansas v.

Brown v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2009

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v.

Poole v. Brown

706 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1989

Koster v. … Co. v. M/V Nordic Regent, 654 F.2d 147 , 152 (2d Cir.1980). 4 .

Brown v. United States

518 A.2d 446 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1986

United States, 466 A.2d 452 (D.C.1983); (2) attempted housebreaking, Hampton v. United States, 340 A.2d 813 (D.C.1975); (3) carrying a pistol without a license, Williams v. … Hammill v.

Donald Brown v. United States

97 A.3d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2014

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CF-803 DONALD BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … Tuckson v.

Brown v. Miller

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2009

DISTRICT COURT' Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. tJ~ 1~92 JERRY D. MILLER, ESQ., Defendant. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Deener v. Brown

8 D.C. 350 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1874

Brown, and the indorser, Jerome Browne, jr., united as defendants, as permitted by our laws. The check is dated 24th July, 1871, is drawn for $100, and payable to Jerome Browne or bearer. … The payee, Jerome Browne, makes *354 no defense; but the drawer, Wilson E.

Brown v. Norris

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2009

DISTRICT COURT Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., et al., ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Complaint fails to meet the requirements of Rule 8(a). The complaint does not make clear whether there is one plaintiff or multiple plaintiffs.

Brown v. Tomlinson

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

See Complaint ¶ 3; Pl.’s Ex. 3, Affidavit of Christian Craig Brown (“Second Aff. of Brown”) at 1. … Id.; Pl.’s Ex. 2, Affidavit of Cristian Craig Brown at 1-2.

Brown v. Queen

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09 0614 ELLIOTT QUEEN, ESQUIRE, Defendant. … See, e.g., Brady v. Livingood, 360 F.

Squires v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

(citation omitted); Fowler v. … Wilson v. Good Humor Corp., 757 F.2d 1293, 1297 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1985). Mr. Squires has acknowledged Mr. Brown’s efforts to have a prototype of his invention built and the recruitment of Mr.

Crenshaw v. Georgetown University

23 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 1998

.”); Robinson v. … Glovinsky v.

Brown v. Slocum

30 App. D.C. 576 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1908

Counsel for appellant rely on the case of Lawrence v. Middle States Loan, Bldg. & Constr. Co. 7 App. D. C. 161. In that case the loan was for $4,000, and there was deducted, under the guise of a commission, $688. … In McBroom v. Scottish Mortg. & Land Invest. Co. 153 U. S. 318, 328 , 38 L. ed. 729, 783, 14 Sup. Ct.

Brown v. Levi

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2009

Di§-tr`ict end Kevin Arthur Brown, Banl<rupt€¥ CW"?S Petitioner, 1 ' 0 €){ *‘,+ v. : CivilAction No. ou 190 l Troy Levi, Respondent. … As the court of appeals said in Garris v.

Hutchinson v. Brown

19 D.C. 136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1890

Brown, acting for the defendant, S. P. … Brown’s benefit, they must return the verdict for the defendant.”

Brown v. Wygant

17 D.C. 447 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1888

Marx v. Brown

18 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1927

The Commissioner, after an analysis of the evidence, concurred in the views of the board and awarded priority to Brown. … The board found that the invention was made by Brown before Marx entered the field and was publicly used more ' than two years before the filing date of either party.