Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

0.47s

  • Harding v. Modern Income Life Insurance Co.

    593 S.W.2d 568 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1979

    Plaintiffs were also advised that they had become members of an “Advisory Board” and received a document entitled “Advisory Board Duties, Future Security Life.” … This concept of requiring reasonable self-protection was further defined in Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Reese

    795 S.W.2d 69 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1990

    Edwards v. … V.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • State v. Reed

    162 Mo. 312 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1901

    Wyatt’s, as he had been, paying her board, and she wanted to give him her photograph as he wanted it, and she took it out of my hand and I shot her before I knew what I was doing. I had the gun when I went to the depot. … [State v. Welch, 33 Mo. 33 ; State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 367 ; State v. Bleekley, 18 Mo. 428 ; State v. Connell, 49 Mo. 282 ; State v. Holcomb, 86 Mo. 371 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brooklyn Nat. League Baseball Club v. Pasquel

    66 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 31, 1946

    See also Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619 ; 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 ; Ladew et al. v. … Ed. 1491 ; Meyer v. Washington Times Company, 1935, 64 App.D.C. 218 , 76 F.2d 988 , certiorari denied 295 U.S. 734 , 65 S.Ct. 646 , 79 L.Ed. 1682 ; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Emerson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. City of Ferguson

    359 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1962

    Kansas City v. North Kansas City, 360 Mo. 374 , 228 S.W.2d 762 , State ex inf. Major v. Kansas City, 233 Mo. 162 , 134 S.W. 1007 , and State ex rel. Brown v. … Bauer v. City of Berkeley, Mo., 278 S.W.2d 772 ; Koch v. Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State College, Mo., 256 S.W.2d 785 ; Evens & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co., 48 Mo.App. 634 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Daniel J. Garber

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2025

    State v. Brown, 619 S.W.3d 586, 590 (Mo. App. E.D. 2021) (quoting State v. Bescher, 247 S.W.3d 135, 140 (Mo. App. S.D. 2008)); see also Harrison v. State, 301 S.W.3d 534, 539 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009); State v. … See Brown, 619 S.W.3d at 592.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Uelk v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc.

    803 S.W.2d 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1991

    Brown v. Harrison, 637 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App., W.D.1982). … Brown, 637 S.W.2d at 147 (quoting Page v. Hamilton, 329 S.W.2d 758, 767 (Mo.1959)).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Bisans

    104 S.W.3d 805 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 2003

    State v. Hawthorne, 74 S.W.3d 826, 828 (Mo.App. W.D.2002). Appellant was convicted of making a false report under § 575.080.1. … State v. Givens, 917 S.W.2d 215, 216-17 (Mo.App. W.D.1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Red Top Taxicab Co. v. Terminal Railroad

    322 Mo. 463 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1929

    Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co., 72 L. … Co. v. James, 298 Mo. 497 , 251 S. W. 53 , and Cravens v. Bodgers, 101 Mo. 247 , 14 S. W. 106 . Our views on those cases are set forth in Canary Taxicab Co. v. Terminal By.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stitt v. Stitt

    617 S.W.2d 645 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1981

    While our courts appear divided on this issue, this court concludes that in the instant proceedings, the rationale expressed in Brown v. Brown, supra, is the appropriate one to follow. In Brown v. … That is not the main point, but it illustrates the soundness of the rationale expressed in Brown v. Brown, supra, and the one adopted herein.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Laclede Gas Co. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Com.

    657 S.W.2d 644 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1983

    See Travis v. Grabiec, supra; Aaron v. Review Board, supra. … The reasoning in Aaron v. Review Board, supra and Travis v. Grabiec, supra is preferred.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Dilley

    336 Mo. 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1934

    [State v. Duncan, 330 Mo. 656, 661 , 50 S. W. (2d) 1021, 1023 .] There is no evidence, direct or circumstantial, connecting the appellant with the actual larceny. … [State v. Prunty, 276 Mo. 359, 371 , 208 S. W. 91, 94 ; State v. Burns, 263 Mo. 593, 599 , 173 S. W. 1070, 1072 ; State v. Toohey, 203 Mo. 674, 679 , 102 S. W. 530, 532 .] It is also true that when Mr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jones v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.

    587 F. Supp. 1533 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 1984

    She in fact was not sick but had sought a job interview at Sanford Brown Business College. Sanford Brown was a competitor of defendant and was the place of Schelling's new employment. 26. … United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Causey v. Williams

    398 S.W.2d 190 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1965

    Bussmeyer v. Jablonsky, 241 Mo. 681 , 145 S.W. 772 , 39 L.R.A.,N.S., 549; Di Pasco v. Prosser, 364 Mo. 1193 , 274 S.W.2d 279 ; Schnider v. M. E. H. Realty Inv. Co., supra. … The following cases hold that this is a necessary element to be found: Foxx v. Thompson, 358 Mo. 610 , 216 S.W.2d 87 ; Bussmeyer v. Jablonsky, supra; Schnider v. M. E. H. Realty Inv. Co., supra.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. Louis

    318 Mo. 870 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 18, 1928

    Board of Commissioners v. Peter, 253 Mo. 520 , is cited, opinion by Judge Lamm. … The same was held in the case of Brown v. Phillips, 254 S. W. l. c. 702, and in Findley-Kehl Inv. Co. v. O’Con *907 nor, 226 S. W. l. c. 800.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Bowers v. S-H-S Motor Sales Corp.

    481 S.W.2d 584 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1972

    In Ford v. … The recent case of Baker v. St.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Gill v. State

    300 S.W.3d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 2009

    V, sec. 10; Order of June 16,1988. … In their respective trials, both Gill and Brown claimed that the other pulled the trigger. See State v. Gill, 167 S.W.3d 184, 188 (Mo. banc 2005); State v. Brown, 246 S.W.3d 519 , 524-25 (Mo.App.2008). 5 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Puzzanchera v. Loetel

    293 S.W.3d 51 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2009

    Pam contacted attorney Cliff Brown (Brown). … Mace v. Loetel, 166 S.W.3d 114, 117 (Mo.App.2005); Robertson v. Robertson, 15 S.W.3d 407, 413 (Mo.App.2000).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Browne's Appeal

    69 Mo. App. 159 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1897

    State v. Hynes, 39 Mo. App. 569 . … State v. Ransberger, 42 Mo. App. 466 . The requirement of section 4057, Revised Statutes, does not apply to proceedings before a justice of the peace. State v. Flowers, 56 Mo.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Farber v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    139 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1897

    Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 , loc. cit. 596. … Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104 ; Perkins v. Railroad, 55 Mo. 201 ; Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 ; Farber v. Railroad, 116 Mo. 81 . II.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.