Case law

Brown v. Van Pelt

64 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1917

Brown, W. H. Brown, and Rhoda Yarhola, as defendants. … Sussex v. Worth, Cro. Eliz. pt. 1, p. 5; Shecomb v. Hawkins, Cro. Jac. 318, Velv. 222; Winter v. Loveday, 1 Comyns Rep. 37; Sugden, Powers, p. 749 ; 4 Greenlief’s Cruise’s Dig. 165, 166; Taussig v.

Brown v. Kemmerer

140 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1929

Hereinafter, Barbara Kemmerer will be referred to as plaintiff, and Davis Brown, Betty Brown, and Clay Brown as defendants. … Citizens State Bank, 23 Okla. 723 , 102 Pac. 800 ; Richmond v. Robertson, 50 Okla. 635 , 151 Pac. 203 ; Martin v. Hostetter, 59 Okla. 246 , 158 Pac. 1174 ; Johnson v.

Brown v. State

753 P.2d 1368 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1988

Brown, and his co-defendant, Rolando Torino Nelson, 1 were tried by a jury in Muskogee County District Court, Case No. … According to Pierce v.

Higgins v. Brown, Judge

1 Okla. Crim. 33 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1908

Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. (U. S.) 511-542, 7 L. Ed. 242 ; Case v. Toftus (C. C.) 39 Fed. 733 , 5 L. R. A. 684; Territory v. Lee, 2 Mont. 130 ; Murphy v. Ramsey, 114 U. S. 15 , 5 Sup. Ct. 747, 29 L. Ed. 47 ; Thompson v. … “United States v.

Brown v. Holt

174 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

The movant cites in support thereof Durant et al. v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11 , 157 P. 353 , and related cases. This motion is not contested. A response was ordered on November 13, 1933, but none has been filed.

State v. Brown

625 P.2d 1273 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1981

CRF-80-136, the State of Oklahoma v. Lewis Cornell Brown. Mr. … Patterson v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 244 , 147 P.2d 179 (1944), Carter v. State, 595 P.2d 1352 (Okl.Cr.1979).

Hamilton, Sheriff v. Brown

31 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Wattenbarger v. Hall, 26 Okla. 815 , 110 Pac. 911 ; Harris v. First Nat. Bank of Bokchito, 21 Okla. 189 , 95 Pac. 781 ; Border et al. v. … Section 115, Freeman on Executions; Burke v. *217 Johnson, 37 Kan. 337, 15 Pac. 204 , 1 Am. St. Rep. 252 ; Roberts v. Robinson, 49 Neb. 717 , 68 N. W. 1035 , 59 Am. St. Rep. 567 ; Perkins v. Meighan, 147 Mo. 617 , 49 S.

Leedy v. Brown, Judge

27 Okla. 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

State ex rel. v. Brown, Judge, 24 Okla. 435 , 103 Pac. 762 . (d) Does section 23 of said act violate sec. 1, of art. 4, of the Constitution? … Morrison v. Brown, Judge, et al., 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 25 ; Hill v. Tarver, 130 Ala. 592 . Assuming that Ered S. Caldwell, as counsel to the Governor, and J. M.

Brown v. State

745 P.2d 741 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1987

Brown, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Commanche County Case No. … Dollar v. State, 674 P.2d 43 (Okl.Cr.1984).

Brown v. McKinney

279 P.2d 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1954

In Davis v. … In Silmon v.

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n

125 P.3d 1219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 2005

.]; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. … Morrison v. Roberts, see note 13 at ¶ 5, supra. 29 . Mahan v. Agee, see note 16, supra; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v.

Brown v. State

7 Okla. Crim. 698 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1912

In Bea v. State, 3 Okla. Or. 269, the objection to this instruction is pointed out and made clear. The opinion in that case was filed on the 7th day of December, 1909.

Opinion No. 66-185

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1966

OPINION — AG — QUESTION(1): CAN THE OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS ACCEPT THE CONFERENCE GRADES FOR A LICENSE? … — THE OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS MAY NOT DELEGATE ITS DUTY TO DETERMINE THE QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANTS FOR LICENSES ISSUED BY THE BOARD TO ANY INDEPENDENT AGENCY OR ASSOCIATION; HENCE, THE BOARD

Swift & Co. v. Brown

202 Okla. 572 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1950

Brown at about 1 A. M. on November 10th. I was called by Dr. Oglesby and Mr. Brown was confined to The Muskogee General Hospital. Mr. Brown was stuperious but not in coma and when roused was rational. … It is announced to sustain the finding as in Hollis v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. and Skelly Oil Co. v. Rose, supra, and to vacate an award as in Texas Co. v. Fox, supra.

Brown v. Anderson

430 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1976

Brown and Elsie Brown v. The United States of America, CIV-76-0701-D, alleges the identical cause of action as the instant action but seeks to recover from the United States rather than from the individual employee. … In Brown et al. v. United States, supra, Plaintiffs allege that the United States is liable to Plaintiffs for injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of Earl Anderson, an employee of the United States.

Torix v. Brown

295 P.3d 1138 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 2012

Id., quoting New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). See also Henmessee v. … We similarly hold there is insufficient evidence, as a matter of law, to support Plaintiff's claim that the town was negligent in hiring or retaining Brown. {11 In Brock v.

Brown v. Beets

279 P.3d 193 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2012

Vance v. Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, 1999 OK 78, ¶ 6 , 988 P2d 1275, 1278 . … Daugherty v. Farmers Coop. Ass'n, 1984 OK 72, ¶ 5 , 689 P.2d 947, 949 . T 6 There are two issues on appeal. First, whether the Release prevents Brown from suing the Beets for negligence.

Brown v. Oklahoma City

107 Okla. 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

Shipman, Adm'r v. Brown

36 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1913

Thus in Williams v. … In Finn v.

United States v. Brown

399 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1975

See United States v. Erwing, supra. … United States v. Baca, supra. 1 .