Case law

Brown v. Employment Dept.

235 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 2010

App. 339 BROWN v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT. A140744 Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 12, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

Linn County v. Brown

366 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2020

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. 336 Linn County v. Brown BALMER, J. … Linn County v. Brown, 297 Or App 330, 342, 443 P3d 700 (2019) (emphasis in origi- nal).

Snyder v. ESPINO-BROWN

235 Or. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2010

Takata v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 217 Or App 454, 458 , 176 P3d 415 (2008) (citing Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 693 , 159 P3d 1151 (2007)). … The Supreme Court first construed ORS 12.155 in Duncan v. Dubin, 276 Or 631 , 556 P2d 105 (1976).

United States v. Brown

24 F. Cas. 1248 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 18, 1869

As to the testimony of Brown — lie has no actual pecuniary interest in the event of the action.

SAIF Corp. v. Brown

177 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 2001

See SAIF v. Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445-46 , *119 978 P2d 407 (1999) (summarizing employer’s arguments). … See Benz v. SAIF, 170 Or App 22, 27-28 , 11 P3d 698 (2000).

Snyder v. Espino-Brown

350 Or. 141 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

Snyder v. Espino-Brown, 235 Or App 82, 87 , 230 P3d 122 (2010). … In Duncan v.

Elkhorn Baptist Church v. Brown

366 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2020

Brown, Samuel N. Brown, Virginia Stegemiller, B. David Hurley, and Douglas W. Hills, Intervenors-Adverse Parties, v. … version=1.80 (accessed June 10, 2020). 516 Elkhorn Baptist Church v. Brown replaces EO 20-25.

Brown v. Graham

169 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 13, 1959

Healy v. Ratta, 292 U.S. 263 , at page 271, 54 S.Ct. 700 , 78 L.Ed. 1248 . … West Publishing Co. v. McColgan, 9 Cir., 138 F.2d 320, 326 , at page 326, 149 A.L.R. 1094 .

Brown v. Thompson

Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 2001

BROWN, Petitioner on Review, v. S. FRANK THOMPSON, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent on Review. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hamel v. Johnson , 330 Or 180 , 998 P2d 661 (2000).

Brown v. Morrow

Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2001

Filed: February 8, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON GILBERT CLARENCE BROWN, Petitioner on Review, v. MITCH MORROW, Acting Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent on Review. … The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hamel v. Johnson , 330 Or 180 , 998 P2d 661 (2000).

Herrlin v. Brown & McCabe

71 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1914

Mulkey, 14 Or. 59 ( 12 Pac. 76 ); Knahtla v. Oregon S. L. R. Co., 21 Or. 136 ( 27 Pac. 91 ); White v. White, 34 Or. 141 ( 50 Pac. 801 , 55 Pac. 645 ); Wild v. Oregon S. L. Ry. Co., 21 Or. 159 ( 27 Pac. 954 ); Palmer v. … W. 783 ); Eklund v. Martin, 87 Minn. 441, 444 ( 92 N. W. 406 ); McDermott v. Higby, 23 Cal. 490 ; Loewenberg v. Rosenthal, 18 Or. 178, 181 ( 22 Pac. 601 ).

Brown v. Haun

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1999

BROWN, personal representative of the estate of Leonore Brown; and ROBERT W. BROWN, Petitioners on Review, v. THOMAS M. HAUN, M.D., and THOMAS M. HAUN, M.D., P.C., an Oregon corporation, Respondents on Review.

Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'n

291 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

We recently addressed a related but not identical argument in Dixon v. Oregon State Board of Nursing , 291 Or.App. 207 , 419 P.3d 774 (2018). … Board of Parole , 356 Or. 186 , 195, 335 P.3d 828 (2014) (quoting Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 , 294 Or. 357 , 370, 657 P.2d 188 (1982) ).

Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile

95 Or. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1989

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … Therefore, we hold that the Board did not err in reversing the referee’s award of permanent total disability. Affirmed.

Brown v. MacDonald & Associates, LLC

260 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2013

There is no evidence of recent misconduct by her, but [Brown’s] sons are understandably concerned * * On appeal, this court affirmed without opinion. Brown v. Brown, 233 Or App 227 , 224 P3d 708 (2009). … State v.

Brown v. Oregon State Bar

293 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1982

It issued an opinion, approved by the Board of Governors, which stated that the meeting with the director and hearings officer of LCDC violated DR 7-110(B) and DR 9-101, Oregon State Bar, Code of Professional Responsibility … Recall Bennett Comm. v. Bennett et al., 196 Or 299 , 249 P2d 479 (1952); State ex rel Dental Ass’n. v. Smith, 201 Or 288 , 270 P2d 142 (1954).

Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

342 Or. 684 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2007

See Bergerson v. … See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.

Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co.

172 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1943

As said in Peterson v. … Middlebusher took no part in controlling the actual loading of logs as was done by Brown in the instant case. While there is undoubtedly language in Middlebusher v.

Schroeder v. Brown & McCabe

59 Or. 81 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1911

Brown v. Guard Publishing Co.

267 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2014

In Turner v. … State v.