Case law

Cahoon v. . Comrs. of Hyde

207 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934

Parker v. Debnam, 195 N.C. 56 , 141 S.E. 535 ; Castle v. Threadgill , 203 N.C. 441 , 166 S.E. 313 ; Shelly v. Grainger , 204 N.C. 488 , 168 S.E. 736 . … Moore v. Monument Co. , 166 N.C. 211 , 81 S.E. 170 ; Rousseau v. Bullis , 201 N.C. 12 . Affirmed. *Page 50

Adams Creek Associates v. Davis

227 N.C. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2013

Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). … See Tucker v. Tucker, 197 N.C.

Chastain v. Arndt

253 N.C. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2017

Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110, 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997) (citing Anita R. Brown-Graham & Jeffrey S. Koeze, Immunity from Personal Liability under State Law for Public Officials and Employees: An Update, Loc. … V. Conclusion When sued in his official capacity, Defendant is entitled to the same sovereign immunity as Gaston College and its Board of Trustees.

Mayfield v. Carolina Shoe Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 25, 1998

Board of Trustees of the New Bern Graded Schools v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.

230 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949

Mayfield v. Carolina Shoe Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 19, 1997

Florence Concrete Products, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General Contractors

341 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1995

See Baker Construction Co. v. Phillips, 333 N.C. 441 , 426 S.E.2d 679 (1993). Based on our holding in Vogel v. … Rev. 1968; Brown v. Sikes, 188 S.C. 288 , 198 S.E. 854 (1938).

State v. . Portee

200 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

S. v. Bowman , 80 N.C. 437 ; S. v. Crockett , 82 N.C. 599 ; S. v. Burton , 94 N.C. 948 ; S. v. Randall , 170 N.C. 762 ." In S. v. … Riley, the father, said: `Yes, sir, you are the man that was at my house and introduced yourself as Brown from High Point.'

Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.

238 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953

Branch v. Board of Education, supra; 28 Am. Jur., Injunctions, section 268. … R. v. Transit Co., 195 N.C. 305 , 141 S.E. 882 ; Brown v. Aydlett, 193 N.C. 832 , 136 S.E. 721 ; Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N.C. 32 , 135 S.E. 480 ; Brinkley v. Norman, 190 N.C. 851 , 129 S.E. 145 ; Johnson v.

Munick v. City of Durham

181 N.C. 188 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1921

Roberts v. R. R., 143 N. C., 179 . Indeed, the facts are very similar to those in Bucken v. R. R., 157 N. C., 443 , “Acting within the scope of employment means while on duty.” Cook v. R. R., 128 N. C., 336 . In Ange v. … Jackson v. Tel. Co., 139 N. C., 347 .

J.H. v. Wake County Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 18, 2025

) ORDER ) WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ) EDUCATION, ef al., ) Defendants. ) This cause comes … The Court has considered the arguments of the parties and, in light of the liberal standard for granting leave to amend, see Laber v.

BEATENHEAD v. Lincoln County

358 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 2004

Adams Creek Associates v. Davis

367 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2013

Munick v. . Durham

181 N.C. 188 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1921

The water-works in the city of Durham are owned by the municipality and are operated by it under the supervision of the defendant Board of Water Commissioners. … Roberts v. R. R. , 143 N.C. 179 . Indeed, the facts are very similar to those in Bucken v. R. R. , 157 N.C. 443 , "Acting within the scope of employment means while on duty." Cook v. R. R. , 128 N.C. 336 . In Ange v.

Williams v. Humphreys

367 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2013

Tong v. Dunn Powell v. Dunn

2016 NCBC 49 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 8, 2016

Tong v. Dunn; Powell v. Dunn, 2016 NCBC 49. … Brown Management Services, Inc.: The law in Delaware is crystal clear that a claim accrues as soon as the wrongful act occurs.

Dellinger v. Bollinger

242 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1955

Bond v. Bond, 235 N.C. 754 , 71 S.E. 2d 53 , and cases cited; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … In re Cranford, 231 N.C. 91 , 56 S.E. 2d 35 ; Browning v. Humphrey, 241 N.C. 285 , 84 S.E. 2d 917 , and cases cited.

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

57 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 9, 1999

Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 *233 U.S. 483, 74 S. Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“Brown I”). In a subsequent decision, the Supreme Court further mandated desegregation “with all deliberate speed.” Brown v. … In the school desegregation context, the watershed decision of Brown v.

Higdon v. Davis

71 N.C. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1984

Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 (1937). *648 Plaintiff argues that the prescriptive period for acquiring title to an easement is judge-made law and the correct prescriptive period is 20 years. Speight v. … Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, supra. *653 This rule contemplates a definite and specific line to which the user of the easement is confined.

Data General Corp. v. County of Durham

143 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2001

Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285 , 350 S.E.2d 111 , *101 114 (1986) (citing J.M. Thompson Co. v. Doral Mfg. Co., 72 N.C. App. 419, 424 , 324 S.E.2d 909, 912-13 (1985)); see Bruggeman v. … Teer Co. v. N.C.