Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Brown v. Combs

    29 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1860

    Cairns et al., v. … Foster v. Hale, 3 Ves. 696; Steere v. Steere, 5 Johns. Ch. R. 1 — 12.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Brown

    10 N.J. Eq. 308 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1855

    Brown advanced his money? These circumstances are explained by showing that Mr. … Brown did not purchase as the mere agent of the complainant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. National State Bank (In Re Brown)

    73 B.R. 306 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 20, 1987

    Hudson Trust Co. v. Boyd, 80 N.J.Eq. 267, 84 A. 715 (Ch.1912); Heritage v. Bethel, 96 N.J.Eq. 515, 125 A. 917 (Ch.1924), Aff'd. 97 N.J.Eq. 366 (E. & A.1925); Colonial Bldg.-Loan Ass'n v. … Deshler v. Holmes, 44 N.J.Eq. 581, 18 A. 75 (E. & A.1888); Atwood v. Carmer, 75 N.J.Eq. 319, 73 A. 114 (Ch.1909). 3 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Brown

    272 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1993

    The certification continues: “Since I have been unable to make personal service upon the defendant, Albert Brown, it is respectfully, requested that substituted service be allowed on the Unsatisfied Claim and Fund Board.” … Another defendant (Brown) had not been served. Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Murray

    54 N.J. Eq. 594 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896

    Palmer, 42 Conn. 60 ; Drake v. Stone, 58 Ala. 136 ; Harley v. Heist, 86 Ind. 197 ), and it refuses, on the other hand, to hold, as the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Foster v. … And see Campbell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 98 Mass. 381, 400 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Brown

    279 N.J. Super. 648 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1995

    See also Softexture Yarns, Inc. v. Board of Review, 59 N.J.Super. 57 , 157 A.2d 142 (App.Div.1960); Charles Headwear; Inc. v. Board of Review, 11 N.J.Super. 321 , 78 A.2d 306 (App.Div.1951). … its own hearing to create an adequate record or to supplement the existing record; it could even have ordered the Appeal *652 Tribunal and the parties to reconstruct the missing portions of the record, see, e.g., State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Nevins

    84 N.J.L. 215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 21, 1913

    Brown, for work, labor and material putting on roofs on Nos. 64, 66 and 68 Tuers avenue, Jersey City, New Jersey, I hereby agree that the said roofs will remain water tight for a period of ten years, and if by reasonable

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Journeay v. Brown

    26 N.J.L. 111 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1856

    Brown, and stated how it was there. … Chipman v. Sabbaton, 7 Paige 47 . The plaintiffs in certiorari have not, in my opinion, made manifest any error in the order appointing a receiver, and the order ought to be affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    311 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1997

    Her stepbrother, defendant Timothy Brown, came into her room and asked if he could watch television in her room, and then if he could sleep in her bed. … Furthermore, in People v. Armstrong, 212 Mich.App. 121 , 536 N.W.2d 789 (1995), the defendant was the step-brother of the victim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. Brown

    24 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1853

    In the case of Shepherd v. Leverson (Penn. … The question in the case of Arnold v. Mundy (1 Halst. 1) was as to the right of property and possession to the land covered with water where the oysters were planted. In the case of Brinckerhoff v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    27 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1858

    The board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson granted to Albert N. … In Barnet v. Johnson, it was held that there were uses to which the company could not apply lands acquired for the use of their canal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Close v. Brown

    47 N.J. Eq. 328 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

    For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 12. For reversal — None.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Simandl

    93 N.J. Eq. 119 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 25, 1920

    Brown, in 1868, and which he took into possession, occupied and died seized and by his will devised to complainants; that prior 'to the time of the conveyance to Brown a boundary, fence had been erected along the south line … Ballantine v. Harrison, 37 N. J. Eq. 560; Hart v. Leonard, 42 N. J. Eq. 416; Outcalt v. George W. Helme Co., 42 N. J. Eq. 665, 676; Worthington v. Moon, 53 N. J. Eq. 46; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Brown

    31 N.J. Eq. 163 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

    Eorce, being a creditor of Archibald 3L Brown, brought suit against him to recover his debt. The complainant, also a creditor of Mr. Brown, placed his claim in the hands of an attorney for collection. … Brown executed an assignment of the interest, it was not for the benefit of Taylor and Force alone, but included in its provisions the claims of other creditors, also, to be paid ratably with theirs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stephenson v. Brown

    3 N.J. Eq. 503 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

    and Jacob Owen Brown, their heirs and assigns for ever.” … Cited in Van Duyner v. Van Duyner’s Ex. 1 M'Car. 49.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dolan v. Brown

    81 N.J. Eq. 262 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1913

    Emery, V. C. … Peirsol v. Roop (Vice-Chancellor Grey, 1898), 56 N. J. Eq. (11 Dick.) 739, 747; 22 Am. & Eng. Encycl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Welsh v. Brown

    50 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1892

    Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 . At the foot of this receipt- is a short account, as follows: -“X C. … Eq. 348; Ackerman v. Blauvelt, 8 C. E. Gr. 495; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 570; Dufford v. Smith, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 222), and also by depriving-him of compensation. Elmer v. Loper, 10 C. E. Gr. 475, 482; Dufford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Veal v. Brown

    2 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1806

    These qualifications do not make a lawful jury, according to the opinion which I gave in the case of Sayre v. Scudder, in this term. Chetwood, for plaintiff. I think the judgment must be reversed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Winter

    82 N.J.L. 729 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1912

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Williamson

    8 N.J.L. 447 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1826

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.